The Evasive Racism of Caste—and the Homological Power of the "Aryan" Doctrine

IF 1.3 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Critical Philosophy of Race Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5325/critphilrace.11.1.0209
D. Dwivedi
{"title":"The Evasive Racism of Caste—and the Homological Power of the \"Aryan\" Doctrine","authors":"D. Dwivedi","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.11.1.0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In the fight against racism, philosophy has to interrogate caste in its own histories and current decolonial consensus. Caste has been evading its interrogation as the oldest race theory and racist practice, which continue to oppress the lower-caste peoples who constitute the majority population of the Indian subcontinent. Caste and race are species of the hypophysics of man, which consecrates scaled intrinsic value in human nature through the notion of \"being born as\" by \"being born to.\" They are analogues in having the same denigrate-dominate function of exploiting by including as born inferior. However, caste and race are also homologues since the hypophysics of caste has been at the origins of the hypophysics of race from at least the eighteenth century, culminating in the \"Aryan doctrine\" of the Nazis, now being revived. Caste was the empirical, conceptual, and textual resource for Europeans as it showed that large groups could be dominated as well as excluded through the self-designated superiority, supplied by the Brahminical texts, of the oppressing group. Rather than a colonial construct, caste is the oldest racism, which in colonial times devised new calypsologies—ways to mask itself against rising anticaste thought and politics. Postcolonial and subaltern theories disguise caste's racism as \"religion,\" \"culture,\" and subaltern subjectivity, while some sociologists have denigrated Dalit scholarship as unacademic and emotional. The homologies of caste are still dangerously regnant today.","PeriodicalId":43337,"journal":{"name":"Critical Philosophy of Race","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Philosophy of Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.11.1.0209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In the fight against racism, philosophy has to interrogate caste in its own histories and current decolonial consensus. Caste has been evading its interrogation as the oldest race theory and racist practice, which continue to oppress the lower-caste peoples who constitute the majority population of the Indian subcontinent. Caste and race are species of the hypophysics of man, which consecrates scaled intrinsic value in human nature through the notion of "being born as" by "being born to." They are analogues in having the same denigrate-dominate function of exploiting by including as born inferior. However, caste and race are also homologues since the hypophysics of caste has been at the origins of the hypophysics of race from at least the eighteenth century, culminating in the "Aryan doctrine" of the Nazis, now being revived. Caste was the empirical, conceptual, and textual resource for Europeans as it showed that large groups could be dominated as well as excluded through the self-designated superiority, supplied by the Brahminical texts, of the oppressing group. Rather than a colonial construct, caste is the oldest racism, which in colonial times devised new calypsologies—ways to mask itself against rising anticaste thought and politics. Postcolonial and subaltern theories disguise caste's racism as "religion," "culture," and subaltern subjectivity, while some sociologists have denigrated Dalit scholarship as unacademic and emotional. The homologies of caste are still dangerously regnant today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回避种姓的种族主义与“雅利安”主义的同源力量
摘要:在反对种族主义的斗争中,哲学必须对自身历史和当前非殖民化共识中的种姓进行质疑。种姓一直在逃避作为最古老的种族理论和种族主义实践的审讯,这些理论和实践继续压迫构成印度次大陆多数人口的低种姓人民。种姓和种族是人的虚拟物理的物种,它通过“生而为”的概念来神圣化人性的内在价值。它们是相似的,具有同样的诋毁支配功能,通过将其包括为天生的劣等人来剥削。然而,种姓和种族也是同源的,因为至少从18世纪开始,种姓的虚拟物理一直是种族虚拟物理的起源,在纳粹的“雅利安教义”中达到顶峰,现在正在复兴。种姓是欧洲人的经验、概念和文本资源,因为它表明,通过婆罗门文本提供的压迫群体的自我指定的优越感,大群体可以被统治,也可以被排斥。种姓制度不是殖民时期的产物,而是最古老的种族主义,在殖民时期,种姓制度设计出了新的口号——用来掩饰自己不受日益兴起的反种姓思想和政治的影响。后殖民和次等理论将种姓的种族主义伪装成“宗教”、“文化”和次等的主体性,而一些社会学家则诋毁达利特的学术是非学术性的和情绪化的。种姓的同系物今天仍然危险地统治着社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Philosophy of Race
Critical Philosophy of Race ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The critical philosophy of race consists in the philosophical examination of issues raised by the concept of race, the practices and mechanisms of racialization, and the persistence of various forms of racism across the world. Critical philosophy of race is a critical enterprise in three respects: it opposes racism in all its forms; it rejects the pseudosciences of old-fashioned biological racialism; and it denies that anti-racism and anti-racialism summarily eliminate race as a meaningful category of analysis. Critical philosophy of race is a philosophical enterprise because of its engagement with traditional philosophical questions and in its readiness to engage critically some of the traditional answers.
期刊最新文献
Slavery and Race: Philosophical Debates in the Eighteenth Century “Without Losing Sight of the Concrete”: Critical and Metacritical Theories of Race Reparations for Reproductive Slavery and Its Afterlives The Colonial Contract and the Coloniality Of Gender: Decolonial Feminist Reflections on Charles Mills’s Racia-Sexual Contract The Combahee River Collective Statement and Black Feminist Universalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1