Comparing the Learning Outcomes of Online versus Face-to-Face Formats in Teaching a Marketing Course: An Empirical Observation

Sang T. Choe
{"title":"Comparing the Learning Outcomes of Online versus Face-to-Face Formats in Teaching a Marketing Course: An Empirical Observation","authors":"Sang T. Choe","doi":"10.14738/abr.118.15317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was conducted to compare the academic performance of two groups of university students enrolled in the Principles of Marketing course. One group of students participated in an online class, while the other group of students attended a face-to-face class. The results of the study revealed notable differences in academic performance between the two groups. The findings consistently indicated that the online students outperformed their counterparts in the face-to-face class, particularly, in the multiple-choice examinations as well as the essay-problem questions. However, the author of the study highlights a significant factor that readers should consider when interpreting these results. The higher performance demonstrated by online students may be attributed to their demographic and socioeconomic background. It was observed that the online students were significantly older, married, and came from a higher economic status compared to the face-to-face class students. Furthermore, the online students devoted nearly double the amount of time to studying, averaging 6.26 hours per week compared to 3.54 hours for the face-to-face class students in the study.","PeriodicalId":72277,"journal":{"name":"Archives of business research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of business research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.118.15317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study was conducted to compare the academic performance of two groups of university students enrolled in the Principles of Marketing course. One group of students participated in an online class, while the other group of students attended a face-to-face class. The results of the study revealed notable differences in academic performance between the two groups. The findings consistently indicated that the online students outperformed their counterparts in the face-to-face class, particularly, in the multiple-choice examinations as well as the essay-problem questions. However, the author of the study highlights a significant factor that readers should consider when interpreting these results. The higher performance demonstrated by online students may be attributed to their demographic and socioeconomic background. It was observed that the online students were significantly older, married, and came from a higher economic status compared to the face-to-face class students. Furthermore, the online students devoted nearly double the amount of time to studying, averaging 6.26 hours per week compared to 3.54 hours for the face-to-face class students in the study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场营销课程在线教学与面对面教学的学习效果比较:一项实证观察
本研究比较了两组参加市场营销原理课程的大学生的学习成绩。一组学生参加在线课程,而另一组学生参加面对面的课程。研究结果显示,两组学生在学习成绩上存在显著差异。研究结果一致表明,在线学生的表现优于面对面课堂的学生,特别是在多项选择题和论文问题上。然而,该研究的作者强调了读者在解释这些结果时应该考虑的一个重要因素。在线学生表现出的更高表现可能归因于他们的人口和社会经济背景。据观察,与面对面的学生相比,在线学生明显年龄较大,已婚,经济地位较高。此外,在线学生花在学习上的时间几乎是在线学生的两倍,平均每周6.26小时,而面对面课堂的学生平均每周3.54小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health and Safety Training to Include Disaster Response: Building Better Resiliency Through Union Leadership. Unlocking Retail Success: Empowering Decision-Making with Advanced Sales Forecast Models Trends in The Study of Administration Professional Agent Perspectives on Representing WNBA Athletes in the United States A Comparison of Three Asian English Textbooks by Correspondence Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1