Simulation Methods for Teaching Sampling Distributions: Should Hands-on Activities Precede the Computer?

IF 2.2 Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Statistics Education Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10691898.2020.1720551
Stacey A. Hancock, Wendy Rummerfield
{"title":"Simulation Methods for Teaching Sampling Distributions: Should Hands-on Activities Precede the Computer?","authors":"Stacey A. Hancock, Wendy Rummerfield","doi":"10.1080/10691898.2020.1720551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sampling distributions are fundamental to an understanding of statistical inference, yet research shows that students in introductory statistics courses tend to have multiple misconceptions of this important concept. A common instructional method used to address these misconceptions is computer simulation, often preceded by hands-on simulation activities. However, the results on computer simulation activities’ effects on student understanding of sampling distributions, and if hands-on simulation activities are necessary, are mixed. In this article, we describe an empirical intervention study in which each of eight discussion sections of an introductory statistics course at a large research university was assigned to one of two in-class activity sequences on sampling distributions: one consisting of computer simulation activities preceded by hands-on simulation using dice, cards, or tickets, and the other comprised of computer simulation alone with the same time-on-task. Using a longitudinal model of changes in standardized exam scores across three exams, we found significant evidence that students who took part in a hands-on activity before computer simulation had better improvement from the first midterm to the final exam, on average, compared to those who only did computer simulations. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.","PeriodicalId":45775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Statistics Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"17 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10691898.2020.1720551","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Statistics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1720551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Abstract Sampling distributions are fundamental to an understanding of statistical inference, yet research shows that students in introductory statistics courses tend to have multiple misconceptions of this important concept. A common instructional method used to address these misconceptions is computer simulation, often preceded by hands-on simulation activities. However, the results on computer simulation activities’ effects on student understanding of sampling distributions, and if hands-on simulation activities are necessary, are mixed. In this article, we describe an empirical intervention study in which each of eight discussion sections of an introductory statistics course at a large research university was assigned to one of two in-class activity sequences on sampling distributions: one consisting of computer simulation activities preceded by hands-on simulation using dice, cards, or tickets, and the other comprised of computer simulation alone with the same time-on-task. Using a longitudinal model of changes in standardized exam scores across three exams, we found significant evidence that students who took part in a hands-on activity before computer simulation had better improvement from the first midterm to the final exam, on average, compared to those who only did computer simulations. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学抽样分布的模拟方法:实践活动应该先于计算机吗?
抽样分布是理解统计推断的基础,然而研究表明,统计学入门课程的学生往往对这一重要概念有多种误解。解决这些误解的一种常见的教学方法是计算机模拟,通常在动手模拟活动之前进行。然而,计算机模拟活动对学生对抽样分布的理解的影响,以及如果有必要进行动手模拟活动,结果是混合的。在本文中,我们描述了一项实证干预研究,在该研究中,一所大型研究型大学的统计学入门课程的八个讨论部分中的每一个都被分配到两个关于抽样分布的课堂活动序列中的一个:一个由计算机模拟活动组成,在此之前使用骰子、卡片或门票进行实际模拟,另一个由计算机模拟单独组成,具有相同的任务时间。通过对三次考试中标准化考试成绩变化的纵向模型,我们发现了显著的证据,即在计算机模拟之前参加动手活动的学生从第一次期中考试到期末考试的平均成绩比只参加计算机模拟的学生有更好的提高。本文的补充材料可在网上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Statistics Education
Journal of Statistics Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The "Datasets and Stories" department of the Journal of Statistics Education provides a forum for exchanging interesting datasets and discussing ways they can be used effectively in teaching statistics. This section of JSE is described fully in the article "Datasets and Stories: Introduction and Guidelines" by Robin H. Lock and Tim Arnold (1993). The Journal of Statistics Education maintains a Data Archive that contains the datasets described in "Datasets and Stories" articles, as well as additional datasets useful to statistics teachers. Lock and Arnold (1993) describe several criteria that will be considered before datasets are placed in the JSE Data Archive.
期刊最新文献
Philosophy within Data Science Ethics Courses Teaching modeling in introductory statistics: A comparison of formula and tidyverse syntaxes Taking the Next Step in Exploring the Literary Digest 1936 Poll Open Case Studies: Statistics and Data Science Education through Real-World Applications Cultivating Critical Thinking Skills: a Pedagogical Study in a Business Statistics Course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1