The Relation between the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Special Education Research: A Systematic Review

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH American Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-04-16 DOI:10.1086/713825
Marian Lewis, Megan M. Burke, Janet R. Decker
{"title":"The Relation between the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Special Education Research: A Systematic Review","authors":"Marian Lewis, Megan M. Burke, Janet R. Decker","doi":"10.1086/713825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) delineates much of the substantive and procedural dimensions of special education practice, it seems logical that IDEA should be an integral part of special education research. Yet, to what extent do special education researchers discuss IDEA? In this study, we systematically reviewed every article published in a 10-year time frame in three special education journals (N = 887). Only 23.1% of the articles had explicit implications for IDEA. Most implications were tied to the compliance of IDEA as opposed to how IDEA could be improved. The disconnect between research and law has significant implications for research, policy, and practice.","PeriodicalId":47629,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education","volume":"127 1","pages":"345 - 368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713825","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/713825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Because the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) delineates much of the substantive and procedural dimensions of special education practice, it seems logical that IDEA should be an integral part of special education research. Yet, to what extent do special education researchers discuss IDEA? In this study, we systematically reviewed every article published in a 10-year time frame in three special education journals (N = 887). Only 23.1% of the articles had explicit implications for IDEA. Most implications were tied to the compliance of IDEA as opposed to how IDEA could be improved. The disconnect between research and law has significant implications for research, policy, and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《残疾人教育法》与特殊教育研究的关系——系统综述
由于《残疾人教育法》(IDEA)规定了特殊教育实践的许多实质和程序层面,因此,IDEA应该成为特殊教育研究的一个组成部分似乎是合乎逻辑的。然而,特殊教育研究人员在多大程度上讨论IDEA?在这项研究中,我们系统地回顾了在10年时间内发表在三本特殊教育期刊上的每一篇文章(N=887)。只有23.1%的文章对IDEA有明确的影响。大多数影响都与IDEA的合规性有关,而不是如何改进IDEA。研究与法律之间的脱节对研究、政策和实践具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Education
American Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Founded as School Review in 1893, the American Journal of Education acquired its present name in November 1979. The Journal seeks to bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of educational scholarship, and to encourage a vigorous dialogue between educational scholars and practitioners. To achieve that goal, papers are published that present research, theoretical statements, philosophical arguments, critical syntheses of a field of educational inquiry, and integrations of educational scholarship, policy, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Cultivating Critical Hope While Leading during Crisis: A Qualitative Cross-Comparative Analysis The Persistence of and Challenges to Whiteness in Parent Engagement The Power of the Inner Voice: Examining Self-Talk’s Relationship with Academic Outcomes “Figuring Out My Part in All of This”: Understanding Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Shaping Teacher Learning within Reform Breaking the Mold: The One Social Class Model and Saving Face among Undocumented and Mixed-Status Chinese Immigrant Families
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1