Don’t Make Me Feel Guilty! Examining the Effect of a Past Moral Deed on Perceived Irritation with Guilt Appeals in Environmental Advertising

R. Lim, Ji Mi Hong
{"title":"Don’t Make Me Feel Guilty! Examining the Effect of a Past Moral Deed on Perceived Irritation with Guilt Appeals in Environmental Advertising","authors":"R. Lim, Ji Mi Hong","doi":"10.1080/10641734.2022.2122638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An online experiment was conducted to examine a past moral deed’s influence on consumers’ response to guilt appeals in environmental advertising. The findings suggested that a guilt appeal ad increased irritation when participants engaged previously in a moral deed. Further, the results indicate that the perceived irritation mediated the interaction between past moral behaviors (i.e., previously engaged versus not engaged) and green message types (i.e., a guilt appeal versus a nonguilt appeal) and attitude toward the green advertisement and the message’s credibility. The results demonstrate that participants who performed a prior moral deed chose conventional detergent over an eco-friendly detergent when they were exposed to a guilt appeal that promoted recycling. However, no moral licensing behaviors were observed among participants in the nonguilt appeal ad. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed further.","PeriodicalId":43045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","volume":"43 1","pages":"421 - 436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Issues and Research In Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2022.2122638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract An online experiment was conducted to examine a past moral deed’s influence on consumers’ response to guilt appeals in environmental advertising. The findings suggested that a guilt appeal ad increased irritation when participants engaged previously in a moral deed. Further, the results indicate that the perceived irritation mediated the interaction between past moral behaviors (i.e., previously engaged versus not engaged) and green message types (i.e., a guilt appeal versus a nonguilt appeal) and attitude toward the green advertisement and the message’s credibility. The results demonstrate that participants who performed a prior moral deed chose conventional detergent over an eco-friendly detergent when they were exposed to a guilt appeal that promoted recycling. However, no moral licensing behaviors were observed among participants in the nonguilt appeal ad. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed further.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不要让我感到内疚!考察过去的道德行为对环境广告中内疚感诉求感知刺激的影响
摘要通过网络实验研究了环境广告中过去的道德行为对消费者内疚诉求反应的影响。研究结果表明,当参与者之前做过一件道德行为时,负罪感和愤怒感会增加。此外,研究结果表明,感知刺激介导了过去道德行为(即先前参与与未参与)与绿色信息类型(即内疚呼吁与非内疚呼吁)以及对绿色广告和信息可信度的态度之间的相互作用。结果表明,当参与者看到鼓励循环利用的内疚呼吁时,他们选择了传统的洗涤剂,而不是环保的洗涤剂。然而,在无罪上诉广告的参与者中没有观察到道德许可行为。进一步讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The Lost History of the American Academy of Advertising Exploring Persuasion Knowledge, Identity-Related Media Use, and Ad Skepticism of Black Immigrant and Refugee Adolescents Exploring Anti-Asian Racism Activism on Twitter during the Early Era of COVID-19 Hate Crimes: Implications for Marketers’ Social Purpose Communication Strategy Corporate Account As a New Endorser Developing Parasocial Relationships with Customers Modeling the Effects of Streamer Characteristics and Platform Affordances in Livestreaming E-Commerce: A Mixed-Methods Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1