Beating the school discipline odds: conceptualizing and examining inclusive disciplinary schools in New York City

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Effectiveness and School Improvement Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/09243453.2023.2182795
Richard O. Welsh, Luis A. Rodriguez, Blaise B. Joseph
{"title":"Beating the school discipline odds: conceptualizing and examining inclusive disciplinary schools in New York City","authors":"Richard O. Welsh, Luis A. Rodriguez, Blaise B. Joseph","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2023.2182795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Racial inequality in school discipline is a salient challenge in the United States. Using New York City as a case, this study examines inclusive disciplinary schools (IDS) or schools that have “beat the school discipline odds”. IDS, median disciplinary schools (MDS), and high disciplinary schools (HDS) have vastly different exclusionary discipline rates for Black and Latinx students (both suspensions and office discipline referrals). The schooling environments of IDS differ from those of HDS and MDS. IDS have greater teacher and school leader diversity, more experienced teachers and school administrators, and a more positive school climate than HDS. Poverty and unemployment rates, crime rates, education levels, and the proportion of Black and foreign-born residents vary significantly across the neighborhoods of IDS, MDS, and HDS. These results remain largely consistent across limiting IDS to predominantly Black schools, predominantly Latinx schools, or predominantly low-income schools. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":"34 1","pages":"271 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2182795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Racial inequality in school discipline is a salient challenge in the United States. Using New York City as a case, this study examines inclusive disciplinary schools (IDS) or schools that have “beat the school discipline odds”. IDS, median disciplinary schools (MDS), and high disciplinary schools (HDS) have vastly different exclusionary discipline rates for Black and Latinx students (both suspensions and office discipline referrals). The schooling environments of IDS differ from those of HDS and MDS. IDS have greater teacher and school leader diversity, more experienced teachers and school administrators, and a more positive school climate than HDS. Poverty and unemployment rates, crime rates, education levels, and the proportion of Black and foreign-born residents vary significantly across the neighborhoods of IDS, MDS, and HDS. These results remain largely consistent across limiting IDS to predominantly Black schools, predominantly Latinx schools, or predominantly low-income schools. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
击败学校纪律的可能性:概念化和检查纽约市的包容性纪律学校
学校纪律中的种族不平等是美国面临的一个突出挑战。本研究以纽约市为例,考察了包容性纪律学校(IDS)或“优于学校纪律赔率”的学校。IDS,中等纪律学校(MDS)和高纪律学校(HDS)对黑人和拉丁裔学生的排他纪律率有很大不同(包括停学和办公室纪律转介)。IDS的学习环境不同于HDS和MDS。IDS比HDS有更大的教师和学校领导多样性,更有经验的教师和学校管理人员,以及更积极的学校氛围。贫困和失业率、犯罪率、教育水平以及黑人和外国出生居民的比例在IDS、MDS和HDS社区之间差别很大。这些结果在将IDS限制在主要是黑人学校,主要是拉丁裔学校或主要是低收入学校的情况下基本保持一致。讨论了今后研究的意义和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
School Effectiveness and School Improvement EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: School Effectiveness and School Improvement presents information on educational effectiveness, practice and policy-making across primary, secondary and higher education. The Editors believe that the educational progress of all students, regardless of family background and economic status, is the key indicator of effectiveness and improvement in schools. The journal strives to explore this idea with manuscripts that cover a range of subjects within the area of educational effectiveness at the classroom, school or system level, including, but not limited to: •Effective pedagogy •Classroom climate •School ethos and leadership •School improvement and reform programmes •Systemwide policy and reform
期刊最新文献
Advancing the field of educational effectiveness and equity School leadership and students’ decisions about further education: exploring the roles of goal setting and school socioeconomic composition Against the odds: predictors of academic success and excellence in majority-minority schools Effects of the comprehensive school reform program Success for All on students’ reading skills in Dutch schools High-quality teachers in low-quality schools: understanding the variation in teaching quality in low-achieving Chilean schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1