Taxonomies of sustainable investment and existing decision support approaches of EIA, SEA and CBA – a silver bullet for sustainable development? A response to Dusík and Bond

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal Pub Date : 2022-01-31 DOI:10.1080/14615517.2022.2033926
T. Fischer
{"title":"Taxonomies of sustainable investment and existing decision support approaches of EIA, SEA and CBA – a silver bullet for sustainable development? A response to Dusík and Bond","authors":"T. Fischer","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2022.2033926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this response to Dusík and Bond, I reflect on what taxonomies of sustainable investment will need to be able to deliver in order to add value to our existing efforts towards making development more environmentally sustainable. What support taxonomies should provide for strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of policies, plans and programmes and environmental impact assessment (EIA) of projects, as well as for cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of policies, plans, programmes and projects is discussed. In this context, I focus on the consideration of climate change and biodiversity as important examples. Exploring a (typical) real-life road infrastructure planning case, I depict some of the existing challenges for SEA and EIA as well as CBA. I conclude that if the use of taxonomies leads to CBA which is not corrupted by powerful (industry) interests and which can result in realistic estimations of costs and benefits as well as to SEA and EIA applications whose results that are not traded-off with alleged economic advantages, they would indeed be highly beneficial.","PeriodicalId":47528,"journal":{"name":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","volume":"40 1","pages":"118 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2022.2033926","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this response to Dusík and Bond, I reflect on what taxonomies of sustainable investment will need to be able to deliver in order to add value to our existing efforts towards making development more environmentally sustainable. What support taxonomies should provide for strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of policies, plans and programmes and environmental impact assessment (EIA) of projects, as well as for cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of policies, plans, programmes and projects is discussed. In this context, I focus on the consideration of climate change and biodiversity as important examples. Exploring a (typical) real-life road infrastructure planning case, I depict some of the existing challenges for SEA and EIA as well as CBA. I conclude that if the use of taxonomies leads to CBA which is not corrupted by powerful (industry) interests and which can result in realistic estimations of costs and benefits as well as to SEA and EIA applications whose results that are not traded-off with alleged economic advantages, they would indeed be highly beneficial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续投资的分类和现有的EIA、SEA和CBA决策支持方法——可持续发展的银弹?对Dusík和Bond的回应
在对Dusík和Bond的回应中,我反思了可持续投资的哪些分类需要能够提供,以便为我们现有的努力增加价值,使发展更加环境可持续。讨论了分类法应如何支持政策、计划和方案的策略性环境评估和项目的环境影响评估,以及政策、计划、方案和项目的成本效益分析。在此背景下,我将重点考虑气候变化和生物多样性作为重要例子。通过一个(典型的)现实生活中的道路基础设施规划案例,我描述了环评和环评以及CBA面临的一些挑战。我的结论是,如果分类法的使用导致CBA不被强大的(行业)利益所腐化,并且可以导致对成本和收益的现实估计,以及SEA和EIA应用的结果不与所谓的经济优势相权衡,那么它们确实是非常有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
22.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This is the international, peer-reviewed journal of the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA). It covers environmental, social, health and other impact assessments, cost-benefit analysis, technology assessment, and other approaches to anticipating and managing impacts. It has readers in universities, government and public agencies, consultancies, NGOs and elsewhere in over 100 countries. It has editorials, main articles, book reviews, and a professional practice section.
期刊最新文献
A game theoretic decision-making approach to reduce mine closure risks throughout the mine-life cycle Consideration of risks to people and the environment related to accidents on natural gas transmission pipelines in LUP and SEA processes in Poland Landscape, EIA and decision-making. A case study of the Vistula Spit Canal, Poland SEA and EIA: uncertain boundaries in Spain Influence factors on the quality of regulatory impact analysis in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1