Mosquitoes as pesticide pollution Indicators: A comparative susceptibility analysis of field and laboratory strains of mosquitoes against different conventional insecticides

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI:10.7324/jabb.2021.96014
A. Velayudhan, L. Venugopalan, Sudhikumar Ambalaparambil Vasu, Aneesh Embalil Mathachan
{"title":"Mosquitoes as pesticide pollution Indicators: A comparative susceptibility analysis of field and laboratory strains of mosquitoes against different conventional insecticides","authors":"A. Velayudhan, L. Venugopalan, Sudhikumar Ambalaparambil Vasu, Aneesh Embalil Mathachan","doi":"10.7324/jabb.2021.96014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thrissur Kole wetlands fall under the category of temporary wetlands that are exceedingly ideal procreation environments for mosquitoes. A broad array of insecticides is used as a competitive weapon in mosquito restriction tactics, including organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids. Indiscriminate use of these chemicals could develop resistance in targeted and nontargeted species present in that environment. The present study is an assessment of the susceptibility status of laboratory and field strain Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes against deltamethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, and malathion employing the World Health Organization protocol. The results show that laboratory strain mosquitoes are more susceptible than the field-collected mosquitoes toward these insecticides. The field strain of Ae. albopictus showed 6.36, 11.74, and 18.36 times resistance than the laboratory strain against malathion, deltamethrin, and lambda-cyhalothrin, respectively. Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae also repeated this resistance pattern like 4.54 times resistance against malathion and 13.15 times and 12.62 times resistance against deltamethrin and lambdacyhalothrin, correspondingly. The increased susceptibility of the field strain could also lead to a prospect of treating mosquitoes as an indicator species of pesticide contamination. Finding out the precise dosage of insecticide applications could furthermore help in the vector management program and diminish environmental pollution caused by these chemicals.","PeriodicalId":15032,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7324/jabb.2021.96014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thrissur Kole wetlands fall under the category of temporary wetlands that are exceedingly ideal procreation environments for mosquitoes. A broad array of insecticides is used as a competitive weapon in mosquito restriction tactics, including organochlorines, organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids. Indiscriminate use of these chemicals could develop resistance in targeted and nontargeted species present in that environment. The present study is an assessment of the susceptibility status of laboratory and field strain Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes against deltamethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, and malathion employing the World Health Organization protocol. The results show that laboratory strain mosquitoes are more susceptible than the field-collected mosquitoes toward these insecticides. The field strain of Ae. albopictus showed 6.36, 11.74, and 18.36 times resistance than the laboratory strain against malathion, deltamethrin, and lambda-cyhalothrin, respectively. Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae also repeated this resistance pattern like 4.54 times resistance against malathion and 13.15 times and 12.62 times resistance against deltamethrin and lambdacyhalothrin, correspondingly. The increased susceptibility of the field strain could also lead to a prospect of treating mosquitoes as an indicator species of pesticide contamination. Finding out the precise dosage of insecticide applications could furthermore help in the vector management program and diminish environmental pollution caused by these chemicals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蚊子作为杀虫剂污染指标:田间和实验室蚊虫对不同常规杀虫剂的敏感性比较分析
Thrissur Kole湿地属于临时湿地,是蚊子极其理想的繁殖环境。在限制蚊子的策略中,广泛的杀虫剂被用作竞争武器,包括有机氯、有机磷、氨基甲酸酯和拟除虫菊酯。不加选择地使用这些化学品可能会在该环境中的目标和非目标物种中产生耐药性。本研究采用世界卫生组织议定书评价了实验室和野外菌株白纹伊蚊和致倦库蚊对溴氰菊酯、高效氯氰菊酯和马拉硫磷的易感状况。结果表明,实验室蚊虫对这些杀虫剂的敏感性高于野外采集的蚊虫。Ae的场应变。白纹伊蚊对马拉硫磷、溴氰菊酯和高效氯氟氰菊酯的抗性分别是实验室品系的6.36倍、11.74倍和18.36倍。残雪。致倦库蚊幼虫对马拉硫磷的抗性为4.54倍,对溴氰菊酯和高效氯氰菊酯的抗性分别为13.15倍和12.62倍。田间菌株的易感性增加也可能导致将蚊子作为农药污染的指示物种的前景。确定杀虫剂的准确用量可以进一步帮助病媒管理,减少这些化学品对环境的污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology
Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
期刊最新文献
Characterization and comparative assessment of bactericidal activity of carbon nanodots (CDs) and nanoparticles (CNPs) prepared from soot's of clarified butter and mustard oil, respectively Screening and isolation of potential nitrogen-fixing Enterobacter sp. GG1 from mangrove soil with its accelerated impact on green chili plant (Capsicum frutescens L.) growth amelioration Synthesis of bio-nanofiber from pectin/polyvinyl alcohol for therapeutic application Letter regarding “Elastase and COVID-19 relationship, and potential natural resource as elastase inhibitors: A comprehensive review” Bacillus paralicheniformis (OQ202112) - Mediated biodiesel production using groundnut husk: A sustainable approach for bioenergy generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1