Satisfaction of business students with the quality of classes during the pandemic: A mixed study in the Latin American context.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Comparative and International Education Pub Date : 2022-09-05 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1177/17454999221113125
Lida Esperanza Villa-Castaño, William Fernando Durán León
{"title":"Satisfaction of business students with the quality of classes during the pandemic: A mixed study in the Latin American context.","authors":"Lida Esperanza Villa-Castaño, William Fernando Durán León","doi":"10.1177/17454999221113125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency remote education (ERD) adopted by universities amidst the COVID-19 pandemic has pursued to maintain students' satisfaction. The current research inquiries into perception of the satisfaction towards the quality of classes during ERD. The research is carried out through a mixed sequential approach. Six focus groups in its qualitative phase, and 2074 students from the business undergraduate program in Colombia, Peru, and Mexico in its quantitative phase. Measure of satisfaction towards ERD establishes three dimensions: Concerns about academic quality, teaching strategies used by professors, and perceptions of access limitations. This study identifies a moderating effect of the perceptions of access limitations on the relationship of the teaching strategies and concerns about academic quality. In high constraints, =.-016, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, the relationship is weaker than medium constraints, = -0.22, <i>p</i> < 0.0001. In turn, the medium access limitation condition shows a weaker effect than the high limitation condition, = -0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.0001.</p>","PeriodicalId":45946,"journal":{"name":"Research in Comparative and International Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"548-565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999221113125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency remote education (ERD) adopted by universities amidst the COVID-19 pandemic has pursued to maintain students' satisfaction. The current research inquiries into perception of the satisfaction towards the quality of classes during ERD. The research is carried out through a mixed sequential approach. Six focus groups in its qualitative phase, and 2074 students from the business undergraduate program in Colombia, Peru, and Mexico in its quantitative phase. Measure of satisfaction towards ERD establishes three dimensions: Concerns about academic quality, teaching strategies used by professors, and perceptions of access limitations. This study identifies a moderating effect of the perceptions of access limitations on the relationship of the teaching strategies and concerns about academic quality. In high constraints, =.-016, p < 0.0001, the relationship is weaker than medium constraints, = -0.22, p < 0.0001. In turn, the medium access limitation condition shows a weaker effect than the high limitation condition, = -0.28, p < 0.0001.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疫情期间商科学生对课程质量的满意度:拉丁美洲背景下的混合研究
新冠肺炎大流行期间,大学采用紧急远程教育(ERD)来保持学生的满意度。本研究旨在探讨ERD期间学生对课程质量的满意度。这项研究是通过混合顺序方法进行的。六个重点小组处于定性阶段,2074名来自哥伦比亚、秘鲁和墨西哥的商科本科生处于定量阶段。对ERD的满意度测量建立了三个维度:对学术质量的关注、教授使用的教学策略以及对访问限制的看法。本研究确定了访问限制的认知对教学策略和对学术质量的关注之间的关系的调节作用。在高约束条件下,=-016,p<0.0001,该关系弱于中等约束,=−0.22,p<.0001。反过来,中等访问限制条件显示出比高限制条件更弱的影响,=-0.28,p<0.0001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Comparative and International Education
Research in Comparative and International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Research in Comparative and International Education is a peer-reviewed international journal, edited by Hubert Ertl of the University of Oxford, assisted by an Editorial Board and an International Advisory Board of international scholars with a wide range of expertise in comparative and international studies.
期刊最新文献
The adoption of dual Vocational Education and Training in Spain: Analysis of descentralised decision-making in educational policy transfer International partnership of Japanese university: Reciprocity and stratification of study abroad Factors that play a role in international PhD candidates’ social experiences with inclusion and integration in an international learning environment: A narrative inquiry in a Dutch research university Lifelong education policies in Europe and Latin America Looking at Ukrainian technical and vocational education and training before the war: Consequences of a meritocratic orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1