Prediction of Stone Free Rate after Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy using Stone Nephrolithometry Score in Nobel Medical College Teaching hospital – A Prospective Study

Ram Sagar Shah, Niraj Thapa, Jit Prakash Shrestha, A. Koirala, Kartikesh Mishra, Raju Jayshwal, Sinet Pokharel, Himal Pandey
{"title":"Prediction of Stone Free Rate after Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy using Stone Nephrolithometry Score in Nobel Medical College Teaching hospital – A Prospective Study","authors":"Ram Sagar Shah, Niraj Thapa, Jit Prakash Shrestha, A. Koirala, Kartikesh Mishra, Raju Jayshwal, Sinet Pokharel, Himal Pandey","doi":"10.3126/jonmc.v12i1.56247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Amongst all the modalities of treatment for renal stones, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is preferred treatment for large volume renal stone disease. However, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with the risk of postoperative complications and the problem of stone free status. So, a preoperative classification is necessary to grade the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and STONE (stone size, tract length, degree of obstruction, number of involved calices, and stone essence) nephrolithometry score is one of such kind. \nMaterials and Methods: This is analytical study conducted at the Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal from January 2020 to July 2020. Total 115 patients were included in the study. These patients were subjected for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Stone clearance was documented at the end of the surgery; on first postoperative day and at 4 weeks. \nResults: In our study the stone – free rate was 89.6%. 32 patients experienced complications (27.8%). The STONE (stone size, tract length, degree of obstruction, number of involved calices, and stone essence) score correlated with the postoperative stone – free status (P=0.001). The patients rendered stone free had statistically significant lower scores than the patients with residual stones (6.83 ± 1.83 vs 9.83 ± 2.08, P = 0.001). \nConclusion: The STONE (stone size, tract length, degree of obstruction, number of involved calices, and stone essence) nephrolithometry score is a simple and easy tool to apply system for predicting complexity in stone clearance with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.","PeriodicalId":52824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nobel Medical College","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nobel Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jonmc.v12i1.56247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amongst all the modalities of treatment for renal stones, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is preferred treatment for large volume renal stone disease. However, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with the risk of postoperative complications and the problem of stone free status. So, a preoperative classification is necessary to grade the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and STONE (stone size, tract length, degree of obstruction, number of involved calices, and stone essence) nephrolithometry score is one of such kind. Materials and Methods: This is analytical study conducted at the Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal from January 2020 to July 2020. Total 115 patients were included in the study. These patients were subjected for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Stone clearance was documented at the end of the surgery; on first postoperative day and at 4 weeks. Results: In our study the stone – free rate was 89.6%. 32 patients experienced complications (27.8%). The STONE (stone size, tract length, degree of obstruction, number of involved calices, and stone essence) score correlated with the postoperative stone – free status (P=0.001). The patients rendered stone free had statistically significant lower scores than the patients with residual stones (6.83 ± 1.83 vs 9.83 ± 2.08, P = 0.001). Conclusion: The STONE (stone size, tract length, degree of obstruction, number of involved calices, and stone essence) nephrolithometry score is a simple and easy tool to apply system for predicting complexity in stone clearance with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诺贝尔医学院教学医院标准经皮肾穿刺取石术后结石游离率的前瞻性研究
背景:在所有治疗肾结石的方式中,经皮肾镜取石术是大体积肾结石疾病的首选治疗方法。然而,经皮肾镜取石术与术后并发症的风险和无结石状态的问题有关。因此,术前有必要对经皮肾镜取石术和结石的复杂性进行分级(结石大小、尿路长度、阻塞程度、受累肾盏数、结石实质),肾结石测量评分就是其中一种。材料和方法:这是一项分析性研究,于2020年1月至2020年7月在尼泊尔比拉特纳格尔诺贝尔医学院和教学医院泌尿外科和肾脏移植科进行。研究共纳入115例患者。这些患者接受经皮肾镜取石术。手术结束时记录结石清除情况;术后第一天和第4周。结果:本组结石清除率为89.6%。32例出现并发症(27.8%)。结石(结石大小、尿路长度、梗阻程度、受累肾盏数和结石实质)评分与术后无结石状态相关(P=0.001)。结石清除组得分低于结石残留组(6.83±1.83 vs 9.83±2.08,P = 0.001)。结论:结石(结石大小、尿路长度、梗阻程度、受累肾盏数、结石实质)肾结石测量评分是预测经皮肾镜取石术后结石清除复杂性的一种简单易行的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Professional Values among Undergraduate Nursing Students in Nobel Medical College Teaching Hospital Sex Differentiation from Fingerprint Ridge Density A Comparative Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Amlodipine and Enalapril when Prescribed as Monotherapy in Patients with Isolated Systolic Hypertension Outcome of Lung Functions in Covid-19 Patients at a Tertiary Care Center of Eastern Nepal Quality of Life among Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases at Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1