Effect of impact velocity on molten aluminum and copper droplets igniting expanded polystyrene foam

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 安全科学与韧性(英文) Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.09.005
Wenjie Yang, Rui Yang, Zishan Gao, Zhenxiang Tao, Jian Wang
{"title":"Effect of impact velocity on molten aluminum and copper droplets igniting expanded polystyrene foam","authors":"Wenjie Yang,&nbsp;Rui Yang,&nbsp;Zishan Gao,&nbsp;Zhenxiang Tao,&nbsp;Jian Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hot molten metal droplets with high fire hazard can easily ignite combustibles. Molten metal kinetics on the surface of a combustible material directly affects the ignition likelihood. Existing research focuses on the behavior of droplets during collisions, rarely addressing the ignition of combustibles by hot metal droplets. Here, the mechanisms of aluminum and copper droplets impinging on and igniting extended polystyrene (EPS) foam boards at different velocities were investigated. The relationship between the critical ignition temperature and impact velocity of droplets with diameters of 6 and 8 mm was experimentally studied for aluminum droplets; the critical ignition temperature non-monotonically depended on the impact velocity. For copper droplets, the relationship between the ignition probability and the impact velocity of droplets with diameters in the 3.5–7 mm range was experimentally studied. The most obvious difference between the two droplet ignition types was that the impact of copper droplets was accompanied by intense splashing, and the fragmentation extent positively correlated with the impact velocity. It was challenging to ignite using completely broken copper droplets. Droplets with the diameter of 5 mm were the most dangerous under the experimental conditions of this study, because the foam could still be ignited at higher impact velocities. Numerical simulations suggested that the main factors explaining the critical ignition temperature of aluminum droplets were gas mixing and splat cooling. The main factor affecting the ignition of copper droplets was fragmentation, and experimental observations were explained using non-dimensional droplet fragmentation theories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 9-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449622000536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hot molten metal droplets with high fire hazard can easily ignite combustibles. Molten metal kinetics on the surface of a combustible material directly affects the ignition likelihood. Existing research focuses on the behavior of droplets during collisions, rarely addressing the ignition of combustibles by hot metal droplets. Here, the mechanisms of aluminum and copper droplets impinging on and igniting extended polystyrene (EPS) foam boards at different velocities were investigated. The relationship between the critical ignition temperature and impact velocity of droplets with diameters of 6 and 8 mm was experimentally studied for aluminum droplets; the critical ignition temperature non-monotonically depended on the impact velocity. For copper droplets, the relationship between the ignition probability and the impact velocity of droplets with diameters in the 3.5–7 mm range was experimentally studied. The most obvious difference between the two droplet ignition types was that the impact of copper droplets was accompanied by intense splashing, and the fragmentation extent positively correlated with the impact velocity. It was challenging to ignite using completely broken copper droplets. Droplets with the diameter of 5 mm were the most dangerous under the experimental conditions of this study, because the foam could still be ignited at higher impact velocities. Numerical simulations suggested that the main factors explaining the critical ignition temperature of aluminum droplets were gas mixing and splat cooling. The main factor affecting the ignition of copper droplets was fragmentation, and experimental observations were explained using non-dimensional droplet fragmentation theories.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冲击速度对铝和铜熔滴点燃膨胀聚苯乙烯泡沫的影响
具有高火灾危险性的热熔融金属液滴很容易点燃可燃物。可燃材料表面的熔融金属动力学直接影响着火的可能性。现有的研究侧重于液滴在碰撞过程中的行为,很少涉及热金属液滴点燃可燃物的问题。本文研究了铝和铜液滴在不同速度下撞击和点燃扩展聚苯乙烯(EPS)泡沫板的机理。实验研究了铝液滴的临界点火温度与直径为6mm和8mm液滴冲击速度之间的关系;临界点火温度与冲击速度呈非单调关系。对于铜液滴,实验研究了直径在3.5–7 mm范围内的液滴的点火概率与冲击速度之间的关系。两种液滴点火类型之间最明显的差异是,铜液滴的撞击伴随着强烈的飞溅,碎片程度与撞击速度呈正相关。使用完全破碎的铜液滴点火具有挑战性。在本研究的实验条件下,直径为5毫米的液滴是最危险的,因为泡沫在更高的冲击速度下仍然可以被点燃。数值模拟表明,气体混合和飞溅冷却是影响铝液滴临界着火温度的主要因素。影响铜液滴点火的主要因素是碎片化,并用无量纲液滴碎片化理论解释了实验观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
期刊最新文献
Grasping emergency dynamics: A review of group evacuation techniques and strategies in major emergencies Multi-factor coupled forest fire model based on cellular automata Scenario construction and vulnerability assessment of natural hazards-triggered power grid accidents Risk assessment of fire casualty in underground commercial building based on FFTA-BN model Determination of individual disaster resilience levels of hospital staff: A case study of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1