Ethics in Masaryk’s classification of the sciences

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1515/humaff-2022-0028
Jan Svoboda
{"title":"Ethics in Masaryk’s classification of the sciences","authors":"Jan Svoboda","doi":"10.1515/humaff-2022-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Masaryk’s philosophical approach to reality is largely characterised by its orientation towards the positivism of Auguste Comte, which Masaryk sought to offset with the psychologism of J. S. Mill. The combination of these positivist approaches became the positive starting point for Masaryk’s ethics. But that was not the only influence on his ethics. Masaryk’s German translation of Hume’s book, titled Eine Untersuchung über die Prinzipien der Moral von David Hume (1883), reveals that the main stimuli that shaped Masaryk’s ideas about ethics came from David Hume. Although the need for scientific evidence became a fundamental principle of Masaryk’s thought, the need to objectively anchor ethics in rational theism necessitated in this area a departure from his positivist outlook. Masaryk’s lectures on practical philosophy attest to this fact. The reason for his departure from a positivist stance was due to the metaphysical nature of his concept of psychology.","PeriodicalId":44829,"journal":{"name":"Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly","volume":"32 1","pages":"348 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Masaryk’s philosophical approach to reality is largely characterised by its orientation towards the positivism of Auguste Comte, which Masaryk sought to offset with the psychologism of J. S. Mill. The combination of these positivist approaches became the positive starting point for Masaryk’s ethics. But that was not the only influence on his ethics. Masaryk’s German translation of Hume’s book, titled Eine Untersuchung über die Prinzipien der Moral von David Hume (1883), reveals that the main stimuli that shaped Masaryk’s ideas about ethics came from David Hume. Although the need for scientific evidence became a fundamental principle of Masaryk’s thought, the need to objectively anchor ethics in rational theism necessitated in this area a departure from his positivist outlook. Masaryk’s lectures on practical philosophy attest to this fact. The reason for his departure from a positivist stance was due to the metaphysical nature of his concept of psychology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马萨里克科学分类中的伦理学
摘要Masaryk对现实的哲学方法在很大程度上以其对奥古斯特·孔特实证主义的取向为特征,Masaryk试图用J.s.Mill的心理学来抵消这一点。这些实证主义方法的结合成为Masaryk伦理学的积极起点。但这并不是对他的道德观的唯一影响。Masaryk对休谟著作的德语翻译,题为《道德的原则》(Eine Untersuchungüber die Prinzipien der Moral von David Hume,1883),揭示了塑造Masaryk伦理思想的主要因素来自大卫·休谟。尽管对科学证据的需要成为Masaryk思想的一个基本原则,但客观地将伦理学锚定在理性有神论中的需要在这一领域有必要偏离他的实证主义观点。Masaryk关于实践哲学的讲座证明了这一事实。他偏离实证主义立场的原因是由于他心理学概念的形而上学性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Audience Democracy 2.0: Re-Depersonalizing Politics in the Digital Age Kasanda, A. and Hrubec, M. (Eds.): Africa in a Multilateral World. Afropolitan Dilemmas. New York, London: Routledge. Routledge Contemporary Africa Series, 2022. Back from the Future. Remarks on Temporality and Totality in the Birth of Classical German Philosophy Philosophy and Jena Romanticism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1