Exploration–Exploitation Duality with Both Tradeoff and Synergy: The Curvilinear Interaction Effects of Learning Modes on Innovation Types

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Management and Organization Review Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1017/mor.2022.49
P. Li, Heng Liu, Yuan Li, Haifeng Wang
{"title":"Exploration–Exploitation Duality with Both Tradeoff and Synergy: The Curvilinear Interaction Effects of Learning Modes on Innovation Types","authors":"P. Li, Heng Liu, Yuan Li, Haifeng Wang","doi":"10.1017/mor.2022.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How can a firm apply the appropriate interaction between exploration and exploitation with the goal of either radical or incremental innovation? In this study, we seek to answer this puzzling question by reframing exploitation and exploration as a duality of learning (i.e., two modes that are partial complementary for synergy as well as partial conflicting for tradeoff). Specifically, rather than assuming either a positive or negative interaction between exploration and exploitation as prior literature has done, our study highlights a novel pattern of inverted U-shaped interaction between exploration and exploitation for both radical and incremental innovations. With a Chinese sample of 508 firms, our empirical evidence supports our prediction of two patterns of inverted U-shaped interaction of exploration and exploitation. Such unique findings showcase the unique value of reframing paradox into duality from the meta-perspective of yin-yang balancing to shed new light on organizational ambidexterity and innovation management.","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2022.49","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT How can a firm apply the appropriate interaction between exploration and exploitation with the goal of either radical or incremental innovation? In this study, we seek to answer this puzzling question by reframing exploitation and exploration as a duality of learning (i.e., two modes that are partial complementary for synergy as well as partial conflicting for tradeoff). Specifically, rather than assuming either a positive or negative interaction between exploration and exploitation as prior literature has done, our study highlights a novel pattern of inverted U-shaped interaction between exploration and exploitation for both radical and incremental innovations. With a Chinese sample of 508 firms, our empirical evidence supports our prediction of two patterns of inverted U-shaped interaction of exploration and exploitation. Such unique findings showcase the unique value of reframing paradox into duality from the meta-perspective of yin-yang balancing to shed new light on organizational ambidexterity and innovation management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权衡与协同的探索-开发二元性:学习模式对创新类型的曲线互动效应
企业如何将探索和开发之间的适当互动应用于激进创新或渐进式创新的目标?在本研究中,我们试图通过将开发和探索重新定义为学习的二元性来回答这个令人困惑的问题(即,两种模式在协同作用中部分互补,在权衡中部分冲突)。具体来说,我们的研究并没有像之前的文献那样假设勘探和开发之间存在积极或消极的相互作用,而是强调了激进创新和渐进式创新的勘探和开发之间存在一种倒u型相互作用的新模式。以中国508家企业为样本,我们的实证证据支持了我们对勘探和开发两种倒u型互动模式的预测。这些独特的发现显示了从阴阳平衡的元视角将悖论重新构建为二元性的独特价值,为组织双重性和创新管理提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Responsible Research: Reflections of Two Business Scholars Doing Mental Health Research During COVID-19 Follow the Giver: Is Chinese MNEs’ Investment in Africa Linked to Official Aid? Local Gambling Culture and Enterprise Bribery: A Social Norms Theory Perspective Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency Multiple Large Shareholders, Identity, and Corporate Tax Avoidance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1