Ancient Land Breathing

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE SUB-STANCE Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1353/sub.2023.a900562
T. Ravindranathan
{"title":"Ancient Land Breathing","authors":"T. Ravindranathan","doi":"10.1353/sub.2023.a900562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"You would think, given the individual’s sacrosanct place at the center of a political modernity imposed across the world, you would think, given your own sense of having a body and through it a life (habeas corpus), that there would be some sure measure, when persons die, wherever persons die, of how many persons have died. But no. There are countless ways to count persons, to decide where a person ends and another starts. Stick to sheep! Counting persons would only confound the mind, and if sleep came it would be a tangled, gnarled sort of sleep. Lévi-Strauss maintained that a traditional society was most ecologically viable when it did not exceed 250 (288). Students of such societies understand now this was not just a material and environmental limit— having to do with how much one could extract from an environment without destroying it—but also a mental and invisible one, having to do with an ecology of ghosts. Danowski and De Castro: Amazonian peoples prefer to maintain a steady population rather than to grow, “for people live in other people, with other people, for other people” (104). Ancient peoples know that reality is many-sided. This is why, said the prime minister, we cannot be sure how many persons have died from this sickness. It is not because we lack the means, he said. We have the world’s best information technology systems, we have a unique biometric identification system that links your gas and water connections and your food rations to your fingerprint, we have even borrowed from a fellow unapologetic nation the flying horse technology allowing us to gently watch over every citizen so as to better keep track. But we are a deeply philosophical people with roots stretching back into an ancient seer past. We know that despite appearances, reality is everelusive, shape-shifting, deceptive, a mirage that we must step through if we are to see the truth. We have known for millennia, long before the West caught on, that most stories are untrue, that news is fake, that the world itself is an illusion. And of such a land, you demand a body count? Consider, moreover, that in these parts many persons may share the same name. Take H.B. the father of the nation’s nuclear program and H.B.","PeriodicalId":45831,"journal":{"name":"SUB-STANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SUB-STANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2023.a900562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

You would think, given the individual’s sacrosanct place at the center of a political modernity imposed across the world, you would think, given your own sense of having a body and through it a life (habeas corpus), that there would be some sure measure, when persons die, wherever persons die, of how many persons have died. But no. There are countless ways to count persons, to decide where a person ends and another starts. Stick to sheep! Counting persons would only confound the mind, and if sleep came it would be a tangled, gnarled sort of sleep. Lévi-Strauss maintained that a traditional society was most ecologically viable when it did not exceed 250 (288). Students of such societies understand now this was not just a material and environmental limit— having to do with how much one could extract from an environment without destroying it—but also a mental and invisible one, having to do with an ecology of ghosts. Danowski and De Castro: Amazonian peoples prefer to maintain a steady population rather than to grow, “for people live in other people, with other people, for other people” (104). Ancient peoples know that reality is many-sided. This is why, said the prime minister, we cannot be sure how many persons have died from this sickness. It is not because we lack the means, he said. We have the world’s best information technology systems, we have a unique biometric identification system that links your gas and water connections and your food rations to your fingerprint, we have even borrowed from a fellow unapologetic nation the flying horse technology allowing us to gently watch over every citizen so as to better keep track. But we are a deeply philosophical people with roots stretching back into an ancient seer past. We know that despite appearances, reality is everelusive, shape-shifting, deceptive, a mirage that we must step through if we are to see the truth. We have known for millennia, long before the West caught on, that most stories are untrue, that news is fake, that the world itself is an illusion. And of such a land, you demand a body count? Consider, moreover, that in these parts many persons may share the same name. Take H.B. the father of the nation’s nuclear program and H.B.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古老的陆地呼吸
你会认为,考虑到个人在世界各地强加的政治现代性中心的神圣不可侵犯的地位,考虑到你自己拥有一个身体并通过它获得生命的感觉(人身保护令),你会认为当有人死亡时,无论有人死在哪里,都会有一些确定的衡量标准来衡量有多少人死亡。但不是。有无数种方法可以计算人数,决定一个人在哪里结束,另一个人从哪里开始。坚持绵羊!数人只会让人感到困惑,如果睡着了,那将是一种混乱、粗糙的睡眠。莱维·斯特劳斯(Lévi Strauss)坚持认为,当传统社会的人口不超过250(288)时,它在生态上是最可行的。这些社会的学生现在明白了,这不仅是物质和环境的限制——与一个人在不破坏环境的情况下能从环境中提取多少有关——而且是一个精神和无形的限制,与鬼魂的生态有关。Danowski和De Castro:亚马逊人民更喜欢保持稳定的人口,而不是增长,“因为人们生活在其他人身上,与其他人一起,为其他人”(104)。古人知道现实是多方面的。这就是为什么,首相说,我们不能确定有多少人死于这种疾病。“这并不是因为我们缺乏手段,”他说。我们拥有世界上最好的信息技术系统,我们有一个独特的生物识别系统,可以将你的煤气和水连接以及你的口粮与指纹联系起来,我们甚至从一个不道歉的国家借用了飞马技术,使我们能够温和地监视每一位公民,以便更好地跟踪。但我们是一个深刻的哲学民族,其根源可以追溯到一个古老的先知的过去。我们知道,尽管外表如此,但现实是难以捉摸的、变形的、欺骗性的,如果我们想看到真相,就必须跨过这一海市蜃楼。几千年来,早在西方流行起来之前,我们就知道大多数故事都是不真实的,新闻是假的,世界本身就是一种幻觉。在这样的土地上,你要求清点尸体?此外,考虑到在这些地方,许多人可能有相同的名字。以美国核计划之父H.B.和H.B.为例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SUB-STANCE
SUB-STANCE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: SubStance has a long-standing reputation for publishing innovative work on literature and culture. While its main focus has been on French literature and continental theory, the journal is known for its openness to original thinking in all the discourses that interact with literature, including philosophy, natural and social sciences, and the arts. Join the discerning readers of SubStance who enjoy crossing borders and challenging limits.
期刊最新文献
Invocation: FIFTY is Nifty Coughin'/Coffin Air A Breath of Fresh Air: Or, Why the Body is Not Embodied "Survive" Breathing with Mountains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1