Configuring enterprises as spaces for learning: possibilities, risks and limits

IF 1.9 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Continuing Education Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/0158037X.2021.1927307
Bernd Käpplinger, Anika Denninger
{"title":"Configuring enterprises as spaces for learning: possibilities, risks and limits","authors":"Bernd Käpplinger, Anika Denninger","doi":"10.1080/0158037X.2021.1927307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Researching Work & Learning (RWL) International Conference Series is the world’s longest, continuously running international research conference series serving the field of workplace learning. It was initiated in 1999. By 2022 it will have visited ten countries in five continents. The conference series as a whole is organised through the work of the RWL International Advisory Committee. This committee is composed of leading international scholars in the diverse field of workplace learning; www.rwlconferences.org is the standing organisational website of this committee. The 11th RWL conference took place at Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen in Germany in July 2019. The head of the local organising committee was Bernd Käpplinger and Anika Denninger was a key person within the local organising committee. The major theme of the conference was on Configuring Enterprises as Spaces for Learning: Possibilities, Risks and Limits. Enterprises are crucial places and spaces for learning at work. They offer chances and possibilities to learn. Progressive enterprises make resources (money, time, mentors, learning circles, staff, etc.) available for their employees and configure themselves as learning organisations. Other firms can be less interested in the learning of their employees and do little to support learning. Digitalisation offers chances for blended and hybrid forms of learning in virtual spaces. A less optimistic prognosis envisages a loss of jobs or dramatic changes with risks of de-skilling. The whole development requires attention, thus the need for research. This special issue contains papers presented in an earlier form at the conference and developed further for this issue. Soila Lemmetty considers employees’ opportunities for selfdirected learning at technology organisations. Her study uses an ethnographic approach to examine situations in which self-directed learning is realised as an individual or collective phenomenon. Bill Esmond’s paper reports a qualitative study with two case studies, located in Germany and England, of the way vocational teachers’ understandings of facilitating learning across domains are constructed. Felix Lukowski, Myriam Baum and Sabine Mohr focus on evidence of the provision of employer-provided training in times of technological change. The paper investigates German firms’ employer-provided continuing training provision for employees with different skill requirements. It uses firm-level data from the BIBB Establishment Panel on Training and Competence Development and a fractional logit model. Zan Chen, Arthur Chia and Xiaofang Bi write about ways in which innovative learning has been promoted for training and adult education in Singapore. They present findings from three projects. These show that a good proportion of training providers and adult educators are adopting blended learning to respond to changes and new demands. Asmita Bhutani Vij ‘s paper is located in the education-based Non-Government Organisation (NGO) sector in India, a large sector that depends on activities of learning, training and","PeriodicalId":46790,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Continuing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0158037X.2021.1927307","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Continuing Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2021.1927307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Researching Work & Learning (RWL) International Conference Series is the world’s longest, continuously running international research conference series serving the field of workplace learning. It was initiated in 1999. By 2022 it will have visited ten countries in five continents. The conference series as a whole is organised through the work of the RWL International Advisory Committee. This committee is composed of leading international scholars in the diverse field of workplace learning; www.rwlconferences.org is the standing organisational website of this committee. The 11th RWL conference took place at Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen in Germany in July 2019. The head of the local organising committee was Bernd Käpplinger and Anika Denninger was a key person within the local organising committee. The major theme of the conference was on Configuring Enterprises as Spaces for Learning: Possibilities, Risks and Limits. Enterprises are crucial places and spaces for learning at work. They offer chances and possibilities to learn. Progressive enterprises make resources (money, time, mentors, learning circles, staff, etc.) available for their employees and configure themselves as learning organisations. Other firms can be less interested in the learning of their employees and do little to support learning. Digitalisation offers chances for blended and hybrid forms of learning in virtual spaces. A less optimistic prognosis envisages a loss of jobs or dramatic changes with risks of de-skilling. The whole development requires attention, thus the need for research. This special issue contains papers presented in an earlier form at the conference and developed further for this issue. Soila Lemmetty considers employees’ opportunities for selfdirected learning at technology organisations. Her study uses an ethnographic approach to examine situations in which self-directed learning is realised as an individual or collective phenomenon. Bill Esmond’s paper reports a qualitative study with two case studies, located in Germany and England, of the way vocational teachers’ understandings of facilitating learning across domains are constructed. Felix Lukowski, Myriam Baum and Sabine Mohr focus on evidence of the provision of employer-provided training in times of technological change. The paper investigates German firms’ employer-provided continuing training provision for employees with different skill requirements. It uses firm-level data from the BIBB Establishment Panel on Training and Competence Development and a fractional logit model. Zan Chen, Arthur Chia and Xiaofang Bi write about ways in which innovative learning has been promoted for training and adult education in Singapore. They present findings from three projects. These show that a good proportion of training providers and adult educators are adopting blended learning to respond to changes and new demands. Asmita Bhutani Vij ‘s paper is located in the education-based Non-Government Organisation (NGO) sector in India, a large sector that depends on activities of learning, training and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将企业配置为学习空间:可能性、风险和限制
研究性工作与学习(RWL)国际会议系列是世界上持续时间最长的国际研究会议系列,服务于职场学习领域。它于1999年启动。到2022年,它将访问五大洲的十个国家。整个系列会议是通过RWL国际咨询委员会的工作组织的。该委员会由不同职场学习领域的顶尖国际学者组成;www.rwlconferences.org是该委员会的常设组织网站。第11届RWL会议于2019年7月在德国吉埃恩朱斯特斯-利比希大学举行。当地组委会负责人是Bernd Käpplinger,Anika Denninger是当地组委会的关键人物。会议的主要主题是“将企业配置为学习空间:可能性、风险和限度”。企业是工作中学习的重要场所和空间。它们提供了学习的机会和可能性。进步型企业为员工提供资源(金钱、时间、导师、学习圈、员工等),并将自己配置为学习型组织。其他公司可能对员工的学习不太感兴趣,也很少支持学习。数字化为虚拟空间中的混合和混合学习形式提供了机会。一个不太乐观的预测设想了失业或具有去技能风险的急剧变化。整个发展需要关注,因此需要研究。本特刊载有以早期形式在会议上提交的文件,并为本期进一步发展。Soila Lemmetty考虑员工在技术组织中进行自主学习的机会。她的研究采用了人种学的方法来研究自主学习作为个人或集体现象实现的情况。Bill Esmond的论文报告了一项定性研究,其中包括两个案例研究,分别位于德国和英国,研究了职业教师对促进跨领域学习的理解是如何构建的。Felix Lukowski、Myriam Baum和Sabine Mohr专注于在技术变革时期提供雇主提供的培训的证据。本文调查了德国企业雇主为不同技能要求的员工提供的继续培训。它使用了来自BIBB培训和能力发展机构小组的企业级数据和分数logit模型。Zan Chen、Arthur Chia和Xiaofang Bi写了新加坡如何在培训和成人教育中促进创新学习。他们介绍了三个项目的研究结果。这些表明,相当一部分培训提供者和成人教育工作者正在采用混合学习来应对变化和新的需求。Asmita Bhutani Vij的论文位于印度以教育为基础的非政府组织(NGO)部门,这是一个依赖学习、培训和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Continuing Education
Studies in Continuing Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Studies in Continuing Education is a scholarly journal concerned with all aspects of continuing, professional and lifelong learning. It aims to be of special interest to those involved in: •continuing professional education •adults learning •staff development •training and development •human resource development
期刊最新文献
Where is the ‘WIL’ in Work-integrated Learning Research? Learning, instruction and assessment in the workplace: applying and augmenting Communities of Practice theory Riding the emotional rollercoaster? Emotions in online doctoral studies Factors that influence university graduates’ choice of postgraduate study Constituting integration in work-integrated education and learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1