La Ucrania post-soviética a la luz de la geopolítica crítica

Juan David Otálora Sechague
{"title":"La Ucrania post-soviética a la luz de la geopolítica crítica","authors":"Juan David Otálora Sechague","doi":"10.5354/0719-3769.2019.54278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLos acontecimientos politicos ocurridos en Ucrania que desataron una guerra civil en el oriente del pais y que trajeron como una de las consecuencias mas visibles la separacion de la peninsula de Crimea y su posterior anexion a la Federacion Rusa, puede analizarse desde la division interna de la elite y la poblacion ucraniana durante la post Guerra Fria. Este hecho se explica, desde la geopolitica critica, por la interpretacion divergente del espacio que suscito una doble fragmentacion: territorial (oriente/occidente) y de bloques (elite politica/ciudadania), que ha imposibilitado el surgimiento de una organizacion solida e independiente. El resultado de esta doble tension es la eclosion de lo que se denominara un “Estado bipolar”, que es justamente la caracteristica esencial de Ucrania en la era post-sovietica. EnglishThe political events in Ukraine that sparked a civil war in the east of the country and brought as one of the most visible consequences of the separation of the Crimea and its subsequent annexation to the Russian Federation, can be analyzed from the internal division of the elite and the Ukrainian population during the Cold War. This fact explains, from the critical geopolitics, by the divergent interpretation of space that aroused a double fragmentation: territorial (east/west) and blocks (political elite/citizenship), which has prevented the emergence of a strong and independent organization. The result of this double tension is the emergence of what is called a “bipolar state”, which is precisely the essential characteristic of Ukraine in the post-Soviet era.","PeriodicalId":30847,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Internacionales","volume":"51 1","pages":"131-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Internacionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-3769.2019.54278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

espanolLos acontecimientos politicos ocurridos en Ucrania que desataron una guerra civil en el oriente del pais y que trajeron como una de las consecuencias mas visibles la separacion de la peninsula de Crimea y su posterior anexion a la Federacion Rusa, puede analizarse desde la division interna de la elite y la poblacion ucraniana durante la post Guerra Fria. Este hecho se explica, desde la geopolitica critica, por la interpretacion divergente del espacio que suscito una doble fragmentacion: territorial (oriente/occidente) y de bloques (elite politica/ciudadania), que ha imposibilitado el surgimiento de una organizacion solida e independiente. El resultado de esta doble tension es la eclosion de lo que se denominara un “Estado bipolar”, que es justamente la caracteristica esencial de Ucrania en la era post-sovietica. EnglishThe political events in Ukraine that sparked a civil war in the east of the country and brought as one of the most visible consequences of the separation of the Crimea and its subsequent annexation to the Russian Federation, can be analyzed from the internal division of the elite and the Ukrainian population during the Cold War. This fact explains, from the critical geopolitics, by the divergent interpretation of space that aroused a double fragmentation: territorial (east/west) and blocks (political elite/citizenship), which has prevented the emergence of a strong and independent organization. The result of this double tension is the emergence of what is called a “bipolar state”, which is precisely the essential characteristic of Ukraine in the post-Soviet era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地缘政治批评视野中的后苏联乌克兰
西班牙在乌克兰发生的政治事件在该国东部引发了内战,并将克里米亚半岛的分离及其随后并入俄罗斯联邦作为最明显的后果之一,可以从冷战后乌克兰精英和人民的内部分裂中分析。地缘政治批评对空间的不同解释解释解释了这一事实,这导致了双重分裂:领土(东/西)和集团(政治精英/公民),这使一个团结和独立的组织无法出现。这种双重紧张的结果是所谓的“两极国家”的诞生,这正是乌克兰在后苏联时代的基本特征。在乌克兰,引发该国东部内战并被认为是克里米亚分离及其随后加入俄罗斯联邦的最明显后果之一的政治事件,可以从冷战期间精英和乌克兰人口的内部分裂中进行分析。这一事实从关键的地缘政治学角度解释了对空间的不同解释,这导致了双重分裂:领土(东/西)和街区(政治精英/公民),这阻止了一个强大和独立组织的出现。这种双重紧张局势的结果是出现了所谓的“两极国家”,这正是乌克兰在后苏联时代的本质特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
building of Brazilian Party System Guerra Fría, Reforma Agraria y patrimonio agroalimentario: la Empresa Pisquera del Estado (Chile, 1970-1973) inner circle of presidents Confiança na polícia e atitudes políticas autoritárias na América Latina Sustainability in Latin America and the Caribbean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1