Retrieval practice and verbal-visuospatial transfer: From memorization to inductive learning

IF 2.9 1区 心理学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of memory and language Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2022.104402
Gregory I. Hughes , Ayanna K. Thomas
{"title":"Retrieval practice and verbal-visuospatial transfer: From memorization to inductive learning","authors":"Gregory I. Hughes ,&nbsp;Ayanna K. Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.jml.2022.104402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Retrieval practice, the act of recalling information on a practice test, leads to better long-term memory than non-testing study activities (<em>the testing effect</em>). This effect occurs even when the contexts of the practice and final test differ, suggesting that retrieval practice fosters transferable learning. For example, practice tests involving the recall of targets (A-?) not only enhance performance on final tests of the targets (A-?), but this effect can also extend to tests of the non-recalled cues (?-B). Simple memory tests can also facilitate the inference of underlying rules or principles that can be used to answer completely new questions or problems. However, these transfer effects have been overwhelmingly demonstrated with verbal materials. Further, research suggests that transfer effects diminish as the type of information tested during the practice and final tests diverge. In the present study, we explored the influence of retrieval practice on paired associates consisting of the names and visuospatial diagrams of molecules. In two experiments using a standard paired-associate learning paradigm, practice tests of name targets (?-diagram) or diagram targets (name-?) did not enhance performance on final tests of their respective cues. In a final experiment using a category induction paradigm, we found a benefit of retrieval practice on the memorization of cues and the induction of underlying rules simultaneously.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of memory and language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of memory and language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X22000894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrieval practice, the act of recalling information on a practice test, leads to better long-term memory than non-testing study activities (the testing effect). This effect occurs even when the contexts of the practice and final test differ, suggesting that retrieval practice fosters transferable learning. For example, practice tests involving the recall of targets (A-?) not only enhance performance on final tests of the targets (A-?), but this effect can also extend to tests of the non-recalled cues (?-B). Simple memory tests can also facilitate the inference of underlying rules or principles that can be used to answer completely new questions or problems. However, these transfer effects have been overwhelmingly demonstrated with verbal materials. Further, research suggests that transfer effects diminish as the type of information tested during the practice and final tests diverge. In the present study, we explored the influence of retrieval practice on paired associates consisting of the names and visuospatial diagrams of molecules. In two experiments using a standard paired-associate learning paradigm, practice tests of name targets (?-diagram) or diagram targets (name-?) did not enhance performance on final tests of their respective cues. In a final experiment using a category induction paradigm, we found a benefit of retrieval practice on the memorization of cues and the induction of underlying rules simultaneously.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检索练习与语言-视觉空间迁移:从记忆到归纳学习
检索练习,在练习测试中回忆信息的行为,比非测试性的学习活动(测试效果)产生更好的长期记忆。即使练习和最终测试的背景不同,这种效果也会出现,这表明检索练习促进了可转移学习。例如,涉及回忆目标(A-?)的练习测试不仅提高了目标(A-?)的最终测试的表现,而且这种效果也可以扩展到未回忆的线索(?- b)的测试。简单的记忆测试还可以促进对潜在规则或原则的推断,这些规则或原则可用于回答全新的问题或问题。然而,这些迁移效应在语言材料中得到了压倒性的证明。此外,研究表明,迁移效应随着在实践和最终测试中测试的信息类型的不同而减弱。在本研究中,我们探讨了检索练习对由分子名称和视觉空间图组成的成对联想的影响。在使用标准配对联想学习范式的两个实验中,名称目标(-图表)或图表目标(-名称)的练习测试并没有提高他们各自线索的最终测试的表现。在最后一个使用类别归纳范式的实验中,我们发现检索练习对线索的记忆和潜在规则的归纳同时有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12.7 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles in the Journal of Memory and Language contribute to the formulation of scientific issues and theories in the areas of memory, language comprehension and production, and cognitive processes. Special emphasis is given to research articles that provide new theoretical insights based on a carefully laid empirical foundation. The journal generally favors articles that provide multiple experiments. In addition, significant theoretical papers without new experimental findings may be published. The Journal of Memory and Language is a valuable tool for cognitive scientists, including psychologists, linguists, and others interested in memory and learning, language, reading, and speech. Research Areas include: • Topics that illuminate aspects of memory or language processing • Linguistics • Neuropsychology.
期刊最新文献
Self-Reported attention to changes and associations with episodic memory updating Individual differences in the reactivity effect of judgments of learning: Cognitive factors Understanding with the body? Testing the role of verb relative embodiment across tasks at the interface of language and memory Visual context benefits spoken sentence comprehension across the lifespan Setting the “tone” first and then integrating it into the syllable: An EEG investigation of the time course of lexical tone and syllable encoding in Mandarin word production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1