INTERVENTION OF RARELY SEEN CATHETER LOSS DURING PERMANENT TUNNELED HEMODIALYSIS CATHETERIZATION: A CASE REPORT

Sanamed Pub Date : 2020-06-21 DOI:10.24125/sanamed.v15i2.425
Emced Khalil
{"title":"INTERVENTION OF RARELY SEEN CATHETER LOSS DURING PERMANENT TUNNELED HEMODIALYSIS CATHETERIZATION: A CASE REPORT","authors":"Emced Khalil","doi":"10.24125/sanamed.v15i2.425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), permanent hemodialysis cathetersare often used by performing percutaneous catheterization to create a permanent vascular access. To the best of our knowledge, no cases with accidental loss of catheter piece during hemodialysis catheter replacement or during its retrieval under scopy has been reported in the literature yet. Case report: It was decided to retrieve the right permanent dialysis catheter of a 54-year-old woman, who had received a temporary dialysis catheter due to the development of catheter site infection in her 3 rd permanent catheter (the first two were changed due to thrombosis). Due to excess adhesion in the region, the retrieval of the catheter was complicated, only half of it (proximal piece after cutting into two) was removed, while the distal section slipped and migrated to the right subclavian vein, up to the right atrium.The diagnosis was confirmed by chest radiographs showing that the distal piece of the catheter piece was in the right subclavian vein and right atrium. The catheter piece was retrieved through a minor invasive procedure made possible by scopy without any further complications. Conclusion : Permanent dialysis catheters should ideally be placed under scopy. Also, when the retrieval of a catheter is planned, cutting from any part of the catheter should never be performed.","PeriodicalId":53269,"journal":{"name":"Sanamed","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanamed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24125/sanamed.v15i2.425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), permanent hemodialysis cathetersare often used by performing percutaneous catheterization to create a permanent vascular access. To the best of our knowledge, no cases with accidental loss of catheter piece during hemodialysis catheter replacement or during its retrieval under scopy has been reported in the literature yet. Case report: It was decided to retrieve the right permanent dialysis catheter of a 54-year-old woman, who had received a temporary dialysis catheter due to the development of catheter site infection in her 3 rd permanent catheter (the first two were changed due to thrombosis). Due to excess adhesion in the region, the retrieval of the catheter was complicated, only half of it (proximal piece after cutting into two) was removed, while the distal section slipped and migrated to the right subclavian vein, up to the right atrium.The diagnosis was confirmed by chest radiographs showing that the distal piece of the catheter piece was in the right subclavian vein and right atrium. The catheter piece was retrieved through a minor invasive procedure made possible by scopy without any further complications. Conclusion : Permanent dialysis catheters should ideally be placed under scopy. Also, when the retrieval of a catheter is planned, cutting from any part of the catheter should never be performed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
永久性隧道式血液透析置管中罕见导管丢失的干预1例
引言:在终末期肾病(ESRD)患者中,永久性血液透析导管通常通过进行经皮导管插入术来创建永久性血管通路。据我们所知,文献中尚未报道在血液透析导管更换过程中或在镜检下取出导管时导管片意外丢失的病例。病例报告:决定取回一名54岁女性的右侧永久性透析导管,该女性因第3根永久性导管中的导管部位感染而接受了临时透析导管(前两根因血栓形成而更换)。由于该区域的过度粘连,导管的取出很复杂,只有一半(切成两半后的近端)被取出,而远端部分滑动并转移到右锁骨下静脉,直到右心房。胸部X线片显示导管片的远端位于右锁骨下静脉和右心房,从而证实了诊断。导管片是通过微创手术取出的,该微创手术通过镜检实现,没有任何进一步的并发症。结论:理想情况下应将永久性透析导管置于镜下。此外,当计划取回导管时,不得从导管的任何部分进行切割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benefits of breastfeedinig for mother and child Physician burnout levels and associated factors in The Covid-19 pandemic Improvement of medical waste storage procedures Early detection of acute kidney injury in preterm newborns with perinatal asphyxia using serum cystatin Differences between biochemical, hematological, and coagulation parameters among patients with mild and severe COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1