Hallux Valgus in Osteoporosis.

J. Ruci, Eduart Gjika
{"title":"Hallux Valgus in Osteoporosis.","authors":"J. Ruci, Eduart Gjika","doi":"10.32391/ajtes.v7i1.300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the surgical treatment in patients with osteoporosis with moderate or severe hallux valgus regarding the correction of Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA) and Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA) compared to non-osteoporotic patients. \nMaterials and Methods: The timeline of the study was from 2015 to 2020 with 20 patients with the mean age of 61.6±4.1 within the osteoporotic group and 63.5±5.0 within the non-osteoporotic group. 12 osteotomies in osteoporotic patients and eight osteotomies in non-osteoporotic patients were seen at follow-up after 2 years after surgery. Preoperative bone density of T-Score 2.5 SD or more below is named osteoporosis and IMA and was used to define patient groups; mild hallux valgus was defined with IMA of 11-16 degrees, moderate hallux valgus was defined with IMA from 16 to twenty degrees, and severe hallux valgus was defined with IMA from 20 degrees or more. \nResults: No statistical differences were found in HVA, IMA and between the osteoporotic patients and non-osteoporotic patients preoperatively, postoperatively, and therefore the final follow-up in mild to moderate hallux valgus. The mean AOFAS score ameliorated from 52.6 preoperatively to 89.1. Regarding satisfaction, ~ 83 you look after patients were very satisfied or satisfied. No evidence of complications and every one of the patients resulted with complete union of the osteotomy. \nConclusion: We believed that the surgical treatment is a safe, effective procedure for the correction of elderly patients with osteoporosis. In patients with moderate and severe hallux valgus the results of osteotomy have not any specific difference between the osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic groups","PeriodicalId":32905,"journal":{"name":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albanian Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32391/ajtes.v7i1.300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the surgical treatment in patients with osteoporosis with moderate or severe hallux valgus regarding the correction of Hallux Valgus Angle (HVA) and Intermetatarsal Angle (IMA) compared to non-osteoporotic patients. Materials and Methods: The timeline of the study was from 2015 to 2020 with 20 patients with the mean age of 61.6±4.1 within the osteoporotic group and 63.5±5.0 within the non-osteoporotic group. 12 osteotomies in osteoporotic patients and eight osteotomies in non-osteoporotic patients were seen at follow-up after 2 years after surgery. Preoperative bone density of T-Score 2.5 SD or more below is named osteoporosis and IMA and was used to define patient groups; mild hallux valgus was defined with IMA of 11-16 degrees, moderate hallux valgus was defined with IMA from 16 to twenty degrees, and severe hallux valgus was defined with IMA from 20 degrees or more. Results: No statistical differences were found in HVA, IMA and between the osteoporotic patients and non-osteoporotic patients preoperatively, postoperatively, and therefore the final follow-up in mild to moderate hallux valgus. The mean AOFAS score ameliorated from 52.6 preoperatively to 89.1. Regarding satisfaction, ~ 83 you look after patients were very satisfied or satisfied. No evidence of complications and every one of the patients resulted with complete union of the osteotomy. Conclusion: We believed that the surgical treatment is a safe, effective procedure for the correction of elderly patients with osteoporosis. In patients with moderate and severe hallux valgus the results of osteotomy have not any specific difference between the osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic groups
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究的目的是评估与非骨质疏松患者相比,患有中度或重度拇外翻的骨质疏松患者在矫正拇外翻角(HVA)和跖骨间角(IMA)方面的手术治疗结果。材料和方法:该研究的时间线为2015年至2020年,骨质疏松组有20名患者,平均年龄为61.6±4.1,非骨质疏松组为63.5±5.0。在术后2年的随访中,骨质疏松患者中有12例截骨,非骨质疏松患者有8例截骨。术前T-Score 2.5 SD或以上的骨密度被称为骨质疏松症和IMA,用于定义患者组;轻度拇外翻的IMA定义为11-16度,中度拇外翻定义为16-20度,重度拇外翻则定义为20度或以上。结果:在HVA、IMA以及骨质疏松患者和非骨质疏松患者术前、术后以及轻度至中度拇外翻的最终随访中,均未发现统计学差异。AOFAS平均评分从术前的52.6分提高到89.1分。关于满意度,~83你照顾的病人非常满意或满意。没有并发症的证据,每个患者的截骨都完全愈合。结论:手术治疗老年骨质疏松症是一种安全、有效的治疗方法。中度和重度拇外翻患者的截骨结果在骨质疏松组和非骨质疏松组之间没有任何特定差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Liver Abscess after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. A Case Report. Study Size Impact on Accuracy of the Worldwide Incidence of Pilonidal Sinus Management of Periarthritis Shoulder by Intra-Articular Steroid Injection and Shoulder Joint Manipulation Complications of Implantation of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Wernicke’s Encephalopathy from Hyperemesis Gravidarum. A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1