{"title":"Continuity in discourse relations","authors":"Debopam Das, Markus Egg","doi":"10.1075/fol.22017.das","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Continuity and discontinuity (maintaining or shifting deictic centres across segments) are important aspects of\n discourse relations. Yet they have been attributed to these relations in very different ways. This calls for an analysis of\n individual instances of discourse relations with respect to their continuity dimensions. To this end, we operationalise Givón’s (1993) continuity dimensions (time, space, reference, action,\n perspective, modality, and speech act), decomposing them into distinctive features that allow a\n consistent and accurate classification of the continuity dimensions in discourse relation tokens. This inventory was applied to\n five representative relation types (causal, contrastive, conditional, elaboration, and\n temporal) from the RST Discourse Treebank (Carlson & Marcu 2001). We\n found that relations can simultaneously be more continuous for some dimensions but more discontinuous for others. What is more,\n discourse relations typically vary widely in different continuity dimensions and thus cannot be described as fully continuous or\n discontinuous, neither on the level of the entire relation type nor for one of its particular dimensions. Using examples of\n causal, conditional, and contrastive relations, we also illustrate how the results of our analysis\n can be used to verify hypotheses about correlations between continuity and discourse relations.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22017.das","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Continuity and discontinuity (maintaining or shifting deictic centres across segments) are important aspects of
discourse relations. Yet they have been attributed to these relations in very different ways. This calls for an analysis of
individual instances of discourse relations with respect to their continuity dimensions. To this end, we operationalise Givón’s (1993) continuity dimensions (time, space, reference, action,
perspective, modality, and speech act), decomposing them into distinctive features that allow a
consistent and accurate classification of the continuity dimensions in discourse relation tokens. This inventory was applied to
five representative relation types (causal, contrastive, conditional, elaboration, and
temporal) from the RST Discourse Treebank (Carlson & Marcu 2001). We
found that relations can simultaneously be more continuous for some dimensions but more discontinuous for others. What is more,
discourse relations typically vary widely in different continuity dimensions and thus cannot be described as fully continuous or
discontinuous, neither on the level of the entire relation type nor for one of its particular dimensions. Using examples of
causal, conditional, and contrastive relations, we also illustrate how the results of our analysis
can be used to verify hypotheses about correlations between continuity and discourse relations.
连续性和非连续性(在语段之间保持或转移指示中心)是语篇关系的重要方面。然而,人们以非常不同的方式将它们归因于这些关系。这就要求对话语关系的个别实例进行分析,考虑到它们的连续性维度。为此,我们运用Givón(1993)的连续性维度(时间、空间、参考、行动、视角、情态和言语行为),将它们分解成不同的特征,从而对话语关系标记中的连续性维度进行一致和准确的分类。该清单应用于RST话语树库中的五种代表性关系类型(因果关系、对比关系、条件关系、阐述关系和时间关系)(Carlson & Marcu 2001)。我们发现关系可以同时在某些维度上更连续,而在其他维度上更不连续。更重要的是,话语关系在不同的连续性维度上通常变化很大,因此无论是在整个关系类型的层面上,还是在其特定维度上,都不能被描述为完全连续或不连续。通过使用因果关系、条件关系和对比关系的例子,我们还说明了如何使用我们的分析结果来验证关于连续性和话语关系之间相关性的假设。
期刊介绍:
Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.