Visual uncertainty models through the political lens of the visual arts in the eras of Bush and Trump

Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Visual Literacy Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI:10.1080/1051144X.2019.1611699
A. Friedman
{"title":"Visual uncertainty models through the political lens of the visual arts in the eras of Bush and Trump","authors":"A. Friedman","doi":"10.1080/1051144X.2019.1611699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In today’s political and rhetorical landscape, many politicians use Twitter as their communication platform of choice. President Donald Trump is one of the best-known Twitter users. The media often analyze Trump’s tweets, and several artists have attempted to interpret them through visualizations. One of the leading visual artists to do so is Erin Gallagher. During the presidency of George W. Bush, visualization was also used to interpret political messages, specifically in work by Mark Lombardi. As controversy surrounding social media’s truthfulness has escalated, it seems useful to consider how visual uncertainty has been treated in work by Lombardi and Gallagher. This study asks the following questions: What do these the two leading approaches to visual uncertainty contribute to an examination of works by Erin Gallagher and Mark Lombardi? What does a theoretical analysis reveal about common design features in the work of these artists? The comparison undertaken here shows that, regarding visual precision and credibility, it is difficult to evaluate Gallagher’s work. Future studies should examine whether visual grammar theory can add more insight into these artists’ visual arguments.","PeriodicalId":36535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Literacy","volume":"38 1","pages":"324 - 334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1051144X.2019.1611699","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2019.1611699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In today’s political and rhetorical landscape, many politicians use Twitter as their communication platform of choice. President Donald Trump is one of the best-known Twitter users. The media often analyze Trump’s tweets, and several artists have attempted to interpret them through visualizations. One of the leading visual artists to do so is Erin Gallagher. During the presidency of George W. Bush, visualization was also used to interpret political messages, specifically in work by Mark Lombardi. As controversy surrounding social media’s truthfulness has escalated, it seems useful to consider how visual uncertainty has been treated in work by Lombardi and Gallagher. This study asks the following questions: What do these the two leading approaches to visual uncertainty contribute to an examination of works by Erin Gallagher and Mark Lombardi? What does a theoretical analysis reveal about common design features in the work of these artists? The comparison undertaken here shows that, regarding visual precision and credibility, it is difficult to evaluate Gallagher’s work. Future studies should examine whether visual grammar theory can add more insight into these artists’ visual arguments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过布什和特朗普时代视觉艺术的政治镜头,视觉不确定性模型
摘要在当今的政治和修辞环境中,许多政客选择推特作为他们的沟通平台。唐纳德·特朗普总统是最知名的推特用户之一。媒体经常分析特朗普的推文,几位艺术家试图通过可视化来解读这些推文。Erin Gallagher是其中一位杰出的视觉艺术家。在乔治·W·布什担任总统期间,可视化也被用来解释政治信息,特别是在马克·隆巴迪的工作中。随着围绕社交媒体真实性的争议不断升级,考虑一下隆巴迪和加拉格尔在工作中如何处理视觉不确定性似乎很有用。这项研究提出了以下问题:这两种主要的视觉不确定性方法对Erin Gallagher和Mark Lombardi的作品有什么影响?理论分析揭示了这些艺术家作品中常见的设计特征是什么?这里进行的比较表明,就视觉精度和可信度而言,很难评估加拉格尔的作品。未来的研究应该考察视觉语法理论是否能为这些艺术家的视觉论点提供更多的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Literacy
Journal of Visual Literacy Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Transformative pedagogy and visual Literacy: reframing art and design student perspectives on sustainability with illustrated infographics Infographic creation as an essential skill for highly visual Gen Alpha Integration of infographics in higher education: challenges faced by novice creators A bibliometric exploration of infographics as tools for visual literacy in education Individual and collaborative infographic design and cognitive strategies in visual literacy support process: a qualitative research perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1