Long-term outcome of stab incision glaucoma surgery versus trabeculectomy surgery in the management of primary open angle glaucoma

W. Ebeid, A. A. Abdel Latif, A. Mousa, Mohammad Akram Awwad
{"title":"Long-term outcome of stab incision glaucoma surgery versus trabeculectomy surgery in the management of primary open angle glaucoma","authors":"W. Ebeid, A. A. Abdel Latif, A. Mousa, Mohammad Akram Awwad","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_95_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To assess the long-term outcome of Stab incision glaucoma surgery (SIGS) and compare it with subscleral trabeculectomy (SST) in the management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods Twenty eyes of 20 OAG patients were randomly assigned into group 1: 10 patients underwent SIGS + Mitomycin C (MMC), and group 2: 10 patients underwent SST + MMC. The patients were followed-up over 2 years after surgery. Our outcome measures were: Postoperative intraocular pressure IOP, number of medications used, and postoperative complications. Results Twenty-four months postoperatively, the mean IOP was 13.78±2.05 mmHg in the SIGS group compared with preoperative IOP of 26.33±5.1 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test), and 14.38±4.56 mmHg in SST group compared with preoperative IOP of 30.13±7.51 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test). No significant differences in mean IOP between groups either preoperatively (P=0.15) or along follow-up (P=0.62 at last visit). The mean IOP drop from baseline was 12.56±5.00 mmHg (46.33±10.50%) in SIGS group and 15.75±8.22 mmHg (49.50±17.95%) in SST group (P=0.26). A significant decrease in the number of glaucoma medications was noted in the SIGSS group (P <0.001), in the SST group, the number decreased but was not statistically significant (P =0.120). Conclusion SIGS is comparable with SST in achieving long-term significant and maintained IOP reduction over up to 2 years, in addition to decreasing the number of antiglaucoma medications postoperatively. SIGS is recommended for surgical management of primary OAG as it has the advantage of being a faster, easier, less traumatic alternative to conventional SST with fewer complications.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_95_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To assess the long-term outcome of Stab incision glaucoma surgery (SIGS) and compare it with subscleral trabeculectomy (SST) in the management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods Twenty eyes of 20 OAG patients were randomly assigned into group 1: 10 patients underwent SIGS + Mitomycin C (MMC), and group 2: 10 patients underwent SST + MMC. The patients were followed-up over 2 years after surgery. Our outcome measures were: Postoperative intraocular pressure IOP, number of medications used, and postoperative complications. Results Twenty-four months postoperatively, the mean IOP was 13.78±2.05 mmHg in the SIGS group compared with preoperative IOP of 26.33±5.1 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test), and 14.38±4.56 mmHg in SST group compared with preoperative IOP of 30.13±7.51 mmHg (P <0.001, paired t-test). No significant differences in mean IOP between groups either preoperatively (P=0.15) or along follow-up (P=0.62 at last visit). The mean IOP drop from baseline was 12.56±5.00 mmHg (46.33±10.50%) in SIGS group and 15.75±8.22 mmHg (49.50±17.95%) in SST group (P=0.26). A significant decrease in the number of glaucoma medications was noted in the SIGSS group (P <0.001), in the SST group, the number decreased but was not statistically significant (P =0.120). Conclusion SIGS is comparable with SST in achieving long-term significant and maintained IOP reduction over up to 2 years, in addition to decreasing the number of antiglaucoma medications postoperatively. SIGS is recommended for surgical management of primary OAG as it has the advantage of being a faster, easier, less traumatic alternative to conventional SST with fewer complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性开角型青光眼手术与小梁切除术治疗的远期疗效
目的评估Stab切口青光眼手术(SIGS)的长期疗效,并将其与巩膜下小梁切除术(SST)治疗开角型青光眼(OAG)的疗效进行比较。方法将20例OAG患者20眼随机分为1组:10例患者行SIGS + 丝裂霉素C(MMC)和第2:10组患者接受SST + MMC。术后随访2年以上。我们的结果指标是:术后眼压、用药次数和术后并发症。结果术后24个月,SIGS组的平均眼压为13.78±2.05毫米汞柱,而术前眼压为26.33±5.1毫米汞柱(P<0.001,配对t检验);SST组为14.38±4.56毫米汞柱。术前(P=0.15)或随访期间(上次访视时P=0.62),两组的平均眼压无显著差异。SIGS组平均眼压较基线下降12.56±5.00 mmHg(46.33±10.50%),SST组平均眼压下降15.75±8.22 mmHg(49.50±17.95%)(P=0.026),结论SIGS与SST相比,除了能减少术后抗青光眼药物的数量外,还能在长达2年的时间内实现长期显著且持续的眼压降低。SIGS被推荐用于原发性OAG的外科治疗,因为它具有比传统SST更快、更容易、创伤更小、并发症更少的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early versus late initiation of infliximab for refractory uveitis in a cohort of Egyptian BD patients Evaluation of macular vessel density among patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal participants “A study of knowledge, attitude and practice patterns regarding eye donation, eye banking and corneal transplantation in tertiary care hospital” Impact of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to peribulbar anesthesia on the retinal vasculature in glaucoma patients: an optical coherence tomography angiography study Changes in peripapillary and macular vasculature measured by optical coherence tomography angiography and their clinical correlation in patients with optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1