Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review

IF 6.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Business Review Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101641
Marcelo Dionisio, Eduardo Raupp de Vargas
{"title":"Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review","authors":"Marcelo Dionisio,&nbsp;Eduardo Raupp de Vargas","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper studies a timely but theoretically underspecified relationship between multinational corporations (MNCs) and the concept of corporate social innovation (CSI), which we argue is the latest and definitive alternative for companies to help solve social problems through innovative procedures and strategies while reaching economic results. Through a systematic literature review, this study selected 89 articles and performed a descriptive and a thematic analysis of the literature to address the following research questions: How has the CSI concept evolved? How is CSI similar to or different from other concepts?</p><p>The study finds that new paradigms could reinvent institutions as they open new possibilities for solving social problems by giving businesses a new way to innovate while examples are given that are still works in progress but that tomorrow could be the way business is done everywhere.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"29 2","pages":"Article 101641"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101641","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593118309004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

This paper studies a timely but theoretically underspecified relationship between multinational corporations (MNCs) and the concept of corporate social innovation (CSI), which we argue is the latest and definitive alternative for companies to help solve social problems through innovative procedures and strategies while reaching economic results. Through a systematic literature review, this study selected 89 articles and performed a descriptive and a thematic analysis of the literature to address the following research questions: How has the CSI concept evolved? How is CSI similar to or different from other concepts?

The study finds that new paradigms could reinvent institutions as they open new possibilities for solving social problems by giving businesses a new way to innovate while examples are given that are still works in progress but that tomorrow could be the way business is done everywhere.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业社会创新:系统文献综述
本文研究了跨国公司(MNCs)与企业社会创新(CSI)概念之间的及时但理论上未明确的关系,我们认为这是公司通过创新程序和战略帮助解决社会问题同时取得经济成果的最新和明确的选择。通过系统的文献回顾,本研究选择了89篇文章,并对文献进行了描述性和主题性分析,以解决以下研究问题:CSI概念是如何演变的?CSI与其他概念有什么相似或不同之处?研究发现,新的模式可以重塑制度,因为它们为解决社会问题开辟了新的可能性,为企业提供了一种新的创新方式,同时给出的例子仍在进行中,但未来可能是世界各地开展业务的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.
期刊最新文献
A state-market interplay framework for strategic knowledge management in Chinese MNEs One-off export experiences and firms’ product- and country-scope export expansion: Evidence from two decades of monthly data Multinational enterprises (MNEs), heterogeneity in corporate social responsibility (CSR), and subsidiary employment in host countries: A signaling perspective Bilateral geopolitical risk and equity ownership in cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging-market firms: Non-market strategies as legitimacy buffers A multilevel framework for analysing organisational misconduct in emerging economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1