Book Review: Care and Capitalism by Kathleen Lynch

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1177/02610183231157761
L. Dodson
{"title":"Book Review: Care and Capitalism by Kathleen Lynch","authors":"L. Dodson","doi":"10.1177/02610183231157761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Black authors and the Global South into the epistemological centre of scholarship that describes and resists coloniality. In section four, the authors address how different identities may be deployed to support or challenge the workings of whiteness in various international contexts, including the U.S., Caribbean, UK, and South Africa. In the fifth section, the authors analyze the practice of whiteness in everyday life, and its operation within institutional structures and the state. Finally, the last section opens up the space to discuss challenges, tensions and debates among scholars on their understanding of whiteness. This book provides a good start at circumventing the common pitfalls of whiteness studies (such as favoring scholarship from the Global North, and essentializing Black, White, Indigenous, other racialized people back into the orbit of whiteness) and interrupting the binary ways in which the idea of whiteness is taken up in the popular imagination. Indeed, much of the decolonizing literature remains trapped in the black-white/oppressor-oppressed binary and locked within Eurocentric ways of thinking. Hence, the core strength of this collection is to bring a global perspective through voices and locations other than Western Europe, the UK and US, and to deliberately link scholarship on whiteness back to the broader debate on how race, power, politics and oppression operate. It does this by putting, at front and centre, not only past colonizing processes, but present forms of neocolonialism, and political and social justice struggles around the globe, including the emergence (or re-emergence) of popularist politics and other forms of polarization. The extent to which the authors in this volume achieve this varies, which is not surprising because whiteness and white supremacy are monoliths of such longstanding that even scholars and activists who resist it struggle, in the words of Cross and Fine who wrote the book’s Epilogue, that it is ‘hard to see where the fugitive pathways to radical transformation might be carved’ (p. 353). Notwithstanding these difficulties, this text is an invaluable help on that journey.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"364 - 366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183231157761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black authors and the Global South into the epistemological centre of scholarship that describes and resists coloniality. In section four, the authors address how different identities may be deployed to support or challenge the workings of whiteness in various international contexts, including the U.S., Caribbean, UK, and South Africa. In the fifth section, the authors analyze the practice of whiteness in everyday life, and its operation within institutional structures and the state. Finally, the last section opens up the space to discuss challenges, tensions and debates among scholars on their understanding of whiteness. This book provides a good start at circumventing the common pitfalls of whiteness studies (such as favoring scholarship from the Global North, and essentializing Black, White, Indigenous, other racialized people back into the orbit of whiteness) and interrupting the binary ways in which the idea of whiteness is taken up in the popular imagination. Indeed, much of the decolonizing literature remains trapped in the black-white/oppressor-oppressed binary and locked within Eurocentric ways of thinking. Hence, the core strength of this collection is to bring a global perspective through voices and locations other than Western Europe, the UK and US, and to deliberately link scholarship on whiteness back to the broader debate on how race, power, politics and oppression operate. It does this by putting, at front and centre, not only past colonizing processes, but present forms of neocolonialism, and political and social justice struggles around the globe, including the emergence (or re-emergence) of popularist politics and other forms of polarization. The extent to which the authors in this volume achieve this varies, which is not surprising because whiteness and white supremacy are monoliths of such longstanding that even scholars and activists who resist it struggle, in the words of Cross and Fine who wrote the book’s Epilogue, that it is ‘hard to see where the fugitive pathways to radical transformation might be carved’ (p. 353). Notwithstanding these difficulties, this text is an invaluable help on that journey.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:《关怀与资本主义》,凯瑟琳·林奇著
黑人作家和全球南方成为描述和抵制殖民主义的学术认识论中心。在第四节中,作者阐述了在包括美国、加勒比海、英国和南非在内的各种国际背景下,如何利用不同的身份来支持或挑战白人的运作。在第五部分中,作者分析了白人在日常生活中的实践,以及它在制度结构和国家中的运作。最后,最后一节为讨论学者们对白人理解的挑战、紧张关系和争论开辟了空间。这本书为规避白人研究的常见陷阱提供了一个良好的开端(例如支持来自全球北方的学术,将黑人、白人、土著人和其他种族化的人重新纳入白人的轨道),并打断了白人思想在大众想象中的二元化方式。事实上,许多非殖民化文学仍然被困在黑人-白人/压迫者-被压迫的二元世界中,并被锁定在以欧洲为中心的思维方式中。因此,该系列的核心优势是通过西欧、英国和美国以外的声音和地点带来全球视角,并有意将关于白人的学术与关于种族、权力、政治和压迫如何运作的更广泛辩论联系起来。它不仅将过去的殖民进程,而且将当前形式的新殖民主义,以及全球各地的政治和社会正义斗争,包括民粹主义政治和其他形式的两极分化的出现(或重新出现),放在首位和中心。这本书的作者实现这一点的程度各不相同,这并不奇怪,因为白人和白人至上主义是长期存在的庞然大物,用撰写该书后记的Cross和Fine的话来说,即使是抵制它的学者和活动家也很挣扎,“很难看到通往激进变革的逃亡之路可能在哪里开辟”(第353页)。尽管存在这些困难,但本案文对这一进程提供了宝贵的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Critical Social Policy provides a forum for advocacy, analysis and debate on social policy issues. We publish critical perspectives which: ·acknowledge and reflect upon differences in political, economic, social and cultural power and upon the diversity of cultures and movements shaping social policy; ·re-think conventional approaches to securing rights, meeting needs and challenging inequalities and injustices; ·include perspectives, analyses and concerns of people and groups whose voices are unheard or underrepresented in policy-making; ·reflect lived experiences of users of existing benefits and services;
期刊最新文献
Distanciation as a technology of control in the UK hostile environment. Pregnant racialised migrants and the ubiquitous border: The hostile environment as a technology of stratified reproduction. Bordering social reproduction: The welfare/immigration regimes of Quebec and Ontario in Canada Diminishing returns of growth? Economic performance, needs satisfaction and ecological impacts of OECD welfare states A cure-all for energy poverty? Thinking critically about energy advice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1