Continuity in discourse relations

IF 0.6 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Functions of Language Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1075/fol.22017.das
Debopam Das, Markus Egg
{"title":"Continuity in discourse relations","authors":"Debopam Das, Markus Egg","doi":"10.1075/fol.22017.das","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Continuity and discontinuity (maintaining or shifting deictic centres across segments) are important aspects of\n discourse relations. Yet they have been attributed to these relations in very different ways. This calls for an analysis of\n individual instances of discourse relations with respect to their continuity dimensions. To this end, we operationalise Givón’s (1993) continuity dimensions (time, space, reference, action,\n perspective, modality, and speech act), decomposing them into distinctive features that allow a\n consistent and accurate classification of the continuity dimensions in discourse relation tokens. This inventory was applied to\n five representative relation types (causal, contrastive, conditional, elaboration, and\n temporal) from the RST Discourse Treebank (Carlson & Marcu 2001). We\n found that relations can simultaneously be more continuous for some dimensions but more discontinuous for others. What is more,\n discourse relations typically vary widely in different continuity dimensions and thus cannot be described as fully continuous or\n discontinuous, neither on the level of the entire relation type nor for one of its particular dimensions. Using examples of\n causal, conditional, and contrastive relations, we also illustrate how the results of our analysis\n can be used to verify hypotheses about correlations between continuity and discourse relations.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22017.das","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Continuity and discontinuity (maintaining or shifting deictic centres across segments) are important aspects of discourse relations. Yet they have been attributed to these relations in very different ways. This calls for an analysis of individual instances of discourse relations with respect to their continuity dimensions. To this end, we operationalise Givón’s (1993) continuity dimensions (time, space, reference, action, perspective, modality, and speech act), decomposing them into distinctive features that allow a consistent and accurate classification of the continuity dimensions in discourse relation tokens. This inventory was applied to five representative relation types (causal, contrastive, conditional, elaboration, and temporal) from the RST Discourse Treebank (Carlson & Marcu 2001). We found that relations can simultaneously be more continuous for some dimensions but more discontinuous for others. What is more, discourse relations typically vary widely in different continuity dimensions and thus cannot be described as fully continuous or discontinuous, neither on the level of the entire relation type nor for one of its particular dimensions. Using examples of causal, conditional, and contrastive relations, we also illustrate how the results of our analysis can be used to verify hypotheses about correlations between continuity and discourse relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
话语关系的连续性
连续性和非连续性(在语段之间保持或转移指示中心)是语篇关系的重要方面。然而,人们以非常不同的方式将它们归因于这些关系。这就要求对话语关系的个别实例进行分析,考虑到它们的连续性维度。为此,我们运用Givón(1993)的连续性维度(时间、空间、参考、行动、视角、情态和言语行为),将它们分解成不同的特征,从而对话语关系标记中的连续性维度进行一致和准确的分类。该清单应用于RST话语树库中的五种代表性关系类型(因果关系、对比关系、条件关系、阐述关系和时间关系)(Carlson & Marcu 2001)。我们发现关系可以同时在某些维度上更连续,而在其他维度上更不连续。更重要的是,话语关系在不同的连续性维度上通常变化很大,因此无论是在整个关系类型的层面上,还是在其特定维度上,都不能被描述为完全连续或不连续。通过使用因果关系、条件关系和对比关系的例子,我们还说明了如何使用我们的分析结果来验证关于连续性和话语关系之间相关性的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.
期刊最新文献
The functions of evidentiality Review of Yus (2023): Pragmatics of internet humour Definite-like meaning of bare classifiers in Nung Cardinal direction judgment based on the integration of spatial reference frames in different languages Review of Kim, Martin, Shin & Choi (2023): Korean grammar: A systemic functional approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1