Behavioral outcome of oral midazolam premedication in pediatric dental general anesthesia: A systematic review

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of International Oral Health Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.4103/jioh.jioh_161_22
A. Hisham, Farah Mohamad, I. Ali, Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani, Wan Muhammad Wan Ahmad, N. Samsudin
{"title":"Behavioral outcome of oral midazolam premedication in pediatric dental general anesthesia: A systematic review","authors":"A. Hisham, Farah Mohamad, I. Ali, Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani, Wan Muhammad Wan Ahmad, N. Samsudin","doi":"10.4103/jioh.jioh_161_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This systematic review explores the postoperative behavior outcomes of oral midazolam (OM) premedication in pediatric dental general anesthesia (DGA). Premedication drug assists in the reduction of negative psychological impact during the general anesthesia induction, thus influence the behavior, particularly in pediatric patients. OM is one of the common premedications given due to its efficacy and well accepted administration. Materials and Methods: This review was registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Studies published in the databases including PubMed Central, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar and others between January 1980 and December 2020 were analyzed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Risks of bias and evidence levels were determined on each selected study. Results: Seven out of 6944 studies, were scrutinized for final analysis, which involved a total of 392 children in experimental groups and 89 children in placebo groups. OM had shown both positive and negative behavior outcomes post DGA using different assessment tools, in comparison to other premedications. It also showed less side effect post consumption. Conclusions: OM premedication demonstrated very limited evidence for positive behavior outcomes in pediatric DGA. The 0.5 mg/kg body weight dosage of midazolam yields the most favorable behavior postoperatively. Based on this collective review, there is still limited evidence for positive behavior outcomes in OM premedication.","PeriodicalId":16138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Oral Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_161_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This systematic review explores the postoperative behavior outcomes of oral midazolam (OM) premedication in pediatric dental general anesthesia (DGA). Premedication drug assists in the reduction of negative psychological impact during the general anesthesia induction, thus influence the behavior, particularly in pediatric patients. OM is one of the common premedications given due to its efficacy and well accepted administration. Materials and Methods: This review was registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Studies published in the databases including PubMed Central, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar and others between January 1980 and December 2020 were analyzed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Risks of bias and evidence levels were determined on each selected study. Results: Seven out of 6944 studies, were scrutinized for final analysis, which involved a total of 392 children in experimental groups and 89 children in placebo groups. OM had shown both positive and negative behavior outcomes post DGA using different assessment tools, in comparison to other premedications. It also showed less side effect post consumption. Conclusions: OM premedication demonstrated very limited evidence for positive behavior outcomes in pediatric DGA. The 0.5 mg/kg body weight dosage of midazolam yields the most favorable behavior postoperatively. Based on this collective review, there is still limited evidence for positive behavior outcomes in OM premedication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童牙科全麻术前口服咪达唑仑的行为结果:一项系统综述
目的:本系统综述探讨儿童牙科全麻(DGA)术前口服咪达唑仑(OM)的术后行为结果。用药前药物有助于减少全麻诱导过程中的负面心理影响,从而影响行为,尤其是在儿科患者中。OM是一种常见的药物治疗,因为它的疗效和广泛接受的给药。材料和方法:本综述在国际前瞻性系统综述登记册(PROSPERO)下注册。使用系统综述和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南对1980年1月至2020年12月期间发表在PubMed Central、Cochrane、Web of Science、Google Scholar等数据库中的研究进行了分析。每个选定的研究都确定了偏倚的风险和证据水平。结果:6944项研究中有7项进行了最终分析,共涉及392名实验组儿童和89名安慰剂组儿童。OM在DGA后使用不同的评估工具,与其他术前相比,显示了积极和消极的行为结果。它也显示出较少的副作用后消费。结论:OM术前用药证明儿童DGA的积极行为结果的证据非常有限。0.5 mg/kg体重剂量的咪达唑仑在术后产生最有利的行为。基于这一集体综述,OM术前治疗中积极行为结果的证据仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Oral Health
Journal of International Oral Health Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: Preventive and Community Dentistry (Dental Public Health) Endodontics Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (also called Oral Surgery) Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics Periodontology (also called Periodontics) Pediatric Dentistry (also called Pedodontics) Prosthodontics (also called Prosthetic Dentistry) Oral Medicine Special Needs Dentistry (also called Special Care Dentistry) Oral Biology Forensic Odontology Geriatric Dentistry or Geriodontics Implantology Laser and Aesthetic Dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Safety of E-cigarettes and its effectiveness in smoking cessation: A systematic review Comparative estimation of C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen levels in gingival crevicular fluid in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with chronic periodontitis: A prospective clinical study Tooth movement in immune system: A narrative review Association between parental migration and dental caries of 3-12-year-old children in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis Palatogingival groove: Prevalence, characteristics and implications in a cross-sectional study in Rio de Janeiro-Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1