Person, Property and Contract: A critical dialogue with Hegel from Marx

Q4 Arts and Humanities Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso Pub Date : 2022-02-02 DOI:10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp9-26
Christian Iber, Agemir Bavaresco
{"title":"Person, Property and Contract: A critical dialogue with Hegel from Marx","authors":"Christian Iber, Agemir Bavaresco","doi":"10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp9-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nHegel’s Philosophy of Law deals in the Abstract Law section of the categories: person, property and contract. Research critically reconstructs this theory from a Marxist perspective. In the concept of person, first of all, the singular will is reduced to a solipsist will unrelated to intersubjectivity. Then, the concept of Hegelian property bases the private appropriation of property as the externalization of the singular will. This legal property guarantees the maintenance and reproduction of private property, that is, it will guarantee the private accumulation of capital, Marx will say. Anyway, the theory of the contract would link the autonomy of the contracting wills, however, it is a mere appearance, because, in fact, the owners’ wills are under the domination of the capitalist market, as it is explained in Marx’s Capital. The theoretical deficit of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law in general is that the legal concepts of person and property correspond to the abstract will. Hegel describes the juridical description of the legal system of the modern state as the development of free will that legitimizes the asymmetry of civil society in its socioeconomic inequalities.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":36808,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2021iss18pp9-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hegel’s Philosophy of Law deals in the Abstract Law section of the categories: person, property and contract. Research critically reconstructs this theory from a Marxist perspective. In the concept of person, first of all, the singular will is reduced to a solipsist will unrelated to intersubjectivity. Then, the concept of Hegelian property bases the private appropriation of property as the externalization of the singular will. This legal property guarantees the maintenance and reproduction of private property, that is, it will guarantee the private accumulation of capital, Marx will say. Anyway, the theory of the contract would link the autonomy of the contracting wills, however, it is a mere appearance, because, in fact, the owners’ wills are under the domination of the capitalist market, as it is explained in Marx’s Capital. The theoretical deficit of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law in general is that the legal concepts of person and property correspond to the abstract will. Hegel describes the juridical description of the legal system of the modern state as the development of free will that legitimizes the asymmetry of civil society in its socioeconomic inequalities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人、财产与契约:马克思与黑格尔的批判性对话
黑格尔的法哲学论述了抽象法部分的范畴:人、财产和契约。研究从马克思主义的角度对这一理论进行了批判性的重构。在人的概念中,首先,单数意志被简化为与主体间性无关的唯我意志。然后,黑格尔财产观将私人占有财产作为单一意志的外化。马克思会说,这种合法财产保证了私人财产的维护和再生产,也就是说,它将保证资本的私人积累。无论如何,契约理论将契约意志的自主权联系起来,但这只是表象,因为事实上,正如马克思的《资本论》所解释的那样,所有者的意志处于资本主义市场的支配之下。黑格尔法哲学的一般理论缺陷是人和财产的法律概念与抽象意志相对应。黑格尔将现代国家法律体系的司法描述描述为自由意志的发展,使公民社会在其社会经济不平等中的不对称性合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso
Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
El ideal de progreso y sus implicaciones en una educación cosmopolita desde el pensamiento kantiano Cognición motora en las ciencias de diseño Explicación y justificación: una interpretación de la epistemología naturalista de Quine a partir del antecedente kantiano Las neuronas espejo. Un caso de estudio de la relación neurociencia-filosofía What Neuroscience Tells Us About Mental Illness: Scientific Realism in the Biomedical Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1