The Relation Among Phonological Processing, Oral and Silent Reading Fluency, and Reading Comprehension for Students with Dyslexia: A Longitudinal Investigation

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reading & Writing Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-11-11 DOI:10.1080/10573569.2021.1972880
M. F. Robinson, Elizabeth B. Meisinger
{"title":"The Relation Among Phonological Processing, Oral and Silent Reading Fluency, and Reading Comprehension for Students with Dyslexia: A Longitudinal Investigation","authors":"M. F. Robinson, Elizabeth B. Meisinger","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2021.1972880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the relations among phonological skills, reading fluency, and reading comprehension across reading modality (oral and silent) for a sample of students (N = 121) in grades 2–5 who have been diagnosed with dyslexia. Participants were administered text-level oral and silent reading fluency and comprehension assessments and selected phonological processing measures at the beginning and end of the school year. Cross-lagged path analyses were used to examine the relations among the phonological processing and reading skills across two theoretical models, one depicting reading fluency as a single construct and another representing rate and accuracy separately. Across models, results indicated that oral reading contributed to silent reading development but that this relation was not reciprocal. RAN emerged as a robust contributor to all aspects of oral and silent reading examined in this study, whereas phonological awareness contributed to fluency across modalities but did not impact end-of-year comprehension. Results generally followed a pattern of progression from lower to higher reading skills and from oral to silent reading. Further, important trends with regard to the contribution of phonological awareness to fluency subskills (rate and accuracy) were obscured when fluency was considered as a single construct, suggesting that it may be important for researchers to consider these subskills separately.","PeriodicalId":51619,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"38 1","pages":"436 - 453"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1972880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the relations among phonological skills, reading fluency, and reading comprehension across reading modality (oral and silent) for a sample of students (N = 121) in grades 2–5 who have been diagnosed with dyslexia. Participants were administered text-level oral and silent reading fluency and comprehension assessments and selected phonological processing measures at the beginning and end of the school year. Cross-lagged path analyses were used to examine the relations among the phonological processing and reading skills across two theoretical models, one depicting reading fluency as a single construct and another representing rate and accuracy separately. Across models, results indicated that oral reading contributed to silent reading development but that this relation was not reciprocal. RAN emerged as a robust contributor to all aspects of oral and silent reading examined in this study, whereas phonological awareness contributed to fluency across modalities but did not impact end-of-year comprehension. Results generally followed a pattern of progression from lower to higher reading skills and from oral to silent reading. Further, important trends with regard to the contribution of phonological awareness to fluency subskills (rate and accuracy) were obscured when fluency was considered as a single construct, suggesting that it may be important for researchers to consider these subskills separately.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读障碍学生语音加工、口语和无声阅读流畅性与阅读理解的关系:一项纵向调查
摘要本研究旨在探讨语音技能、阅读流畅性和阅读理解之间的关系,研究对象为2-5年级被诊断为阅读障碍的学生(N = 121)。在学年开始和结束时,对参与者进行了文本水平的口语和默读流利性和理解评估,并选择了语音处理措施。交叉滞后路径分析通过两个理论模型来检验语音加工和阅读技能之间的关系,一个理论模型将阅读流畅性描述为一个单一的结构,另一个理论模型分别代表速度和准确性。在各种模型中,结果表明口头阅读有助于默读的发展,但这种关系不是相互的。在本研究中,RAN对口头阅读和默读的各个方面都有很大的贡献,而语音意识对各种形式的流利性有贡献,但对年终理解没有影响。结果通常遵循阅读技能从低到高、从口头阅读到默读的发展模式。此外,当流利被视为一个单一的结构时,语音意识对流利子技能(率和准确性)的贡献的重要趋势被模糊了,这表明研究人员分开考虑这些子技能可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Argumentative Writing for Students With Disabilities in Inclusive Science Classes: A Pilot Study Online Intervention to Prevent Summer Learning Loss For Struggling First Grade Writers Can Artificial Intelligence Identify Reading Fluency and Level? Comparison of Human and Machine Performance Exploring Relations between Teachers’ Language- and Code-Based Writing Supports to Early Literacy and Vocabulary Learning in Children with Language Vulnerabilities The Technical Adequacy of Coding Procedures for Retell Measures in Elementary School Students with Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1