Cervical Spinal Cord Transection (SCT) Increases Gastric Compliance in Anesthetized Rats

Radu Fodor, D. Bratu, C. Ionescu, Hassan Noor, C. Cheregi, M. Muresan
{"title":"Cervical Spinal Cord Transection (SCT) Increases Gastric Compliance in Anesthetized Rats","authors":"Radu Fodor, D. Bratu, C. Ionescu, Hassan Noor, C. Cheregi, M. Muresan","doi":"10.2478/amtsb-2021-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Spinal cord injury (SCI) can markedly alter the autonomic nervous system’s functions. It immediately causes autonomic and somatic hypo- or arreflexia, a state known as spinal shock. SCI determines the enhancement of two gastric reflexes that appear in normal conditions: the receptive and adaptative reflexes. Furthermore, this study also tried to evaluate the causes that led to such modifications: either vagal control, nitric oxide (NO)-pathways or intestine-intestinal reflexes. Male Wistar rats (N=25) were subjected to laminectomy (Sham group) or laminectomy + complete Spinal Cord Transection (SCT), between C7 and T1 vertebrae under anesthesia (SCT group). Before the surgery, the rats had water and food ad libitum; after the surgery, rats were fasted for 24 hours, still having access to water. The next day, all animals were subjected to a catheterism of their right carotid artery, a tracheostomy and a flexible balloon introduction down to the stomach’s fundix region, also under anesthesia. Rats were connected to a Power-Lab® system, via a pressure transducer (in order to measure the arterial pressure – MAP - and the heart rate - HR), and to a modified Plethysmometer (in order to measure the fundical gastric volume - GV variation). Vagal control was studied via cervical vagotomy; NO-mediation - via NO synthesis inhibitors (L-NAME); intestinointestinal reflexes - by using laxatives (Lactulone). Statistical analysis revealed, in some cases, that GV is significantly (p<0.05) augmented in SCT rats (2,4±0,09; 3,1±0,05; 3,7±0,06 ml) than in Sham (2,2±0,12; 2,9±0,12; 3,3±0,15 ml). Nevertheless, MAP and HR, were subsequently lower (p<0.05) in SCT (63,5±21,1mm Hg; 227,1±25,2 BPM) than in the control group (88,2±14,4mm Hg; 427,0±19,2 BPM). In summary, the increase of GV in SCT, seems to involve vagal pathways and/or NO-mediation, but still not neglecting the colic-gastric reflexes.","PeriodicalId":7091,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Transilvanica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Transilvanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amtsb-2021-0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Spinal cord injury (SCI) can markedly alter the autonomic nervous system’s functions. It immediately causes autonomic and somatic hypo- or arreflexia, a state known as spinal shock. SCI determines the enhancement of two gastric reflexes that appear in normal conditions: the receptive and adaptative reflexes. Furthermore, this study also tried to evaluate the causes that led to such modifications: either vagal control, nitric oxide (NO)-pathways or intestine-intestinal reflexes. Male Wistar rats (N=25) were subjected to laminectomy (Sham group) or laminectomy + complete Spinal Cord Transection (SCT), between C7 and T1 vertebrae under anesthesia (SCT group). Before the surgery, the rats had water and food ad libitum; after the surgery, rats were fasted for 24 hours, still having access to water. The next day, all animals were subjected to a catheterism of their right carotid artery, a tracheostomy and a flexible balloon introduction down to the stomach’s fundix region, also under anesthesia. Rats were connected to a Power-Lab® system, via a pressure transducer (in order to measure the arterial pressure – MAP - and the heart rate - HR), and to a modified Plethysmometer (in order to measure the fundical gastric volume - GV variation). Vagal control was studied via cervical vagotomy; NO-mediation - via NO synthesis inhibitors (L-NAME); intestinointestinal reflexes - by using laxatives (Lactulone). Statistical analysis revealed, in some cases, that GV is significantly (p<0.05) augmented in SCT rats (2,4±0,09; 3,1±0,05; 3,7±0,06 ml) than in Sham (2,2±0,12; 2,9±0,12; 3,3±0,15 ml). Nevertheless, MAP and HR, were subsequently lower (p<0.05) in SCT (63,5±21,1mm Hg; 227,1±25,2 BPM) than in the control group (88,2±14,4mm Hg; 427,0±19,2 BPM). In summary, the increase of GV in SCT, seems to involve vagal pathways and/or NO-mediation, but still not neglecting the colic-gastric reflexes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈脊髓横断(SCT)增加麻醉大鼠胃顺应性
脊髓损伤(SCI)可显著改变自主神经系统功能。它会立即引起自主神经和躯体反射不足或反射不足,这种状态被称为脊髓休克。脊髓损伤决定了正常情况下出现的两种胃反射的增强:接受性反射和适应性反射。此外,本研究还试图评估导致这种改变的原因:迷走神经控制,一氧化氮(NO)途径或肠-肠反射。雄性Wistar大鼠(N=25)在麻醉下行C7 ~ T1椎体椎板切除术(Sham组)或椎板切除术+完全脊髓横断(SCT组)。手术前,大鼠可随意饮水和进食;手术后,大鼠禁食24小时,仍可获得水。第二天,所有的动物都接受了右颈动脉插管,气管切开术和软性球囊引入胃底区,同样是在麻醉下。大鼠通过压力传感器(用于测量动脉压- MAP -和心率- HR)和改良容积计(用于测量胃底容积- GV变化)连接到Power-Lab®系统。通过颈部迷走神经切开术研究迷走神经控制;NO-中介-通过NO合成抑制剂(L-NAME);肠道反射-通过使用泻药(内酯酮)。统计分析显示,在某些情况下,SCT大鼠的GV显著(p<0.05)增强(2,4±0,09;3、1±0 05;3,7±0,06 ml)比Sham组(2,2±0,12 ml;2、9±0 12;3、3±0 15毫升)。然而,SCT的MAP和HR随后降低(p<0.05)(63,5±21,1mm Hg;227,1±25,2 BPM)比对照组(88,2±14,4mm Hg;427年,0±19日2 BPM)。总之,SCT中GV的增加似乎涉及迷走神经通路和/或no介导,但仍不能忽视结肠-胃反射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Five-Factor Model Approach to Hypertensive Patients: A Case Control Study Analysis of the Demographic Phenomenon of Fertility in Romania from 1950-2021 Kawasaki Disease Undiagnosed in Childhood, Myocardial Infarction in Adulthood - Case Report Considerations Regarding the Management of Dental Procedures in Patients with Anticoagulant Medication: Case Presentation The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Telemedicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1