Safety Planning in Context: A Case Study Integrating DBT Techniques and ACT for Overlapping Suicide and Psychosis Risk

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Clinical Case Studies Pub Date : 2022-11-25 DOI:10.1177/15346501221139916
Christopher J. Ceccolini, Michelle S. Friedman-Yakoobian, S. Yen, M. West
{"title":"Safety Planning in Context: A Case Study Integrating DBT Techniques and ACT for Overlapping Suicide and Psychosis Risk","authors":"Christopher J. Ceccolini, Michelle S. Friedman-Yakoobian, S. Yen, M. West","doi":"10.1177/15346501221139916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Suicide risk is markedly higher for clients at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-p) compared to the general population. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has a strong evidence base supporting its utility for managing suicide risk. Meanwhile, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has been shown to effectively treat individuals with psychosis symptoms, as well as comorbid anxiety and mood disorders in CHR-p clients. Despite the robust evidence for each of these modalities in addressing concerns around suicidality and psychosis risk independently, there is a paucity of literature on how to support clients experiencing co-occurring suicide and psychosis risk. Such overlapping risk is often central to presenting concerns in CHR-p clients. Our manuscript presents a case example of an integrated DBT-ACT approach to managing risk surrounding both suicide and psychosis symptoms in an outpatient setting. We highlight how an integrated approach may help outpatient providers to implement and modify effective treatment that promotes continued outpatient care focused on goals beyond immediate risk management of both suicide and emerging psychosis. We provide specific examples of DBT techniques and ACT interventions used by a supervised doctoral-level student clinician in treatment with a CHR-p client and discuss implications for future clinical research.","PeriodicalId":46059,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Case Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"327 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15346501221139916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Suicide risk is markedly higher for clients at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-p) compared to the general population. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has a strong evidence base supporting its utility for managing suicide risk. Meanwhile, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has been shown to effectively treat individuals with psychosis symptoms, as well as comorbid anxiety and mood disorders in CHR-p clients. Despite the robust evidence for each of these modalities in addressing concerns around suicidality and psychosis risk independently, there is a paucity of literature on how to support clients experiencing co-occurring suicide and psychosis risk. Such overlapping risk is often central to presenting concerns in CHR-p clients. Our manuscript presents a case example of an integrated DBT-ACT approach to managing risk surrounding both suicide and psychosis symptoms in an outpatient setting. We highlight how an integrated approach may help outpatient providers to implement and modify effective treatment that promotes continued outpatient care focused on goals beyond immediate risk management of both suicide and emerging psychosis. We provide specific examples of DBT techniques and ACT interventions used by a supervised doctoral-level student clinician in treatment with a CHR-p client and discuss implications for future clinical research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景下的安全规划:整合DBT技术和ACT的自杀和精神病风险重叠案例研究
与一般人群相比,临床精神病高危患者(chrp)的自杀风险明显更高。辩证行为疗法(DBT)有强有力的证据支持其管理自杀风险的效用。同时,接受和承诺疗法(ACT)已被证明能有效治疗有精神病症状的个体,以及chrp患者的共病焦虑和情绪障碍。尽管有强有力的证据表明,每种治疗方式都能独立地解决自杀和精神病风险的问题,但关于如何支持同时发生自杀和精神病风险的客户的文献却很少。这种重叠的风险通常是chrp客户关注的核心问题。我们的手稿提出了一个综合DBT-ACT方法来管理门诊环境中自杀和精神病症状风险的案例。我们强调了综合方法如何帮助门诊提供者实施和修改有效的治疗,以促进持续的门诊护理,重点关注自杀和新发精神病的直接风险管理之外的目标。我们提供了一个博士级实习临床医生在治疗chrp客户时使用DBT技术和ACT干预的具体例子,并讨论了对未来临床研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Clinical Case Studies seeks manuscripts that articulate various theoretical frameworks. All manuscripts will require an abstract and must adhere to the following format: (1) Theoretical and Research Basis, (2) Case Introduction, (3) Presenting Complaints, (4) History, (5) Assessment, (6) Case Conceptualization (this is where the clinician"s thinking and treatment selection come to the forefront), (7) Course of Treatment and Assessment of Progress, (8) Complicating Factors (including medical management), (9) Managed Care Considerations (if any), (10) Follow-up (how and how long), (11) Treatment Implications of the Case, (12) Recommendations to Clinicians and Students, and References.
期刊最新文献
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and Self-Compassion for Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Comorbid Major Depressive Disorder: A Case Study Acceptance and Commitment Teletherapy for Mixed Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A case Study Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with Separated Parents of a 3-Year-Old Child with Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional Traits Anxiety Management in Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria within Integrated Primary Care Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing of Maleficium: Case Study of a “Cursed” Woman Suffering From Unexplained Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1