Does Productive Mean Active? The Behavior of Occasional and Serial Academic Inventors in Patenting Processes

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Triple Helix Pub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI:10.1163/21971927-bja10021
Danielle Lewensohn, Ebba Sjögren, C. Sundberg
{"title":"Does Productive Mean Active? The Behavior of Occasional and Serial Academic Inventors in Patenting Processes","authors":"Danielle Lewensohn, Ebba Sjögren, C. Sundberg","doi":"10.1163/21971927-bja10021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPrevious literature has attributed differences in individuals’ inventive productivity to a range of environmental, organizational and individual traits. However, the behavior of individuals with different inventive productivity has not been empirically explored in detail. Based on interviews with twenty Swedish academic inventors of diverse patenting experience, this paper analyses how serial and occasional inventors acted in patent initiation, patent application and subsequent patent management for specific inventions. Two modes of behavior are identified: passive and active. Individuals’ inventive productivity was not aligned with behavioral mode, with both modes of behavior exhibited by occasional as well as serial academic inventors. Individual academic inventors also varied in mode of behavior across different patent processes. These findings suggest that commonly used volume-based classifications of academic inventors obscure potentially relevant behavioral differences. This insight has implications for contemporary policy and organizational practice. It also highlights the need for further investigation of when academic inventors assume an active or passive mode of behavior in processes of academic commercialization.","PeriodicalId":31161,"journal":{"name":"Triple Helix","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Triple Helix","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous literature has attributed differences in individuals’ inventive productivity to a range of environmental, organizational and individual traits. However, the behavior of individuals with different inventive productivity has not been empirically explored in detail. Based on interviews with twenty Swedish academic inventors of diverse patenting experience, this paper analyses how serial and occasional inventors acted in patent initiation, patent application and subsequent patent management for specific inventions. Two modes of behavior are identified: passive and active. Individuals’ inventive productivity was not aligned with behavioral mode, with both modes of behavior exhibited by occasional as well as serial academic inventors. Individual academic inventors also varied in mode of behavior across different patent processes. These findings suggest that commonly used volume-based classifications of academic inventors obscure potentially relevant behavioral differences. This insight has implications for contemporary policy and organizational practice. It also highlights the need for further investigation of when academic inventors assume an active or passive mode of behavior in processes of academic commercialization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高效就意味着积极吗?偶然与连续学术发明人在专利过程中的行为
先前的文献将个人创造力的差异归因于一系列环境、组织和个人特征。然而,具有不同创造性生产力的个体的行为尚未得到详细的实证研究。本文通过对20位具有不同专利经验的瑞典学术发明人的访谈,分析了连续发明人和临时发明人在特定发明的专利发起、专利申请和后续专利管理中的行为。确定了两种行为模式:被动和主动。个体的创造性生产力与行为模式不一致,偶尔和连续的学术发明家都表现出这两种行为模式。个体学术发明人在不同的专利过程中的行为模式也各不相同。这些发现表明,学术发明人常用的基于体积的分类掩盖了潜在的相关行为差异。这一见解对当代政策和组织实践具有启示意义。它还强调了进一步调查学术发明人在学术商业化过程中何时采取主动或被动行为模式的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Triple Helix
Triple Helix Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
46.20%
发文量
14
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Key Factors for a Successful Technology Transfer Process of Digital Innovation Assets University-Industry Relationships beyond Technology Transfer: the Role of Intangible Knowledge Demand-oriented Science and Technology Parks: a New Tool for Innovation Policy From the Triple Helix Model of Innovations to the Quantitative Theory of Meaning Measuring Innovation and Collaboration System using Big Data: A Case Study about Ho Chi Minh City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1