Contemporary trends and ethical concerns in clinical photography in Saudi Arabia: A preliminary study

Q3 Health Professions Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_143_20
A. Jamal, K. A. Al Ghamdi, Shabana Tharkar, Ibrahhem Al-Rabiah, M. Al-Shehri, Abdulmalik Al-Sahaf, Mohammed Al-Baz, Abdullah Al-Rowailey, Abdulrahman Al-Fowzan
{"title":"Contemporary trends and ethical concerns in clinical photography in Saudi Arabia: A preliminary study","authors":"A. Jamal, K. A. Al Ghamdi, Shabana Tharkar, Ibrahhem Al-Rabiah, M. Al-Shehri, Abdulmalik Al-Sahaf, Mohammed Al-Baz, Abdullah Al-Rowailey, Abdulrahman Al-Fowzan","doi":"10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_143_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Medical photography is imperative for maintaining documentation of patient records and aiding in diagnosis and management, research, education, and training. Smartphones have replaced conventional photography due to their ease of availability, accessibility, and storage; however, their use raises privacy and ethical concerns. The objective of the present study was to determine the current trends in clinical photography and to assess the ethical issues involved in this field. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was used to interview physicians registered at the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties. Data collection was performed using the SurveyMonkey platform, and the final sample included complete responses from 210 participants. Results: A total of 147 physicians (70%) reported taking clinical photographs. Personal smartphones were the most common device used by 116 (79%) physicians, and 43 (29.3%) reported also using hospital cameras for photographing their patients. Patient visit follow-ups and medical education/training were the most popular reasons for clinical photography. Access to these devices was not well secured, with only 42 (28.6%) physicians reporting storing them in a separate folder with a password. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in consent-taking practices between male and female patients and in the cross-analysis between physicians' and patients' genders. However, significant differences were obtained in the method of consent for identifiable and nonidentifiable photographs, with written consent preferred over verbal in identifiable photographs (P = 0.025). Common misuses included not obtaining proper consent before taking and while sharing the photographs, which raises serious privacy concerns. Patients' refusal to be photographed was the most common barrier reported by 55 (26.2%) physicians. Conclusions: Physicians mostly resorted to personal smartphones for capturing and storing patient photographs. This study identified a widespread prevalence of inadvertent practices related to inadequate consent, photograph sharing, and unsecured storage, which increases the risk of a breach of confidentiality. There is an urgent need to enforce standard guidelines and regulations addressing patients' privacy and ethical concerns involving digital photography in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":33866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"44 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_143_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Medical photography is imperative for maintaining documentation of patient records and aiding in diagnosis and management, research, education, and training. Smartphones have replaced conventional photography due to their ease of availability, accessibility, and storage; however, their use raises privacy and ethical concerns. The objective of the present study was to determine the current trends in clinical photography and to assess the ethical issues involved in this field. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was used to interview physicians registered at the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties. Data collection was performed using the SurveyMonkey platform, and the final sample included complete responses from 210 participants. Results: A total of 147 physicians (70%) reported taking clinical photographs. Personal smartphones were the most common device used by 116 (79%) physicians, and 43 (29.3%) reported also using hospital cameras for photographing their patients. Patient visit follow-ups and medical education/training were the most popular reasons for clinical photography. Access to these devices was not well secured, with only 42 (28.6%) physicians reporting storing them in a separate folder with a password. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in consent-taking practices between male and female patients and in the cross-analysis between physicians' and patients' genders. However, significant differences were obtained in the method of consent for identifiable and nonidentifiable photographs, with written consent preferred over verbal in identifiable photographs (P = 0.025). Common misuses included not obtaining proper consent before taking and while sharing the photographs, which raises serious privacy concerns. Patients' refusal to be photographed was the most common barrier reported by 55 (26.2%) physicians. Conclusions: Physicians mostly resorted to personal smartphones for capturing and storing patient photographs. This study identified a widespread prevalence of inadvertent practices related to inadequate consent, photograph sharing, and unsecured storage, which increases the risk of a breach of confidentiality. There is an urgent need to enforce standard guidelines and regulations addressing patients' privacy and ethical concerns involving digital photography in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯临床摄影的当代趋势和伦理问题:初步研究
目的:医学摄影对于保存病人记录和帮助诊断和管理、研究、教育和培训是必不可少的。智能手机已经取代了传统的摄影,因为它们易于获得、访问和存储;然而,它们的使用引发了隐私和道德方面的担忧。本研究的目的是确定临床摄影的当前趋势,并评估该领域涉及的伦理问题。方法:采用横断面调查对在沙特卫生专业委员会注册的医生进行访谈。使用SurveyMonkey平台进行数据收集,最终样本包括210名参与者的完整回答。结果:共有147名医生(70%)报告拍摄了临床照片。个人智能手机是116名(79%)医生最常用的设备,43名(29.3%)医生报告称也使用医院相机为病人拍照。患者访视随访和医学教育/培训是进行临床摄影最常见的原因。访问这些设备的安全性不高,只有42名(28.6%)医生报告说,他们将设备存储在一个单独的文件夹中,并设置了密码。此外,在男性和女性患者之间以及在医生和患者性别之间的交叉分析中,没有观察到显著差异。然而,在可识别照片和不可识别照片的同意方法上取得了显著差异,可识别照片的书面同意优于口头同意(P = 0.025)。常见的滥用包括在拍摄和分享照片之前没有得到适当的同意,这引起了严重的隐私问题。55名(26.2%)医生报告患者拒绝拍照是最常见的障碍。结论:医生大多使用个人智能手机来拍摄和存储患者照片。这项研究发现,与不充分的同意、照片共享和不安全的存储相关的无意行为普遍存在,这增加了违反保密的风险。迫切需要执行标准的指导方针和法规,以解决临床实践中涉及数字摄影的患者隐私和道德问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Menstrual Cycle Changes after the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Cross-sectional Study in Saudi Arabia The Use of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel as a Novel Combination for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Recurrent Complicated Abdominal Sarcoma: Case Report and Review of Literature Faculty Experiences: Virtual versus Traditional Problem-based Learning during COVID-19 in a Saudi Medical College CD4+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-treated Invasive Breast Cancer of No Special Type Evaluating the Novel Use of Unmanned Video Objective Structured Clinical Examination Stations in Pediatric Resident Training: Results and Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1