Introducing an ecologically-based pest management approach in Cambodia through adaptive learning networks

IF 3.5 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Outlook on Agriculture Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/00307270231177721
R. Flor, H. Maat, A. Stuart, Rathmuny Then, Saban Choun, Sokunroth Chhun, B. Hadi
{"title":"Introducing an ecologically-based pest management approach in Cambodia through adaptive learning networks","authors":"R. Flor, H. Maat, A. Stuart, Rathmuny Then, Saban Choun, Sokunroth Chhun, B. Hadi","doi":"10.1177/00307270231177721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can we reach farmers with ecologically-based Integrated Pest Management (IPM) while creating a supportive context for adoption by farmers and relevant stakeholders? We assessed a new method – Adaptive Learning Networks – from reflections of varied stakeholders, farmer diaries and survey data procured in 2016 and 2019. This method is different from current IPM approaches, in that an explicit focus of learning was on engaging other stakeholders to enable adoption by farmers. For example, access to IPM products, providing new services and creating new policies were intrinsically part of the learning process, alongside learning on-farm IPM techniques. The main consideration is to ease farmers from being locked into the practice of pesticide reliance. The method facilitated multi-stakeholder learning that led to an adaptation of the IPM tools and techniques in the case examined. The priority of this new method was socio-technical learning, wherein varied stakeholders modify interactions, incentives and arrangements relating to pest management. Comparing 2016 and 2019 data, there was a significant reduction in insecticide, herbicide, and rodenticide applications. The observed outcomes indicate the potential to enable a wider spread of IPM technologies.","PeriodicalId":54661,"journal":{"name":"Outlook on Agriculture","volume":"52 1","pages":"200 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Outlook on Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00307270231177721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How can we reach farmers with ecologically-based Integrated Pest Management (IPM) while creating a supportive context for adoption by farmers and relevant stakeholders? We assessed a new method – Adaptive Learning Networks – from reflections of varied stakeholders, farmer diaries and survey data procured in 2016 and 2019. This method is different from current IPM approaches, in that an explicit focus of learning was on engaging other stakeholders to enable adoption by farmers. For example, access to IPM products, providing new services and creating new policies were intrinsically part of the learning process, alongside learning on-farm IPM techniques. The main consideration is to ease farmers from being locked into the practice of pesticide reliance. The method facilitated multi-stakeholder learning that led to an adaptation of the IPM tools and techniques in the case examined. The priority of this new method was socio-technical learning, wherein varied stakeholders modify interactions, incentives and arrangements relating to pest management. Comparing 2016 and 2019 data, there was a significant reduction in insecticide, herbicide, and rodenticide applications. The observed outcomes indicate the potential to enable a wider spread of IPM technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过适应性学习网络在柬埔寨引入基于生态的有害生物管理方法
我们如何通过基于生态的综合虫害管理(IPM)为农民和相关利益相关者提供支持?我们根据不同利益相关者的反映、农民日记和2016年和2019年获得的调查数据,评估了一种新方法——自适应学习网络。这种方法与目前的IPM方法不同,因为明确的学习重点是让其他利益相关者参与进来,以使农民能够采用。例如,获得IPM产品、提供新服务和制定新政策,以及学习农场IPM技术,本质上都是学习过程的一部分。主要考虑因素是使农民免于陷入依赖农药的做法。该方法促进了多方利益攸关方的学习,从而对所审查的案例中的IPM工具和技术进行了调整。这种新方法的优先事项是社会技术学习,其中不同的利益相关者修改与害虫管理有关的互动、激励和安排。比较2016年和2019年的数据,杀虫剂、除草剂和灭鼠剂的应用显著减少。观察到的结果表明,IPM技术有可能得到更广泛的推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Outlook on Agriculture
Outlook on Agriculture 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Outlook on Agriculture is a peer reviewed journal, published quarterly, which welcomes original research papers, research notes, invited reviews and commentary for an international and interdisciplinary readership. Special attention is paid to agricultural policy, international trade in the agricultural sector, strategic developments in food production, the links between agricultural systems and food security, the role of agriculture in social and economic development, agriculture in developing countries and environmental issues, including natural resources for agriculture and climate impacts.
期刊最新文献
Intellectual property rights and plants made by new genomic techniques: Access to technology and gene-edited traits in plant breeding Motivation and opportunity may drive Tunisian farmers to reduce chemical pesticides in horticulture Deciphering the crux of women's empowerment in agricultural value chains – A scoping review Gendered impacts of COVID-19 in agri-food system and recovery pathways in India: A systematic review Opinion leaders’ influence on knowledge transmission about crop diseases management: Exploring the attributes that matter to followers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1