Making our plant modelling community more than the sum of its parts: a personal perspective

IF 2.6 Q1 AGRONOMY in silico Plants Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1093/INSILICOPLANTS/DIY002
S. Long
{"title":"Making our plant modelling community more than the sum of its parts: a personal perspective","authors":"S. Long","doi":"10.1093/INSILICOPLANTS/DIY002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of mathematical modelling represents a transition in any scientific area towards quantitative and unequivocal presentation of hypotheses and theory. In Physics, phenomena are now predicted from mathematical models and computer simulations of those models well before observations are made to confirm these predictions. Indeed the largest endeavours in Physics, such as particle physics accelerators and astrophysics observational platforms, are created to test the most profound predictions of such models. Given the huge complexity of living organisms coupled with massive species and even phenotype within genotype diversity, we are far from the same level of advancement, yet need to approach it. Complexity of our systems means that many biological modelling efforts will remain, largely, based on emergent properties and phenomena. Nevertheless, complete models of the full complexity of single-celled organisms are beginning to transition to eukaryotes (Beard et al. 2012; Service 2016). Within narrow areas of gene function, we are already seeing successful projections from gene expression to prediction of growth and development of whole plants (Chew et al. 2014). Modelling provides a framework in which we can precisely organize and test our quantitative knowledge and hypotheses about how a plant process or combination of processes works and then test these against reality. As such, it provides a data-hypothesis-test-learn cycle to improve our understanding of plants and their use. Equally, the rapid growth of high-throughput ‘omics facilities is delivering ever-increasing amounts of data for which our capacity and ability to analyse and interpret lags. Mathematical models coupled with high-performance computing provide a means to deliver this needed acceleration. Simultaneously it should provide the means to predict which data is needed most, so providing feedback and focus for ‘omics approaches. This wealth of data also provides unprecedented opportunities for improving the precision of models by high-speed data to model linkage. Similarly, numerical and text mining knowledge discovery offer much to improving mathematical modelling of plant processes, with opportunities for automated improvement of representation and parameterization (Fer et al. 2018). In parallel, computer simulation of mathematical models has evolved from printouts of numbers to 3D representations of the growth and development of organs, whole plants and even communities of plants that can be indistinguishable from the real thing (Fig. 1). This facilitates identification of emergent phenomena while providing unprecedented opportunities in revolutionizing plant science education (Prusinkiewicz et al. 2007; Prusinkiewicz and Runions 2012; Runions et al. 2017).","PeriodicalId":36138,"journal":{"name":"in silico Plants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/INSILICOPLANTS/DIY002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"in silico Plants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/INSILICOPLANTS/DIY002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The rise of mathematical modelling represents a transition in any scientific area towards quantitative and unequivocal presentation of hypotheses and theory. In Physics, phenomena are now predicted from mathematical models and computer simulations of those models well before observations are made to confirm these predictions. Indeed the largest endeavours in Physics, such as particle physics accelerators and astrophysics observational platforms, are created to test the most profound predictions of such models. Given the huge complexity of living organisms coupled with massive species and even phenotype within genotype diversity, we are far from the same level of advancement, yet need to approach it. Complexity of our systems means that many biological modelling efforts will remain, largely, based on emergent properties and phenomena. Nevertheless, complete models of the full complexity of single-celled organisms are beginning to transition to eukaryotes (Beard et al. 2012; Service 2016). Within narrow areas of gene function, we are already seeing successful projections from gene expression to prediction of growth and development of whole plants (Chew et al. 2014). Modelling provides a framework in which we can precisely organize and test our quantitative knowledge and hypotheses about how a plant process or combination of processes works and then test these against reality. As such, it provides a data-hypothesis-test-learn cycle to improve our understanding of plants and their use. Equally, the rapid growth of high-throughput ‘omics facilities is delivering ever-increasing amounts of data for which our capacity and ability to analyse and interpret lags. Mathematical models coupled with high-performance computing provide a means to deliver this needed acceleration. Simultaneously it should provide the means to predict which data is needed most, so providing feedback and focus for ‘omics approaches. This wealth of data also provides unprecedented opportunities for improving the precision of models by high-speed data to model linkage. Similarly, numerical and text mining knowledge discovery offer much to improving mathematical modelling of plant processes, with opportunities for automated improvement of representation and parameterization (Fer et al. 2018). In parallel, computer simulation of mathematical models has evolved from printouts of numbers to 3D representations of the growth and development of organs, whole plants and even communities of plants that can be indistinguishable from the real thing (Fig. 1). This facilitates identification of emergent phenomena while providing unprecedented opportunities in revolutionizing plant science education (Prusinkiewicz et al. 2007; Prusinkiewicz and Runions 2012; Runions et al. 2017).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使我们的植物建模社区不仅仅是各部分的总和:个人视角
数学建模的兴起代表着任何科学领域向定量和明确地提出假设和理论的转变。在物理学中,在进行观测以证实这些预测之前,就已经通过数学模型和这些模型的计算机模拟来预测现象了。事实上,物理学中最大的努力,如粒子物理加速器和天体物理学观测平台,都是为了测试这些模型最深刻的预测。考虑到活生物体的巨大复杂性,加上基因型多样性中的大量物种甚至表型,我们还远远没有达到同样的进步水平,但需要接近它。我们系统的复杂性意味着,许多生物建模工作将在很大程度上仍然基于新出现的特性和现象。然而,单细胞生物完全复杂性的完整模型正开始向真核生物过渡(Beard等人,2012;Service 2016)。在基因功能的狭窄领域内,我们已经看到了从基因表达到整个植物生长发育预测的成功预测(Chew等人,2014)。建模提供了一个框架,在这个框架中,我们可以精确地组织和测试我们关于植物过程或过程组合如何工作的定量知识和假设,然后对照现实进行测试。因此,它提供了一个数据假设检验学习周期,以提高我们对植物及其使用的理解。同样,高通量组学设施的快速增长正在提供越来越多的数据,而我们分析和解释这些数据的能力和能力滞后。数学模型与高性能计算相结合,提供了一种提供所需加速度的方法。同时,它应该提供预测最需要哪些数据的方法,从而为“组学方法”提供反馈和关注。这种丰富的数据也为通过高速数据到模型的链接来提高模型的精度提供了前所未有的机会。同样,数值和文本挖掘知识发现为改进工厂过程的数学建模提供了很大的帮助,并为自动化改进表示和参数化提供了机会(Fer等人,2018)。与此同时,数学模型的计算机模拟已经从数字的打印输出发展到器官、整个植物甚至植物群落的生长和发育的3D表示,这些都与真实事物无法区分(图1)。这有助于识别新兴现象,同时为植物科学教育的革命性发展提供了前所未有的机会(Prusinkiewicz等人,2007;Prusinkievicz和Runions 2012;Runions等人2017)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
in silico Plants
in silico Plants Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changes in the leaf area-seed yield relationship in soybean driven by genetic, management and environments: Implications for High-Throughput Phenotyping A Multi-Tissue Genome-Scale Model of Populus trichocarpa Elucidates Overexpression Targets for Improving Drought Tolerance Modelling the architecture of hazelnut (Corylus avellana) Tonda di Giffoni over two successive years An evaluation of Goudriaan's summary model for light interception in strip canopies, using functional-structural plant models Playing a crop simulation model using symbols and sounds: the ‘mandala’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1