{"title":"Another turn of the screw on the history of the reaction object construction","authors":"Tamara Bouso, Pablo Ruano San Segundo","doi":"10.1075/FOL.20026.BOU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article deals with the Reaction Object Construction (ROC), as in She smiled disbelief, where\n an intransitive verb (smile), by adding an emotional object (disbelief), acquires the extended\n sense “express X by V−ing” (i.e. “She expressed disbelief by smiling”). Earlier research has suggested a diachronic connection\n between the ROC and Direct Discourse Constructions (DDCs) of the type She smiled, “I don’t believe you” (Visser 1963–1973). More recently, Bouso (2018)\n has shown that the ROC is primarily a feature of 19th century narrative fiction. This paper aims to bring together these insights.\n On the basis of a self-compiled corpus and De Smet’s Corpus of English Novels, it investigates the productivity\n of the ROC in 19th and 20th century fiction, and the role of DDCs in its development. The results reveal a peak in the\n productivity of the ROC that coincides with the development of the sentimental novel, and a correlation between the development of\n the ROC on the one hand and of those DDCs that have been mistakenly hypothesised to be its single source constructions on the\n other. Extravagance is proposed as a triggering factor for the use of the ROC in the 19th century as an alternative to DDCs.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/FOL.20026.BOU","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This article deals with the Reaction Object Construction (ROC), as in She smiled disbelief, where
an intransitive verb (smile), by adding an emotional object (disbelief), acquires the extended
sense “express X by V−ing” (i.e. “She expressed disbelief by smiling”). Earlier research has suggested a diachronic connection
between the ROC and Direct Discourse Constructions (DDCs) of the type She smiled, “I don’t believe you” (Visser 1963–1973). More recently, Bouso (2018)
has shown that the ROC is primarily a feature of 19th century narrative fiction. This paper aims to bring together these insights.
On the basis of a self-compiled corpus and De Smet’s Corpus of English Novels, it investigates the productivity
of the ROC in 19th and 20th century fiction, and the role of DDCs in its development. The results reveal a peak in the
productivity of the ROC that coincides with the development of the sentimental novel, and a correlation between the development of
the ROC on the one hand and of those DDCs that have been mistakenly hypothesised to be its single source constructions on the
other. Extravagance is proposed as a triggering factor for the use of the ROC in the 19th century as an alternative to DDCs.
期刊介绍:
Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.