Sicily without Mycenae: a cross-cultural consumption analysis of connectivity in the Bronze Age Central Mediterranean

IF 1.7 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Pub Date : 2017-02-10 DOI:10.1558/JMEA.32914
A. Russell
{"title":"Sicily without Mycenae: a cross-cultural consumption analysis of connectivity in the Bronze Age Central Mediterranean","authors":"A. Russell","doi":"10.1558/JMEA.32914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Middle Bronze Age in Sicily, there is evidence for material contact with several extra-insular societies, not least with the contemporary Mycenaean culture based in the Aegean. This Mycenaean connection typically receives the most attention, and has been used as the basis to posit the broad acculturation of Sicilian society to Aegean norms, despite a rather limited amount of evidence. To complement the empirical data of genuine imports, interpretations of Aegean influence have also been applied to Sicilian material expressions. In this study, I argue that such acculturation frameworks are too limited to analyse properly the material changes that occur in Sicily, as they rely heavily on the uncertain physical presence of ‘Mycenaeans’ on the island, and do not engage with Sicilian agency or motivations. Instead, I propose a framework borrowed from current globalisation studies, whereby what has been accepted, rejected, or heavily adapted from external sources is given equal interpretive weighting. This consumption-focused perspective also considers the likelihood of disparate systems of value and meaning. The result is an interpretive framework in which prehistoric Sicilians do not fade into the background during the Middle Bronze Age and are not overshadowed by the primary place given to Aegean influence and activity.","PeriodicalId":45203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","volume":"30 1","pages":"59-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1558/JMEA.32914","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JMEA.32914","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

During the Middle Bronze Age in Sicily, there is evidence for material contact with several extra-insular societies, not least with the contemporary Mycenaean culture based in the Aegean. This Mycenaean connection typically receives the most attention, and has been used as the basis to posit the broad acculturation of Sicilian society to Aegean norms, despite a rather limited amount of evidence. To complement the empirical data of genuine imports, interpretations of Aegean influence have also been applied to Sicilian material expressions. In this study, I argue that such acculturation frameworks are too limited to analyse properly the material changes that occur in Sicily, as they rely heavily on the uncertain physical presence of ‘Mycenaeans’ on the island, and do not engage with Sicilian agency or motivations. Instead, I propose a framework borrowed from current globalisation studies, whereby what has been accepted, rejected, or heavily adapted from external sources is given equal interpretive weighting. This consumption-focused perspective also considers the likelihood of disparate systems of value and meaning. The result is an interpretive framework in which prehistoric Sicilians do not fade into the background during the Middle Bronze Age and are not overshadowed by the primary place given to Aegean influence and activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有迈锡尼的西西里:青铜时代地中海中部连通性的跨文化消费分析
在西西里岛的青铜时代中期,有证据表明与几个岛屿外的社会有物质接触,尤其是与以爱琴海为基础的当代迈锡尼文化。这种迈锡尼联系通常受到最多的关注,并被用作假设西西里社会对爱琴海规范的广泛文化适应的基础,尽管证据相当有限。为了补充真正进口的经验数据,对爱琴海影响的解释也被应用于西西里的材料表达。在本研究中,我认为这种文化适应框架过于有限,无法正确分析西西里发生的实质性变化,因为它们严重依赖于岛上“迈锡尼人”不确定的实际存在,而不涉及西西里人的代理或动机。相反,我提出了一个借鉴当前全球化研究的框架,在这个框架中,已被接受、拒绝或大量改编自外部来源的内容被赋予同等的解释权重。这种以消费为中心的观点也考虑了不同的价值和意义系统的可能性。其结果是一个解释框架,在这个框架中,史前西西里人不会消失在青铜时代中期的背景中,也不会被给予爱琴海的影响和活动的主要地位所掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: JMA currently operates as the most progressive and valid podium for archaeological discussion and debate in Europe European Journal of Archaeology Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology is the only journal currently published that deals with the entire multicultural world of Mediterranean archaeology. The journal publishes material that deals with, amongst others, the social, politicoeconomic and ideological aspects of local or regional production and development, and of social interaction and change in the Mediterranean.
期刊最新文献
Diverging Paths A Necessary Debate Myopic Misunderstandings? Vitamin D Status among the Population Visiting Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Bhutan. Supplementary Materials for 'From the Ground Up: Modelling Agricultural Landscapes in Early Iron Age East Crete Using Legacy Survey Data and GIS'
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1