Danger, keep out! Trade union rights of entry during the COVID-19 pandemic

Katherine McFarlane
{"title":"Danger, keep out! Trade union rights of entry during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Katherine McFarlane","doi":"10.1080/10301763.2022.2111988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The closures and restrictions imposed at workplaces around Australia in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have raised unprecedented issues for trade unions seeking to exercise rights of entry in accordance with Part 3–4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Section 491 requires that union officials seeking to exercise a statutory right of entry comply with any ‘reasonable request’ by an occupier about an occupational health and safety (OHS) requirement that applies to the premises. This had led to disputes about the appropriateness of requirements imposed by employers to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infection and transmission. This paper will discuss three recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) decisions which consider the reasonableness of requests limiting entry to premises in this context. Although the cases had different outcomes, the FWC’s findings demonstrate how an employer’s OHS obligations relating to COVID-19 will be weighed against the objects of Part 3–4. Overall the FWC has taken a practical and nuanced approach to such disputes, and expected some cooperation between employers and unions. The limited scope of these decisions does, however, leave some questions relating to rights of entry during the pandemic unanswered.","PeriodicalId":45265,"journal":{"name":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour & Industry-A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2022.2111988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The closures and restrictions imposed at workplaces around Australia in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have raised unprecedented issues for trade unions seeking to exercise rights of entry in accordance with Part 3–4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Section 491 requires that union officials seeking to exercise a statutory right of entry comply with any ‘reasonable request’ by an occupier about an occupational health and safety (OHS) requirement that applies to the premises. This had led to disputes about the appropriateness of requirements imposed by employers to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infection and transmission. This paper will discuss three recent Fair Work Commission (FWC) decisions which consider the reasonableness of requests limiting entry to premises in this context. Although the cases had different outcomes, the FWC’s findings demonstrate how an employer’s OHS obligations relating to COVID-19 will be weighed against the objects of Part 3–4. Overall the FWC has taken a practical and nuanced approach to such disputes, and expected some cooperation between employers and unions. The limited scope of these decisions does, however, leave some questions relating to rights of entry during the pandemic unanswered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危险,不要靠近!2019冠状病毒病大流行期间工会的入境权
为应对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,澳大利亚各地对工作场所实施的关闭和限制,给工会根据《2009年公平工作法》(Cth)第3-4部分行使进入权提出了前所未有的问题。第491条要求寻求行使法定进入权的工会官员遵守占领者关于适用于房地的职业健康和安全(OHS)要求的任何"合理要求"。这导致了关于雇主为减轻COVID-19感染和传播风险而提出的要求是否适当的争议。本文将讨论公平工作委员会(FWC)最近的三个决定,这些决定考虑了在这种情况下限制进入房屋的请求的合理性。尽管这些案例有不同的结果,但FWC的调查结果表明,雇主与COVID-19有关的职业健康安全义务将如何与第3-4部分的目标进行权衡。总的来说,FWC对这类纠纷采取了一种实际而细致的方法,并期望雇主和工会之间进行一些合作。然而,由于这些决定的范围有限,在大流行期间与入境权有关的一些问题仍未得到解答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Livelihoods, work, women and climate change: women’s voice in just transition India’s informal economy: contractual labour in the formal manufacturing sector Industrial relations as power, place and time: the case of Queensland coal mining The value of work for doctors in Pakistan: towards a framework for ensuring decent work Teacher workload and the organisation of work: a research agenda for a post-pandemic future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1