The Discursive Construction of Risk: Social Work Knowledge Production and Criminalized Women

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK Social Service Review Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1086/710562
Sandra M. Leotti
{"title":"The Discursive Construction of Risk: Social Work Knowledge Production and Criminalized Women","authors":"Sandra M. Leotti","doi":"10.1086/710562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the concurrent phenomena of mass incarceration and neoliberal evolutions in the welfare state, it is inevitable that criminalized women will encounter social workers in their everyday lives. Under the conceptual lens of governmentality, social workers play a central role in reinforcing and interrupting processes of criminalization. This critical discourse analysis examines knowledge production in social work as an important site of engagement with criminalized women. Findings indicate that social work privileges a psychological discourse and that the logic of risk has supplanted holistic approaches to understanding criminalized women. This, I conclude, reflects a neoliberal political climate and aligns social work with carceral institutions in troubling ways. Although the discourse of risk seems firmly entrenched in the contemporary social work lexicon, it should not be treated as infallible or inevitable. This analysis propels a shift in emphasis toward discourses that invite political and ethical engagement with the carceral state.","PeriodicalId":47665,"journal":{"name":"Social Service Review","volume":"94 1","pages":"445 - 487"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/710562","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Service Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/710562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Given the concurrent phenomena of mass incarceration and neoliberal evolutions in the welfare state, it is inevitable that criminalized women will encounter social workers in their everyday lives. Under the conceptual lens of governmentality, social workers play a central role in reinforcing and interrupting processes of criminalization. This critical discourse analysis examines knowledge production in social work as an important site of engagement with criminalized women. Findings indicate that social work privileges a psychological discourse and that the logic of risk has supplanted holistic approaches to understanding criminalized women. This, I conclude, reflects a neoliberal political climate and aligns social work with carceral institutions in troubling ways. Although the discourse of risk seems firmly entrenched in the contemporary social work lexicon, it should not be treated as infallible or inevitable. This analysis propels a shift in emphasis toward discourses that invite political and ethical engagement with the carceral state.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风险的话语建构:社会工作知识生产与女性犯罪化
考虑到福利国家中大规模监禁和新自由主义演变的同时现象,被定罪的妇女在日常生活中不可避免地会遇到社会工作者。在治理的概念镜头下,社会工作者在加强和中断刑事定罪过程中发挥着核心作用。这一批判性话语分析将社会工作中的知识生产作为与犯罪妇女接触的重要场所。研究结果表明,社会工作以心理话语为特权,风险逻辑已经取代了理解犯罪妇女的整体方法。我的结论是,这反映了一种新自由主义的政治气候,并以令人不安的方式将社会工作与收容机构联系在一起。尽管风险的话语似乎在当代社会工作词汇中根深蒂固,但它不应该被视为绝对正确或不可避免的。这种分析推动了一种重点转向邀请政治和伦理参与的话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Service Review
Social Service Review SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Founded in 1927, Social Service Review is devoted to the publication of thought-provoking, original research on social welfare policy, organization, and practice. Articles in the Review analyze issues from the points of view of various disciplines, theories, and methodological traditions, view critical problems in context, and carefully consider long-range solutions. The Review features balanced, scholarly contributions from social work and social welfare scholars, as well as from members of the various allied disciplines engaged in research on human behavior, social systems, history, public policy, and social services.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of brain activation and functional outcomes between physical and virtual reality box and block test: a case study. Economic Outcomes of Shared Placement among Divorced Mothers in Wisconsin Unusual Branchial Cleft Cyst at Parapharyngeal Space: Case Report and a Review of Literature. Social Work and the Platform Economy: A Labor Process Theory Analysis Of the State, against the State: Public Defenders, Street-Level Bureaucracy, and Discretion in Criminal Court
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1