Interventions that support unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients: a scoping review.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-09 DOI:10.1080/09638237.2022.2069702
Ruth Naughton-Doe, Nicola Moran, Emma Wakeman, Mark Wilberforce, Laura Bennett, Martin Webber
{"title":"Interventions that support unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients: a scoping review.","authors":"Ruth Naughton-Doe, Nicola Moran, Emma Wakeman, Mark Wilberforce, Laura Bennett, Martin Webber","doi":"10.1080/09638237.2022.2069702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients often lack support for their well-being and feel excluded from decisions about patient care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This scoping review aimed to: synthesise the peer-reviewed literature evaluating the outcomes of brief interventions for unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients, identify transferable lessons for evidenced-informed practice, and establish future research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PRISMA scoping review guidelines were followed to search 12 databases using predefined search terms. Two reviewers independently screened papers and applied exclusion/inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact or outcomes of interventions. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Data were synthesised to categorise types of interventions and evidence for their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 papers met the inclusion criteria, and five types of interventions were identified: those that aimed to (1) increase carer involvement in inpatient care; (2) facilitate organisational change to increase carer support and involvement; (3) provide carers with support; (4) deliver psychoeducation and offer support; and (5) reduce carer stress and improve coping skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whilst evidence of intervention effectiveness was promising, the quality of studies was generally weak. More research is needed to develop an evidence-informed approach to supporting carers during inpatient stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":48135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"105-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2022.2069702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients often lack support for their well-being and feel excluded from decisions about patient care.

Aims: This scoping review aimed to: synthesise the peer-reviewed literature evaluating the outcomes of brief interventions for unpaid carers of adult mental health inpatients, identify transferable lessons for evidenced-informed practice, and establish future research priorities.

Methods: PRISMA scoping review guidelines were followed to search 12 databases using predefined search terms. Two reviewers independently screened papers and applied exclusion/inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact or outcomes of interventions. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. Data were synthesised to categorise types of interventions and evidence for their outcomes.

Results: 16 papers met the inclusion criteria, and five types of interventions were identified: those that aimed to (1) increase carer involvement in inpatient care; (2) facilitate organisational change to increase carer support and involvement; (3) provide carers with support; (4) deliver psychoeducation and offer support; and (5) reduce carer stress and improve coping skills.

Conclusions: Whilst evidence of intervention effectiveness was promising, the quality of studies was generally weak. More research is needed to develop an evidence-informed approach to supporting carers during inpatient stays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持成人精神健康住院病人无报酬照护者的干预措施:范围审查。
成人心理健康住院患者的无薪护理人员往往缺乏对其健康的支持,并感到被排除在患者护理的决策之外。目的:本综述旨在:综合同行评议的文献,评估对成人精神健康住院患者的无报酬护理人员进行简短干预的结果,确定循证知情实践的可转移经验教训,并确定未来的研究重点。方法按照sprisma范围审查指南,使用预定义的检索词对12个数据库进行检索。两位审稿人独立筛选论文并应用排除/纳入标准。如果研究评估了干预措施的影响或结果,则纳入研究。两名审稿人提取数据并评估研究质量。对数据进行综合,对干预措施的类型及其结果的证据进行分类。结果16篇论文符合纳入标准,并确定了五种干预措施:旨在(1)增加护理人员对住院患者护理的参与;(2)促进组织变革,以增加对职业生涯的支持和参与;(3)为照顾者提供支持;(4)提供心理教育和支持;(5)减轻职业压力,提高应对技能。结论:虽然干预有效性的证据是有希望的,但研究的质量普遍较弱。需要进行更多的研究,以制定一种循证方法,在住院期间为护理人员提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mental Health
Journal of Mental Health PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health is an international forum for the latest research in the mental health field. Reaching over 65 countries, the journal reports on the best in evidence-based practice around the world and provides a channel of communication between the many disciplines involved in mental health research and practice. The journal encourages multi-disciplinary research and welcomes contributions that have involved the users of mental health services. The international editorial team are committed to seeking out excellent work from a range of sources and theoretical perspectives. The journal not only reflects current good practice but also aims to influence policy by reporting on innovations that challenge traditional ways of working.
期刊最新文献
Starting well, staying well: randomised controlled trial of "Whitu - seven ways in seven days," a well-being app for university students. Does perceived social cohesion moderate the effect of parental stressors on depressive symptoms? A longitudinal, multi-level analysis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Selective and indicated UK school-based mental health interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Stigma perpetuation at the interface of mental health care: a review to compare patient and clinician perspectives of stigma and borderline personality disorder. Healthcare professional disclosure of mental illness in the workplace: a rapid scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1