Neo-Triple Helix Model of Innovation Ecosystems: Integrating Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Models

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Triple Helix Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI:10.1163/21971927-bja10029
Yuzhuo Cai
{"title":"Neo-Triple Helix Model of Innovation Ecosystems: Integrating Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Models","authors":"Yuzhuo Cai","doi":"10.1163/21971927-bja10029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article proposes the neo-Triple Helix model of innovation ecosystems by integrating the Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models, inspired by Lewontin’s gene, organism and environment Triple Helix metaphor. The model considers innovation ecosystems evolved through interactions between 1) innovation dynamics (or innovation genes), 2) social structures and 3) the natural environment. The systems include two-layer triple helix interactions (or triads): university, industry and government at the gene level, and innovation genes, social structures and the natural environment at the system level. Innovation dynamics are conceptualised by integrating the neo-institutional and neo-evolutionary perspectives of the Triple Helix model. The dialectical relationships between innovation genes, social structures and the natural environment are primarily explained using aspects of the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models. The neo-Triple Helix model clarifies debates on different helix innovation models, advances helical approaches through synergy building and can guide empirical research and policy design on innovation ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":31161,"journal":{"name":"Triple Helix","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Triple Helix","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This article proposes the neo-Triple Helix model of innovation ecosystems by integrating the Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models, inspired by Lewontin’s gene, organism and environment Triple Helix metaphor. The model considers innovation ecosystems evolved through interactions between 1) innovation dynamics (or innovation genes), 2) social structures and 3) the natural environment. The systems include two-layer triple helix interactions (or triads): university, industry and government at the gene level, and innovation genes, social structures and the natural environment at the system level. Innovation dynamics are conceptualised by integrating the neo-institutional and neo-evolutionary perspectives of the Triple Helix model. The dialectical relationships between innovation genes, social structures and the natural environment are primarily explained using aspects of the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix models. The neo-Triple Helix model clarifies debates on different helix innovation models, advances helical approaches through synergy building and can guide empirical research and policy design on innovation ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新生态系统的新三重螺旋模型:三重、四重和五重螺旋模型的集成
本文以Lewontin的基因、有机体和环境三重螺旋隐喻为灵感,结合三重、四重和五重螺旋模型,提出了创新生态系统的新三重螺旋模型。该模型考虑了创新生态系统是通过1)创新动力(或创新基因)、2)社会结构和3)自然环境之间的相互作用进化而来的。这些系统包括两层三螺旋相互作用(或三元):基因层面的大学、工业和政府,以及系统层面的创新基因、社会结构和自然环境。创新动力是通过整合三重螺旋模型的新制度和新进化视角来概念化的。创新基因、社会结构和自然环境之间的辩证关系主要用四元组和五元组螺旋模型来解释。新三重螺旋模型澄清了关于不同螺旋创新模型的争论,通过协同构建推进螺旋方法,并可以指导创新生态系统的实证研究和政策设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Triple Helix
Triple Helix Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
46.20%
发文量
14
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Key Factors for a Successful Technology Transfer Process of Digital Innovation Assets University-Industry Relationships beyond Technology Transfer: the Role of Intangible Knowledge Demand-oriented Science and Technology Parks: a New Tool for Innovation Policy From the Triple Helix Model of Innovations to the Quantitative Theory of Meaning Measuring Innovation and Collaboration System using Big Data: A Case Study about Ho Chi Minh City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1