The Puborectal Muscle and External Anal Sphincter Can Act Independently of each other in Functional Defecation Disorders

P. Broens
{"title":"The Puborectal Muscle and External Anal Sphincter Can Act Independently of each other in Functional Defecation Disorders","authors":"P. Broens","doi":"10.19080/ARGH.2021.16.555945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Classification currently used for functional defecation disorders (FDDs) assumes that the puborectal muscle and external anal sphincter act as a single functional unit. We hypothesize that the puborectal muscle and external anal sphincter do not act as a single functional unit. Methods: We performed anorectal manometry and defecometry tests in 124 adult patients suffering from functional defecation disorder. Anorectal manometry provides information about the pressure profile of the anal canal and the distal part of the rectum. The defecometry test provides information about rectoanal coordination during defecation. Results: We observed that the puborectal muscle and external anal sphincter did not always contribute equally to an FDD. We distinguished three main groups of FDDs: congruent (n=105), anal sphincter-dominated (n=10), and puborectal muscle-dominated (n=9). The propulsive force required to defecate (rectal pressure increase) correlated more strongly with pressure increase at the level of the puborectal muscle (ρ=0.794) than at the level of the external anal sphincter (ρ=0.488). Conclusion: We conclude therefore that the puborectal muscle and external anal sphincter do not, by definition, act as a single functional unit in patients suffering from FDDs and may differ in the degree of dyssynergia. Our modified classification of FDDs can significantly improve the proper diagnosis and, therefore, treatment of FDDs. Furthermore, we conclude that isolated high puborectal pressure impedes defecation more than isolated anal sphincter contraction.","PeriodicalId":72074,"journal":{"name":"Advanced research in gastroenterology & hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced research in gastroenterology & hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/ARGH.2021.16.555945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Classification currently used for functional defecation disorders (FDDs) assumes that the puborectal muscle and external anal sphincter act as a single functional unit. We hypothesize that the puborectal muscle and external anal sphincter do not act as a single functional unit. Methods: We performed anorectal manometry and defecometry tests in 124 adult patients suffering from functional defecation disorder. Anorectal manometry provides information about the pressure profile of the anal canal and the distal part of the rectum. The defecometry test provides information about rectoanal coordination during defecation. Results: We observed that the puborectal muscle and external anal sphincter did not always contribute equally to an FDD. We distinguished three main groups of FDDs: congruent (n=105), anal sphincter-dominated (n=10), and puborectal muscle-dominated (n=9). The propulsive force required to defecate (rectal pressure increase) correlated more strongly with pressure increase at the level of the puborectal muscle (ρ=0.794) than at the level of the external anal sphincter (ρ=0.488). Conclusion: We conclude therefore that the puborectal muscle and external anal sphincter do not, by definition, act as a single functional unit in patients suffering from FDDs and may differ in the degree of dyssynergia. Our modified classification of FDDs can significantly improve the proper diagnosis and, therefore, treatment of FDDs. Furthermore, we conclude that isolated high puborectal pressure impedes defecation more than isolated anal sphincter contraction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在功能性排便障碍中,耻骨直肠肌和肛门外括约肌可以相互独立作用
背景:目前用于功能性排便障碍(FDD)的分类假设耻骨直肠肌和肛门外括约肌是一个单一的功能单元。我们假设耻骨直肠肌和肛门外括约肌不是一个单一的功能单元。方法:对124例功能性排便障碍的成年患者进行肛门直肠测压和排便试验。肛门直肠测压法提供关于肛管和直肠远端部分的压力分布的信息。排便试验提供排便过程中直肠肛门协调的信息。结果:我们观察到,耻骨直肠肌和肛门外括约肌对FDD的贡献并不总是相等的。我们区分了三组主要的FDD:全等(n=105)、肛门括约肌为主(n=10)和耻骨直肠肌为主(n=9)。排便所需的推进力(直肠压力增加)在耻骨直肠肌水平(ρ=0.794)与压力增加的相关性比在肛门外括约肌水平(ρ=0.0488)更强,在患有FDD的患者中起单一功能单元的作用,并且协同失调的程度可能不同。我们修改的FDD分类可以显著提高FDD的正确诊断和治疗。此外,我们得出的结论是,孤立的耻骨直肠高压比孤立的肛门括约肌收缩更能阻碍排便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Post-Treatment Surveillance Patterns of Care: A SEER- Medicare Study. Asymptomatic Colonic Metastases of Lung Cancer: A Case Report The Puborectal Muscle and External Anal Sphincter Can Act Independently of each other in Functional Defecation Disorders The Outcomes of Endoanal Ultrasound and Three-Dimensional, High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry do not Predict Fecal Incontinence Manometry in Chronic Anal Fissures: Clinical and Therapeutic Correlation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1