A Systematic Review of Teacher-Mediated Interventions to Improve the Mathematical Performance of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

IF 0.6 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Exceptionality Pub Date : 2020-03-14 DOI:10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717
Corey Peltier, Kimberly J. Vannest, Kristi L. Morin, Tracy E. Sinclair, M. Sallese
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Teacher-Mediated Interventions to Improve the Mathematical Performance of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","authors":"Corey Peltier, Kimberly J. Vannest, Kristi L. Morin, Tracy E. Sinclair, M. Sallese","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) demonstrate poor academic outcomes, particularly in mathematics. Student-mediated interventions (e.g., self-management, self-monitoring, self-instruction) are replete in the intervention literature base for students with EBD. However, teacher-mediated interventions have been examined less frequently. The goal of this project was to examine the literature on teacher-mediated interventions to improve the mathematical performance of students with EBD to identify what is known and gaps that need to be filled. A total of 17 studies including 47 students met inclusion criteria; however, only seven studies including 17 students met the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Pilot Single-Case Design Standards with or without reservations. Using the WWC Evidence Standards, six studies demonstrated moderate evidence of effect and one study demonstrated weak evidence. The omnibus Tau-U was 72% (CI95 62–82%), representing data from the seven studies that met the WWC Design Standards. We calculated the between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD) for four studies that met assumptions; the effect sizes ranged from 3.48 to 0.45. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"28 1","pages":"121 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) demonstrate poor academic outcomes, particularly in mathematics. Student-mediated interventions (e.g., self-management, self-monitoring, self-instruction) are replete in the intervention literature base for students with EBD. However, teacher-mediated interventions have been examined less frequently. The goal of this project was to examine the literature on teacher-mediated interventions to improve the mathematical performance of students with EBD to identify what is known and gaps that need to be filled. A total of 17 studies including 47 students met inclusion criteria; however, only seven studies including 17 students met the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Pilot Single-Case Design Standards with or without reservations. Using the WWC Evidence Standards, six studies demonstrated moderate evidence of effect and one study demonstrated weak evidence. The omnibus Tau-U was 72% (CI95 62–82%), representing data from the seven studies that met the WWC Design Standards. We calculated the between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD) for four studies that met assumptions; the effect sizes ranged from 3.48 to 0.45. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师干预对改善情绪与行为障碍学生数学成绩的系统评价
患有情绪和行为障碍(EBD)的学生表现出较差的学业成绩,特别是在数学方面。以学生为中介的干预措施(如自我管理、自我监控、自我指导)在EBD学生干预文献库中非常丰富。然而,教师介导的干预很少被检查。这个项目的目的是检查关于教师干预的文献,以提高EBD学生的数学表现,以确定已知的和需要填补的空白。共有17项研究包括47名学生符合纳入标准;然而,只有7项研究,包括17名学生,有保留地或没有保留地达到了What Works Clearinghouse (WWC)试点单一案例设计标准。根据世界卫生组织的证据标准,六项研究显示了中等程度的证据,一项研究显示了弱证据。综合Tau-U为72% (CI95 62-82%),代表了符合WWC设计标准的七项研究的数据。我们计算了四项符合假设的研究的病例间标准化平均差(BC-SMD);效应量为3.48 ~ 0.45。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality
Exceptionality EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Teachers of Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic The Effectiveness of Teaching High-Risk Cooking Skills with Video Models to Individuals with Intellectual Disability Legal Analysis of the Interpretation of Adapted Physical Education in US Law Examining Similarities and Differences in Parent Advocacy During Early Intervention and School Services What Does a Useful Practitioner Journal Article Look Like? Perceptions of Preservice Teacher Candidates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1