Impacts of Budget Transparency on Economic and Political Outcomes

IF 0.3 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Croatian and Comparative Public Administration Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.31297/hkju.22.4.4
Simona Prijaković
{"title":"Impacts of Budget Transparency on Economic and Political Outcomes","authors":"Simona Prijaković","doi":"10.31297/hkju.22.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"his article focuses on a review of literature on the impacts of budget/fiscal transparency on economic and political outcomes. It also considers the definitions and measurements of budget/fiscal transparency indices used in the literature reviewed – thirty-seven papers published in English, online, during the 2000–2021 period. The reviewed papers mostly deal with budget transparency at the national (central) government level, probably due to the problems of measurement at subnational – state, provincial, regional, local – government levels. Tables 1 and 2 systematise the economic and political outcomes and their various measures found in the reviewed literature, and the possibility of using them in further research. Among economic variables, the most pronounced impact is on government budget balance, debt, and expenditures. Governments with higher budget transparency are associated with better budget balance, credit ratings, budget estimation and forecasting, as well as with higher expenditures and revenues, underestimation of revenues and expenditures, lower borrowing costs, government debt, and inflation. The highest proven political impact of budget transparency is on corruption. Governments with higher levels of budget transparency are perceived as less corrupt, i.e. having better control of corruption, as well as higher government quality, effectiveness, and spending efficiency. Moreover, they have more popular governors and higher public participation.","PeriodicalId":42223,"journal":{"name":"Croatian and Comparative Public Administration","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian and Comparative Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.22.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

his article focuses on a review of literature on the impacts of budget/fiscal transparency on economic and political outcomes. It also considers the definitions and measurements of budget/fiscal transparency indices used in the literature reviewed – thirty-seven papers published in English, online, during the 2000–2021 period. The reviewed papers mostly deal with budget transparency at the national (central) government level, probably due to the problems of measurement at subnational – state, provincial, regional, local – government levels. Tables 1 and 2 systematise the economic and political outcomes and their various measures found in the reviewed literature, and the possibility of using them in further research. Among economic variables, the most pronounced impact is on government budget balance, debt, and expenditures. Governments with higher budget transparency are associated with better budget balance, credit ratings, budget estimation and forecasting, as well as with higher expenditures and revenues, underestimation of revenues and expenditures, lower borrowing costs, government debt, and inflation. The highest proven political impact of budget transparency is on corruption. Governments with higher levels of budget transparency are perceived as less corrupt, i.e. having better control of corruption, as well as higher government quality, effectiveness, and spending efficiency. Moreover, they have more popular governors and higher public participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预算透明度对经济和政治结果的影响
他的文章重点回顾了预算/财政透明度对经济和政治结果影响的文献。它还考虑了所审查文献中使用的预算/财政透明度指数的定义和衡量标准——2000-2001年期间,以英语在线发表的37篇论文。被审查的文件主要涉及国家(中央)政府层面的预算透明度,这可能是由于国家以下各级——州、省、地区、地方政府层面的衡量问题。表1和表2系统化了审查文献中的经济和政治结果及其各种衡量标准,以及在进一步研究中使用这些结果的可能性。在经济变量中,对政府预算平衡、债务和支出的影响最为明显。预算透明度越高的政府,预算平衡、信用评级、预算估计和预测就越好,支出和收入也就越高,收入和支出被低估,借贷成本、政府债务和通货膨胀也就越低。事实证明,预算透明度对政治影响最大的是腐败。预算透明度较高的政府被认为腐败程度较低,即对腐败有更好的控制,政府质量、效率和支出效率也较高。此外,他们有更受欢迎的州长和更高的公众参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Integration of Effectiveness and Efficiency Indicators of State Support for Projects and Programmes for the Development of Higher Education in Russia Istraživanje korištenja usluga sustava e-Građani kod mladih – primjer grada Zadra Sudjelovanje u troškovima zdravstvene zaštite iz obveznog zdravstvenog osiguranja Preparation for Old Age and Ageing in the Time of the First Czechoslovak Republic Public and Private Law Aspects of Breach of the Concession Contract in Slovenian Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1