Who Was Callicles? Exploring Four Relationships between Rhetoric and Justice in Plato's Gorgias

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 LITERATURE PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2021-10-06 DOI:10.5325/philrhet.54.3.0263
Richard. Johnson-Sheehan
{"title":"Who Was Callicles? Exploring Four Relationships between Rhetoric and Justice in Plato's Gorgias","authors":"Richard. Johnson-Sheehan","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.3.0263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The Gorgias presents us with a mystery and an enigma: Who was Callicles? And, what was Plato trying to accomplish in this dialogue? While searching for the identity of Callicles, we gain a better understanding of Plato's purpose for this dialogue, which is to use justice as a means for staking out the boundaries of four types of rhetoric. This article argues that Plato uses the Gorgias to reveal the deficiencies of sophistic nomos-centered rhetorics and an unjust sophistic phusis-centered rhetoric, opening the door for a \"true\" rhetoric that he articulates in the Phaedrus and a universal justice based on virtue that he describes in the Republic.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.54.3.0263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:The Gorgias presents us with a mystery and an enigma: Who was Callicles? And, what was Plato trying to accomplish in this dialogue? While searching for the identity of Callicles, we gain a better understanding of Plato's purpose for this dialogue, which is to use justice as a means for staking out the boundaries of four types of rhetoric. This article argues that Plato uses the Gorgias to reveal the deficiencies of sophistic nomos-centered rhetorics and an unjust sophistic phusis-centered rhetoric, opening the door for a "true" rhetoric that he articulates in the Phaedrus and a universal justice based on virtue that he describes in the Republic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡利克勒斯是谁?柏拉图《高尔吉亚篇》中修辞与正义的四种关系探析
《高尔吉亚》给我们带来了一个谜:卡利克勒斯是谁?柏拉图在这段对话中想要达到什么目的?在寻找卡利克勒斯的身份时,我们更好地理解了柏拉图进行这段对话的目的,即利用正义作为一种手段,划定四种修辞的界限。本文认为,柏拉图用《高尔吉亚篇》揭示了以诺莫斯为中心的诡辩修辞学的缺陷和以弗斯为中心的不公正的诡辩修辞学,为他在《费德鲁斯篇》中阐述的“真正的”修辞学和他在《理想国》中描述的基于美德的普遍正义打开了大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Philosophy and Rhetoric is dedicated to publication of high-quality articles involving the relationship between philosophy and rhetoric. It has a longstanding commitment to interdisciplinary scholarship and welcomes all theoretical and methodological perspectives that advance the journal"s mission. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation, philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric with a strong philosophical emphasis, and philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric of other areas of human culture and thought, political theory and law.
期刊最新文献
Michel Foucault’s Rhetorical Practice: The 1961 Preface to History and Madness Lockean Natural History and the Revivification of Post-Truth Objects Revisiting Reverse Eikos: Dialectical Evaluation of a Rhetorical Argument The Genres of Swahili Philosophy Guest Editor's Introduction: The Time of Africana Philosophy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1