Parasitic universes: Organisational and technological meddling in the social

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 ERGONOMICS New Technology Work and Employment Pub Date : 2022-07-11 DOI:10.1111/ntwe.12253
S. Bailey, Marc Lenglet, Gemma Lord, Dean Pierides, D. Tischer
{"title":"Parasitic universes: Organisational and technological meddling in the social","authors":"S. Bailey, Marc Lenglet, Gemma Lord, Dean Pierides, D. Tischer","doi":"10.1111/ntwe.12253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debates about technology theorising ‘ the social ’ solely on dyadic and fixed positional terms fail to grasp important ways that new financial technologies participate in work organisations. As an alternative, we build on the work of Michel Serres to propose that these technologies already inhabit triadic and relational parasitic universes in which they introduce interruptions that do much more than mediate between degrees of technological and social determinism. To understand the forms of agency this affords, we analyse two contrasting studies of workplaces where financial technologies were introduced. In a UK non ‐ profit social care organisation, relations of care were fundamentally disrupted by disorderly, dysfunctional forms of agency, whereas in UK retail banking, management used disorder to strategically obscure their own agency. Technological innovation and ‘ future of work ’ narratives are shown to feed each other, in service to interests that benefit from the repurposing of technologies, people and organisations.","PeriodicalId":51550,"journal":{"name":"New Technology Work and Employment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Technology Work and Employment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Debates about technology theorising ‘ the social ’ solely on dyadic and fixed positional terms fail to grasp important ways that new financial technologies participate in work organisations. As an alternative, we build on the work of Michel Serres to propose that these technologies already inhabit triadic and relational parasitic universes in which they introduce interruptions that do much more than mediate between degrees of technological and social determinism. To understand the forms of agency this affords, we analyse two contrasting studies of workplaces where financial technologies were introduced. In a UK non ‐ profit social care organisation, relations of care were fundamentally disrupted by disorderly, dysfunctional forms of agency, whereas in UK retail banking, management used disorder to strategically obscure their own agency. Technological innovation and ‘ future of work ’ narratives are shown to feed each other, in service to interests that benefit from the repurposing of technologies, people and organisations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寄生宇宙:组织和技术对社会的干预
关于技术将“社会”理论化的争论仅仅基于二元和固定的位置术语,未能把握新金融技术参与工作组织的重要方式。作为替代方案,我们在Michel Serres的工作基础上提出,这些技术已经存在于三位一体和关系寄生的宇宙中,它们引入的中断不仅仅是在技术决定论和社会决定论的程度之间进行调解。为了理解这提供的代理形式,我们分析了引入金融技术的工作场所的两个对比研究。在英国一家非营利性社会关怀组织中,关爱关系被无序、功能失调的代理形式从根本上破坏了,而在英国零售银行,管理层利用无序从战略上模糊了他们自己的代理。技术创新和“未来工作”的叙述是相互促进的,服务于从技术、人员和组织的重新利用中受益的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
15.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: New Technology, Work and Employment presents analysis of the changing contours of technological and organisational systems and processes in order to encourage an enhanced and critical understanding of the dimensions of technological change in the workplace and in employment more generally. The journal is eclectic and invites contributions from across the social sciences, with the primary focus on critical and non-managerial approaches to the subject. It has the aim of publishing papers from perspectives concerned with the changing nature of new technology and workplace and employment relations. The objective of the journal is to promote deeper understanding through conceptual debate firmly rooted in analysis of current practices and sociotechnical change.
期刊最新文献
How to do HRM with numbers? A performative lens on HR metrics, HR analytics and HR algorithms Framing algorithmic management: Constructed antagonism on HR technology websites A tale of two platforms: Habitus as the structuring force of gig workers' experience How education professionals manage personal and professional boundaries when using social technologies ‘Everything now, all the time’: The connectivity paradox and gender equality in the legal profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1