Rebuke for the Ijtihad of the Prophet (Study of Q.S Al-Nisa’ [4]: 34 as a Verse ‘Itāb)

Syukron Affani
{"title":"Rebuke for the Ijtihad of the Prophet (Study of Q.S Al-Nisa’ [4]: 34 as a Verse ‘Itāb)","authors":"Syukron Affani","doi":"10.28918/religia.v24i2.2855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a human being, the Prophet was involved humanly in various dynamics of life. The Prophet used ijtihad reasoning and subjective tendencies, which are of course relative, in responding to life's problems. As a messenger of Allah, the actions and words of the Prophet are decisions for Muslims except for revelation with other provisions from Allah such as with Q.S al-Nisa ' 4:34; one of the verses that presents a lot controversial discussion. The Prophet's decision to qiṣāṣ a husband who committed violence against his wife, his passion is to provide justice and protection to women, but the decision was overturned by Q.S al-Nisa ' 4:34 which came down with other provisions as well as nuances of reprimand to the Prophet. The problem to be revealed in this paper is why Q.S al-Nisa ' 4:34 intervened in the Prophet's decision in responding to domestic violence. This research is a qualitative library research. The method of description is descriptive-analytical, which explains the basic construction of the Prophet's ijtihad and the significance of Q.S al-Nisa 4:34 to be analyzed using a historical-hermeneutical approach. The general conclusion from this paper is that Q.S al-Nisa' [4]: 34 places the issue of household and gender relations in the perspective of a social order that has been widely applied. The decision of the Prophet's qiṣāṣ itself is not wrong but tark al-awlā (leaving a better thing) because it can actually increase the escalation of domestic conflicts in patriarchal society.","PeriodicalId":31647,"journal":{"name":"Religia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v24i2.2855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a human being, the Prophet was involved humanly in various dynamics of life. The Prophet used ijtihad reasoning and subjective tendencies, which are of course relative, in responding to life's problems. As a messenger of Allah, the actions and words of the Prophet are decisions for Muslims except for revelation with other provisions from Allah such as with Q.S al-Nisa ' 4:34; one of the verses that presents a lot controversial discussion. The Prophet's decision to qiṣāṣ a husband who committed violence against his wife, his passion is to provide justice and protection to women, but the decision was overturned by Q.S al-Nisa ' 4:34 which came down with other provisions as well as nuances of reprimand to the Prophet. The problem to be revealed in this paper is why Q.S al-Nisa ' 4:34 intervened in the Prophet's decision in responding to domestic violence. This research is a qualitative library research. The method of description is descriptive-analytical, which explains the basic construction of the Prophet's ijtihad and the significance of Q.S al-Nisa 4:34 to be analyzed using a historical-hermeneutical approach. The general conclusion from this paper is that Q.S al-Nisa' [4]: 34 places the issue of household and gender relations in the perspective of a social order that has been widely applied. The decision of the Prophet's qiṣāṣ itself is not wrong but tark al-awlā (leaving a better thing) because it can actually increase the escalation of domestic conflicts in patriarchal society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对先知伊智提哈德的斥责(Q.S al - nisa[€™[4]:34]作为一节经文的研究 ItÄ ' b)
作为一个人类,先知以人类的方式参与了生命的各种动态。先知运用伊智提哈德的推理和主观倾向来回应生活中的问题,当然这些都是相对的。作为安拉的使者,先知的行为和言语是穆斯林的决定,除了真主的启示和其他规定,如古兰经4:34;其中一节经文引发了很多争议性的讨论。先知决定qi¹£Ä´¹£一个对妻子施暴的丈夫,他的热情是为妇女提供正义和保护,但这一决定被qs al-Nisa ' 4:34推翻,该决定与其他规定以及对先知的细微谴责一起被推翻。本文要揭示的问题是,为什么Q.S al-Nisa的4:34干预了先知应对家庭暴力的决定。本研究是一个定性的图书馆研究。描述的方法是描述-分析,它解释了先知伊智提哈德的基本结构和用历史解释学的方法分析古兰经4:34的意义。本文的总体结论是,Q.S al-Nisa的bb[0: 34]将家庭和性别关系问题置于已被广泛应用的社会秩序的角度。先知的qi¹£Ä´¹£的决定本身并没有错,而是tark al-awlÄ´(留下一个更好的东西),因为它实际上会增加父权社会中家庭冲突的升级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Environmental Ethics From Perspective Of The Quran And Sunnah Soul Dimension and Antithesis of Ibnu Sina’s Reincarnation Concept “Stay at Home, Obey Sunnah”: Construction of Women's Piety Through QS. al-Ahzab verse 33 in TikTok Social Media Post Islamic Moderation of Ibn Rushd’s Thoughts to Counter Radicalism in Indonesia The Concept of Sufism by Al-Muhasibi and Al-Ghazali (Intertextuality Studies of Al-Washaya and Al-Munqidz min Al-Dhalal)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1