Pub Date : 2025-01-06DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102387
Christos Pitelis, Catherine L. Wang, Mathew Hughes, Véronique Ambrosini
The dynamic capabilities view (DCV) and international entrepreneurship perspective (IEP) are major, relatively recent advances in international business (IB), strategy, and entrepreneurship. Despite their different disciplinary backgrounds—DCV in evolutionary economics and the resource-based view and the IEP in entrepreneurship and marketing—they share many themes and ideas in common, which have only recently started being acknowledged. In this article, we explore the contribution of, and interrelationship between, the two approaches, their limitations and scope for further development. Key insights include that the DCV helps complement IEP in terms of its focus on value co-creation and the requisite reconfiguration of resources to help bring about value capture. In turn, IEP complements DCV in terms of its exploration of the nature of opportunities and the entrepreneurial capabilities to sense these, and in terms of providing supporting evidence about these capabilities.
{"title":"Towards a better understanding of the interrelationship between dynamic capabilities and international Entrepreneurship","authors":"Christos Pitelis, Catherine L. Wang, Mathew Hughes, Véronique Ambrosini","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102387","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102387","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The dynamic capabilities view (DCV) and international entrepreneurship perspective (IEP) are major, relatively recent advances in international business (IB), strategy, and entrepreneurship. Despite their different disciplinary backgrounds—DCV in evolutionary economics and the resource-based view and the IEP in entrepreneurship and marketing—they share many themes and ideas in common, which have only recently started being acknowledged. In this article, we explore the contribution of, and interrelationship between, the two approaches, their limitations and scope for further development. Key insights include that the DCV helps complement IEP in terms of its focus on value co-creation and the requisite reconfiguration of resources to help bring about value capture. In turn, IEP complements DCV in terms of its exploration of the nature of opportunities and the entrepreneurial capabilities to sense these, and in terms of providing supporting evidence about these capabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 2","pages":"Article 102387"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143179255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102384
Vinit M. Desai
Institutional voids describe settings with weak market arrangements. While these voids can deter corporate investment, some organizations seek these challenging environments. Why is that so? This paper addresses the question by suggesting that while voids pose risks, they can also provide competitive and institutional flexibility. The study’s framework suggests that firms are attracted to weak institutional environments with tolerable risks, and also counterintuitively less deterred when these risks rise to extremely high levels. Empirically, the study examines global oceanic shipping patterns to determine whether and how commercial shippers change course in response to maritime piracy incidents such as hijackings and thefts against their vessels, as these incidents typically occur offshore from countries with weak institutional structures. Interestingly, although piracy generally deters oceanic shipping, findings support the study’s predictions that companies make exceptions to continue accessing markets with relatively tolerable or extremely high risks.
{"title":"Entering dangerous territory: Why corporate investment is sometimes attracted to institutional voids","authors":"Vinit M. Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102384","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102384","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Institutional voids describe settings with weak market arrangements. While these voids can deter corporate investment, some organizations seek these challenging environments. Why is that so? This paper addresses the question by suggesting that while voids pose risks, they can also provide competitive and institutional flexibility. The study’s framework suggests that firms are attracted to weak institutional environments with tolerable risks, and also counterintuitively less deterred when these risks rise to extremely high levels. Empirically, the study examines global oceanic shipping patterns to determine whether and how commercial shippers change course in response to maritime piracy incidents such as hijackings and thefts against their vessels, as these incidents typically occur offshore from countries with weak institutional structures. Interestingly, although piracy generally deters oceanic shipping, findings support the study’s predictions that companies make exceptions to continue accessing markets with relatively tolerable or extremely high risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 2","pages":"Article 102384"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143179262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102383
Eric W.K. Tsang , Asli M. Colpan
Recently there have been suggestions for qualitative international business researchers to deal with under-researched and thus unfamiliar contexts of their fieldwork through a process of contextualization. However, in-depth contextualization of a study may be so unique that it inhibits the generalization of a study beyond its context, producing results that have little scientific value. Complementing these contextualization suggestions, our paper addresses the generalization aspect of international business research through drawing examples from a sample of qualitative studies published in International Business Review, Journal of International Business Studies, and Journal of World Business from 2019 to 2023. We discuss how scholars can seek a balance between contextualization and generalization, proposing a five-step approach that helps to develop a unified (rather than fragmented) body of knowledge from qualitative empirical research. Although our discussion is international business-based, our five-step approach is applicable to qualitative management and organizational research in general.
{"title":"Reconciling the tension between contextualization and generalization in qualitative international business research","authors":"Eric W.K. Tsang , Asli M. Colpan","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102383","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102383","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently there have been suggestions for qualitative international business researchers to deal with under-researched and thus unfamiliar contexts of their fieldwork through a process of contextualization. However, in-depth contextualization of a study may be so unique that it inhibits the generalization of a study beyond its context, producing results that have little scientific value. Complementing these contextualization suggestions, our paper addresses the generalization aspect of international business research through drawing examples from a sample of qualitative studies published in <em>International Business Review</em>, <em>Journal of International Business Studies</em>, and <em>Journal of World Business</em> from 2019 to 2023. We discuss how scholars can seek a balance between contextualization and generalization, proposing a five-step approach that helps to develop a unified (rather than fragmented) body of knowledge from qualitative empirical research. Although our discussion is international business-based, our five-step approach is applicable to qualitative management and organizational research in general.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 2","pages":"Article 102383"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143179259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper explores the role of agency in the social construction of institutional voids, rather than seeing them primarily as given. Drawing on case studies of Microsoft in Juarez, Mexico, and Randstad in Buenos Aires, Argentina, we study the interplay among institutional logics, voids, and social innovation practices to fill the voids. We find that organizational practices embedded in institutional logics can collide with social reality and hamper the attainment of organizational goals (void experience). This prompts MNEs to experiment with novel solutions embedded in distinct logics (void enactment) in alignment with the organization´s identity. By outlining an agentic model of void experience and enactment, we provide a fresh perspective on voids to international business scholars and call attention to the social constructivist roots of institutional theory in studying social innovation by multinationals in emerging markets.
{"title":"How institutional voids are experienced and enacted through social innovation initiatives by multinationals in emerging markets","authors":"Maximino Matus-Ruiz , Ayse Saka-Helmhout , Jorge Carillo","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102382","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102382","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the role of agency in the social construction of institutional voids, rather than seeing them primarily as given. Drawing on case studies of Microsoft in Juarez, Mexico, and Randstad in Buenos Aires, Argentina, we study the interplay among institutional logics, voids, and social innovation practices to fill the voids. We find that organizational practices embedded in institutional logics can collide with social reality and hamper the attainment of organizational goals (<em>void experience</em>). This prompts MNEs to experiment with novel solutions embedded in distinct logics (<em>void enactment</em>) in alignment with the organization´s identity. By outlining an agentic model of void experience and enactment, we provide a fresh perspective on voids to international business scholars and call attention to the social constructivist roots of institutional theory in studying social innovation by multinationals in emerging markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 2","pages":"Article 102382"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143179256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-28DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102380
Juliane Engsig , Bo B. Nielsen , Andry Ramaroson , Paul Chiambaretto
This paper investigates the importance of microlocation factors in FDI. Combining the literature on international business and economic geography, we focus on how the spatial determinants, measured as global city attributes, affect international strategic alliance formation patterns. Methodologically, we investigate this through a configurational analysis of American companies having created international strategic alliances during 2015 and 2019. We identify three types of city clusters where American partners have created international alliances. The identified city clusters are explained further by firm, industry, and national factors. Based on the findings, we conclude that spatial attributes should be included when understanding international alliance formation.
{"title":"How can global city attributes explain international strategic alliance formation?","authors":"Juliane Engsig , Bo B. Nielsen , Andry Ramaroson , Paul Chiambaretto","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102380","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102380","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the importance of microlocation factors in FDI. Combining the literature on international business and economic geography, we focus on how the spatial determinants, measured as global city attributes, affect international strategic alliance formation patterns. Methodologically, we investigate this through a configurational analysis of American companies having created international strategic alliances during 2015 and 2019. We identify three types of city clusters where American partners have created international alliances. The identified city clusters are explained further by firm, industry, and national factors. Based on the findings, we conclude that spatial attributes should be included when understanding international alliance formation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 2","pages":"Article 102380"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143179260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102362
Elaine Farndale , Sven Horak , Rakoon Piyanontalee , Sheila M. Puffer , Maja Vidović
Recent global challenges, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic, have underscored the critical role of human resources in international business, pushing disruptions and innovations to the forefront of international human resource management (IHRM) research and practice. This special issue editorial provides a timely and in-depth examination of the evolving IHRM landscape, reflecting on the profound changes brought by the pandemic and investigating the transformative potential of AI-driven innovations in shaping an uncertain future. Through our exploration, we challenge several dangerous assumptions that global leaders must navigate and propose a forward-looking research agenda for the IHRM field. Our analysis highlights five key themes: (1) demographic shifts and diversity, (2) evolving patterns in globalization and global mobility, (3) the complexities of managing global workforces, (4) emerging dynamics in international careers, and (5) the role of multinational enterprises (MNEs) and international small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Together, these themes offer a comprehensive framework for advancing IHRM research and practice in an increasingly complex and dynamic global environment.
{"title":"Looking back to look forward: Disruption, innovation and future trends in international human resource management","authors":"Elaine Farndale , Sven Horak , Rakoon Piyanontalee , Sheila M. Puffer , Maja Vidović","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102362","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102362","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent global challenges, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic, have underscored the critical role of human resources in international business, pushing disruptions and innovations to the forefront of international human resource management (IHRM) research and practice. This special issue editorial provides a timely and in-depth examination of the evolving IHRM landscape, reflecting on the profound changes brought by the pandemic and investigating the transformative potential of AI-driven innovations in shaping an uncertain future. Through our exploration, we challenge several dangerous assumptions that global leaders must navigate and propose a forward-looking research agenda for the IHRM field. Our analysis highlights five key themes: (1) demographic shifts and diversity, (2) evolving patterns in globalization and global mobility, (3) the complexities of managing global workforces, (4) emerging dynamics in international careers, and (5) the role of multinational enterprises (MNEs) and international small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Together, these themes offer a comprehensive framework for advancing IHRM research and practice in an increasingly complex and dynamic global environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"Article 102362"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142662964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-02DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102359
Danni Ma , Anthony Fee
This study explores the ‘micro-contextual’ conditions (individual, situational, interpersonal) affecting the willingness of host country nationals (HCNs) to share knowledge with peers in overseas subsidiaries. Our interviews with Chinese consultants in foreign-owned multinational firms in China extend current understanding of the breadth and types of considerations HCNs weigh up. We show that both collaborative and competitive dynamics shape their willingness to share knowledge, with self-interest typically trumping organizational interests. We also draw attention to the performative nature of knowledge sharing by revealing how HCNs’ perceptions of the knowledge-sharing processes, not just the outcomes, matter. Considerations like the difficulty, the visibility, and the actors involved in the process all contribute to HCNs’ willingness to share knowledge with other subsidiaries.
{"title":"The micro-contextual conditions that influence host-country nationals’ decisions about horizontal knowledge sharing in multinational enterprises in China","authors":"Danni Ma , Anthony Fee","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102359","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102359","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the ‘micro-contextual’ conditions (individual, situational, interpersonal) affecting the willingness of host country nationals (HCNs) to share knowledge with peers in overseas subsidiaries. Our interviews with Chinese consultants in foreign-owned multinational firms in China extend current understanding of the breadth and types of considerations HCNs weigh up. We show that both collaborative and competitive dynamics shape their willingness to share knowledge, with self-interest typically trumping organizational interests. We also draw attention to the performative nature of knowledge sharing by revealing how HCNs’ perceptions of the knowledge-sharing processes, not just the outcomes, matter. Considerations like the difficulty, the visibility, and the actors involved in the process all contribute to HCNs’ willingness to share knowledge with other subsidiaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"Article 102359"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142662960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The internationalisation of family firms is increasingly argued to be influenced by institutions external to the firm. In this paper, drawing on institutional and mixed gamble theories, we argue that family firms' choice of foreign subsidiary establishment mode varies based on the degree of family business legitimacy (FBL) in their home and host countries. We propose that both the individual and combined effects of home and host FBL influence this choice. Additionally, we contend that cultural distance between the home and host countries moderates the aforementioned effect. Our hypotheses are tested using a sample of 147 family firms over the period 2011–2019. Overall, our research contributes to a greater understanding of the role of external institutions on the foreign subsidiary establishment mode choice of family firms.
{"title":"Family business legitimacy and foreign subsidiary establishment mode choice: An institutional and mixed gamble approach","authors":"Jacqueline Lyons , Palitha Konara , Vikrant Shirodkar","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102360","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102360","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The internationalisation of family firms is increasingly argued to be influenced by institutions external to the firm. In this paper, drawing on institutional and mixed gamble theories, we argue that family firms' choice of foreign subsidiary establishment mode varies based on the degree of family business legitimacy (FBL) in their home and host countries. We propose that both the individual and combined effects of home and host FBL influence this choice. Additionally, we contend that cultural distance between the home and host countries moderates the aforementioned effect. Our hypotheses are tested using a sample of 147 family firms over the period 2011–2019. Overall, our research contributes to a greater understanding of the role of external institutions on the foreign subsidiary establishment mode choice of family firms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 2","pages":"Article 102360"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143179261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102358
Hongyan Qu , Zhujun Ding , David Ahlstrom , Changqi Wu , Huifen Helen Cai
This study investigates how the motivations of firms to expand internationally via exporting in rather different contexts can be explained through either the more traditional “ability to export” as held in the resource-based view of the firm or with a behavioral theory perspective. In a riskier context with numerous roadblocks to international trade and investment, this study found support for the behavioral perspective, showing that under- and over-performing firms in that challenging context tended to export more as a result of problemistic search and slack search, while the firms performing around their aspiration levels tended to export less. And this effect proved stronger for smaller firms and non-state enterprises. In contrast, when the conditions for international expansion turned less risky, due to reduced trade barriers, clearer rules and adjudication, the better-performing, larger, and state-owned firms with more resources tended to engage in more exporting activities than others, supporting the resource-based explanations for taking fairly bold strategic action. Based on data from China’s pharmaceutical firms in a time of major institutional change during the pre- and post-WTO periods, this study revealed that firms’ incentives and propensity for undertaking exports change, with changes in the context and the relevant risks. This underscores the importance of selecting and applying theories judiciously when examining firms' international expansion behaviors, particularly given significant contextual change.
{"title":"When I have to versus when I am able to: Behavioral and resource explanations for firms’ international expansion via exporting","authors":"Hongyan Qu , Zhujun Ding , David Ahlstrom , Changqi Wu , Huifen Helen Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102358","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102358","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how the motivations of firms to expand internationally via exporting in rather different contexts can be explained through either the more traditional “ability to export” as held in the resource-based view of the firm or with a behavioral theory perspective. In a riskier context with numerous roadblocks to international trade and investment, this study found support for the behavioral perspective, showing that under- and over-performing firms in that challenging context tended to export more as a result of problemistic search and slack search, while the firms performing around their aspiration levels tended to export less. And this effect proved stronger for smaller firms and non-state enterprises. In contrast, when the conditions for international expansion turned less risky, due to reduced trade barriers, clearer rules and adjudication, the better-performing, larger, and state-owned firms with more resources tended to engage in more exporting activities than others, supporting the resource-based explanations for taking fairly bold strategic action. Based on data from China’s pharmaceutical firms in a time of major institutional change during the pre- and post-WTO periods, this study revealed that firms’ incentives and propensity for undertaking exports change, with changes in the context and the relevant risks. This underscores the importance of selecting and applying theories judiciously when examining firms' international expansion behaviors, particularly given significant contextual change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"Article 102358"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142663078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-10DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102357
Nadeera Ranabahu , Huibert P. de Vries , Zhiyan Basharati
Multinational corporations (MNCs), through action or inaction, directly and indirectly shape vertical, horizontal, or internal structural inequalities in labour markets. The refugee employment literature has given scant attention to the role of MNCs, and how these corporations can or do contribute to achieving equality in employment outcomes for diverse social groups such as refugees. In this paper, we explore how MNCs seek to address challenges associated with structural inequalities to achieve greater equality in employment outcomes for refugees. To do so, we draw on the refugee employment literature, industry evidence, and business reports. Our findings reveal that MNCs require global and national-level responses to address structural inequalities associated with vertical, horizontal, or internal inequalities. We synthesise these inequalities into a conceptual framework and illustrate the need for MNCs to balance standardisation vs localisation strategies in human resource and diversity management, sourcing and supply chain management, corporate social responsibility, marketing and branding, and external engagement. Such MNC strategies contribute to refugees’ ability to navigate structural factors that create employment inequalities.
{"title":"Refugees’ employment: Adapting a structural inequality framework for multinational corporations","authors":"Nadeera Ranabahu , Huibert P. de Vries , Zhiyan Basharati","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102357","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102357","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multinational corporations (MNCs), through action or inaction, directly and indirectly shape vertical, horizontal, or internal structural inequalities in labour markets. The refugee employment literature has given scant attention to the role of MNCs, and how these corporations can or do contribute to achieving equality in employment outcomes for diverse social groups such as refugees. In this paper, we explore how MNCs seek to address challenges associated with structural inequalities to achieve greater equality in employment outcomes for refugees. To do so, we draw on the refugee employment literature, industry evidence, and business reports. Our findings reveal that MNCs require global and national-level responses to address structural inequalities associated with vertical, horizontal, or internal inequalities. We synthesise these inequalities into a conceptual framework and illustrate the need for MNCs to balance standardisation vs localisation strategies in human resource and diversity management, sourcing and supply chain management, corporate social responsibility, marketing and branding, and external engagement. Such MNC strategies contribute to refugees’ ability to navigate structural factors that create employment inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"Article 102357"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142662965","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号