Patterns of up-to-date status for colorectal cancer screening in Alberta: a cross-sectional study using survey data

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20210051
K. Adhikari, Huiming Yang, G. Teare
{"title":"Patterns of up-to-date status for colorectal cancer screening in Alberta: a cross-sectional study using survey data","authors":"K. Adhikari, Huiming Yang, G. Teare","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20210051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Regular screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces its mortality. We explored patterns of use of different CRC screening modalities and quantified the association between having a regular primary care provider and being up to date for CRC screening in a community-based population in Alberta, Canada. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults between 50 and 74 years of age in Alberta, using Canadian Community Health Survey data (2015–2016). We defined being up to date for CRC screening as having completed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within the previous 2 years, or having a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy in the previous 5 years before the survey. We analyzed data using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Of 4600 surveyed adults, 62.6% were up to date for CRC screening, with 45.1% having completed a FIT or FOBT (45.1%), and 34.1% having undergone a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. The adjusted odds ratio of being up to date for CRC screening was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.17–0.38) and the absolute probability of being up to date for CRC screening was 34.4% lower for adults who had no regular primary care provider, compared with those who had. This pattern was observed in both male and female subgroups. Interpretation: Our findings suggest a suboptimal uptake of CRC screening overall in Alberta, with high disparity between adults with and without a regular primary care provider. The use of customized, multicomponent intervention strategies that are shown to be effective in increasing participation in CRC screening may address this issue.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20210051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Regular screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) reduces its mortality. We explored patterns of use of different CRC screening modalities and quantified the association between having a regular primary care provider and being up to date for CRC screening in a community-based population in Alberta, Canada. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults between 50 and 74 years of age in Alberta, using Canadian Community Health Survey data (2015–2016). We defined being up to date for CRC screening as having completed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) within the previous 2 years, or having a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy in the previous 5 years before the survey. We analyzed data using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Of 4600 surveyed adults, 62.6% were up to date for CRC screening, with 45.1% having completed a FIT or FOBT (45.1%), and 34.1% having undergone a colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. The adjusted odds ratio of being up to date for CRC screening was 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.17–0.38) and the absolute probability of being up to date for CRC screening was 34.4% lower for adults who had no regular primary care provider, compared with those who had. This pattern was observed in both male and female subgroups. Interpretation: Our findings suggest a suboptimal uptake of CRC screening overall in Alberta, with high disparity between adults with and without a regular primary care provider. The use of customized, multicomponent intervention strategies that are shown to be effective in increasing participation in CRC screening may address this issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔伯塔省结直肠癌筛查的最新状况模式:使用调查数据的横断面研究
背景:定期筛查癌症可降低其死亡率。我们在加拿大阿尔伯塔省的社区人群中探索了不同CRC筛查模式的使用模式,并量化了有正规初级保健提供者和最新CRC筛查之间的联系。方法:我们使用加拿大社区健康调查数据(2015-2016),对阿尔伯塔省50至74岁的成年人进行了一项横断面研究。我们将CRC筛查的最新定义为在前2年内完成粪便潜血试验(FOBT)或粪便免疫化学试验(FIT),或在调查前5年内进行结肠镜检查或乙状结肠镜检查。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型分析数据。结果:在4600名接受调查的成年人中,62.6%的人是最新的CRC筛查对象,45.1%的人完成了FIT或FOBT(45.1%),34.1%的人接受了结肠镜或乙状结肠镜检查。CRC筛查最新的调整后比值比为0.25(95%置信区间0.17-0.38),与有常规初级保健提供者的成年人相比,没有常规初级保健服务提供者的成年人最新CRC筛查的绝对概率低34.4%。在男性和女性亚组中都观察到了这种模式。解释:我们的研究结果表明,阿尔伯塔省对CRC筛查的总体接受率不理想,有和没有正规初级保健提供者的成年人之间差异很大。使用定制的多组分干预策略可以有效地增加CRC筛查的参与度,这可能会解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to "Validity of diagnoses of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canadian administrative health data: a multiprovince, population-based cohort study". Neighbourhood deprivation, distance to nearest comprehensive stroke centre and access to endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Social determinants of access to timely elective surgery in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional population level study. The success of publicly funded rotavirus vaccine programs for preventing community- and hospital-acquired rotavirus infections in Canadian pediatric hospitals: an observational study. Trends in hospital coding for people experiencing homelessness in Canada, 2015-2020: a descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1