Caenorhabditis elegans for predictive toxicology

IF 3.6 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Current Opinion in Toxicology Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cotox.2020.02.004
Piper Reid Hunt, Jessica A. Camacho, Robert L. Sprando
{"title":"Caenorhabditis elegans for predictive toxicology","authors":"Piper Reid Hunt,&nbsp;Jessica A. Camacho,&nbsp;Robert L. Sprando","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2020.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The nematode <span><em>Caenorhabditis elegans</em></span> offers great potential to address the need for faster and more reliable testing methods for predictive toxicology. The duration and cost of running <em>C. elegans</em> assays is comparable to cell-based <em>in vitro</em><span> testing, yet allows for toxic exposure information in a whole animal with many genetic, developmental, neuronal, and toxic mode of action<span><span> processes that are conserved with mammals. Demonstrated areas of concordance for toxic response include aging, aneuploidy<span> and germ cell genome abnormalities, growth and development<span><span>, mammalian LD50 prediction, and neurotoxicity. Newer avenues of exploration, such as </span>epigenetic regulation, innate immunity effects, and </span></span></span>mutagenicity<span> via DNA damage responses, also show promise. For predictive toxicology, the </span></span></span><em>C. elegans</em> model is most likely to prove useful as a complementary tool for early toxicity screening, as well as for the identification of conserved modes of toxic action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2020.02.004","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202020300127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans offers great potential to address the need for faster and more reliable testing methods for predictive toxicology. The duration and cost of running C. elegans assays is comparable to cell-based in vitro testing, yet allows for toxic exposure information in a whole animal with many genetic, developmental, neuronal, and toxic mode of action processes that are conserved with mammals. Demonstrated areas of concordance for toxic response include aging, aneuploidy and germ cell genome abnormalities, growth and development, mammalian LD50 prediction, and neurotoxicity. Newer avenues of exploration, such as epigenetic regulation, innate immunity effects, and mutagenicity via DNA damage responses, also show promise. For predictive toxicology, the C. elegans model is most likely to prove useful as a complementary tool for early toxicity screening, as well as for the identification of conserved modes of toxic action.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秀丽隐杆线虫的预测毒理学
秀丽隐杆线虫提供了巨大的潜力,以满足对预测毒理学更快和更可靠的测试方法的需求。运行秀丽隐杆线虫试验的持续时间和成本与基于细胞的体外测试相当,但允许在整个动物中具有许多遗传,发育,神经元和毒性作用模式过程的毒性暴露信息,这些过程在哺乳动物中是保守的。已证实的毒性反应的一致性领域包括衰老、非整倍体和生殖细胞基因组异常、生长发育、哺乳动物LD50预测和神经毒性。新的探索途径,如表观遗传调控、先天免疫效应和通过DNA损伤反应的诱变性,也显示出希望。对于预测毒理学,秀丽隐杆线虫模型最有可能被证明是一种有用的补充工具,用于早期毒性筛选,以及鉴定毒性作用的保守模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Current Opinion in Toxicology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mixture toxicity: A hot topic in toxicology and chemical risk assessment Editorial: Guardians of Tomorrow: Developmental Toxicology for Future Generations Editorial: Role of the microbiome in toxicology How single-cell transcriptomics provides insight on hepatic responses to TCDD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1