An Exploration of Factors Impacting Middle School Students’ Attitudes Toward Computer Programming

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.1080/07380569.2021.1882209
Mete Akcaoglu, J. Rosenberg, Charles B. Hodges, J. Hilpert
{"title":"An Exploration of Factors Impacting Middle School Students’ Attitudes Toward Computer Programming","authors":"Mete Akcaoglu, J. Rosenberg, Charles B. Hodges, J. Hilpert","doi":"10.1080/07380569.2021.1882209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Computer programming is becoming an essential skill for young students regardless of their education or career goals. Therefore, for students to develop and for educators and researchers to accurately measure self-efficacy in and value for programming is important. Although student motivation in subject matter can be measured using self-report surveys, these types of instruments are prone to error due to inherent biases. In this quasi-experimental and cross-sectional study, we examined whether using a computer programming pretest before taking a perception survey (i.e., providing examples of the key concept in the survey beforehand) had an impact on students’ self-reported self-efficacy and utility value, thus helping collect more accurate data. Results showed no significant difference on self-efficacy and value scores between those who received a pretest and those who did not. In further analysis, however, it was found that pretest performance was positively correlated with self-efficacy and value. In addition, boys reported significantly higher self-efficacy and value than girls, confirming gender disparity outlined in previous research. An exploratory, but important, finding was that there was an interaction between gender and test performance for the self-efficacy and utility value. While boys’ who had high pretest scores also reported higher levels of self-efficacy and utility value, it was the opposite for girls.","PeriodicalId":45769,"journal":{"name":"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07380569.2021.1882209","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2021.1882209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Computer programming is becoming an essential skill for young students regardless of their education or career goals. Therefore, for students to develop and for educators and researchers to accurately measure self-efficacy in and value for programming is important. Although student motivation in subject matter can be measured using self-report surveys, these types of instruments are prone to error due to inherent biases. In this quasi-experimental and cross-sectional study, we examined whether using a computer programming pretest before taking a perception survey (i.e., providing examples of the key concept in the survey beforehand) had an impact on students’ self-reported self-efficacy and utility value, thus helping collect more accurate data. Results showed no significant difference on self-efficacy and value scores between those who received a pretest and those who did not. In further analysis, however, it was found that pretest performance was positively correlated with self-efficacy and value. In addition, boys reported significantly higher self-efficacy and value than girls, confirming gender disparity outlined in previous research. An exploratory, but important, finding was that there was an interaction between gender and test performance for the self-efficacy and utility value. While boys’ who had high pretest scores also reported higher levels of self-efficacy and utility value, it was the opposite for girls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响中学生计算机程序设计态度的因素探讨
计算机编程正成为年轻学生的一项基本技能,无论他们的教育背景或职业目标如何。因此,对于学生的发展和教育工作者和研究人员来说,准确地测量编程的自我效能和价值是很重要的。虽然学生在主题上的动机可以使用自我报告调查来衡量,但由于固有的偏见,这些类型的工具容易出错。在这项准实验和横断面研究中,我们考察了在进行感知调查之前使用计算机编程预测(即事先提供调查中关键概念的示例)是否会影响学生自我报告的自我效能感和效用价值,从而有助于收集更准确的数据。结果显示,接受预测者和未接受预测者在自我效能和价值得分上没有显著差异。然而,在进一步的分析中,我们发现测试前的表现与自我效能和价值呈正相关。此外,男孩报告的自我效能和价值显著高于女孩,证实了先前研究中概述的性别差异。一个探索性但重要的发现是,性别与自我效能感和效用价值的测试表现之间存在相互作用。虽然测试前得分高的男孩也报告了更高的自我效能感和效用价值,但女孩的情况恰恰相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Under the editorship of D. LaMont Johnson, PhD, a nationally recognized leader in the field of educational computing, Computers in the Schools is supported by an editorial review board of prominent specialists in the school and educational setting. Material presented in this highly acclaimed journal goes beyond the “how we did it” magazine article or handbook by offering a rich source of serious discussion for educators, administrators, computer center directors, and special service providers in the school setting. Articles emphasize the practical aspect of any application, but also tie theory to practice, relate present accomplishments to past efforts and future trends, identify conclusions and their implications.
期刊最新文献
Automated Assessment of Students’ Interactions with Visual Representations: A Metacognitive Perspective on Comparing Fractions The Use of a Multimedia-Enabled, Serialized Worked-Example Artifact in an Online Environment for Secondary Education Motivation and Mathematical Performance Using Digital Game-Based Learning in Kindergarten Digital Security in Educational Contexts: Digital Competence and Challenges for Good Practice Technological and Sustainable Security: A Longitudinal Study on Teacher Training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1