Stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal fit of premachined and castable abutments at implant abutment connection interface – An In Vitro study

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Scientific Society Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.5958/2230-7273.2022.00035.7
Prince Kumar, Swarndeep Singh, S. Mishra
{"title":"Stereomicroscopic evaluation of marginal fit of premachined and castable abutments at implant abutment connection interface – An In Vitro study","authors":"Prince Kumar, Swarndeep Singh, S. Mishra","doi":"10.5958/2230-7273.2022.00035.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The precision fit at the implant-abutment interface is a significant criterion for the success of implant restorations clinically. Various factors are involved in it, including fabrication techniques and utilized materials. The misfit at the implant-abutment interface is capable of causing screw loosening and fracture of the abutment screws. Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the marginal fit of premachined and castable abutment at implant-abutment connection interface using stereomicroscope. Materials and Methods: Fifteen castable abutments (Group A) and 15 premachined titanium abutments (Group B) were used for the study and connected to titanium implants and evaluated under the stereomicroscope. Images of the sample were recorded at three equidistant points at the implant-abutment interface to measure the vertical microgap at the platform level. The data were subjected to statistical evaluation using the “t”-test. Results: Data were sent for the statistical analysis by the software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version. The mean for Group A (customized abutments) at mesiobuccal point was 13.2199 with a standard error of 0.5281. For premachined abutments, it was 6.4629 and with a standard error of 0.3201. Similarly, the mean for Group A (customized abutments) at the distobuccal point was 12.0861 with a standard error of 0.3428. On comparative assessment, the mean microgap in between the groups showed significant difference (Tukey test). Conclusion: On implant-abutment interface at the platform level, the microgaps of premachined implant abutments were significantly lesser than the casted implant abutments. Furthermore, the microgap of both tested groups was found within the clinically acceptable ranges.","PeriodicalId":55681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Scientific Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Scientific Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7273.2022.00035.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The precision fit at the implant-abutment interface is a significant criterion for the success of implant restorations clinically. Various factors are involved in it, including fabrication techniques and utilized materials. The misfit at the implant-abutment interface is capable of causing screw loosening and fracture of the abutment screws. Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the marginal fit of premachined and castable abutment at implant-abutment connection interface using stereomicroscope. Materials and Methods: Fifteen castable abutments (Group A) and 15 premachined titanium abutments (Group B) were used for the study and connected to titanium implants and evaluated under the stereomicroscope. Images of the sample were recorded at three equidistant points at the implant-abutment interface to measure the vertical microgap at the platform level. The data were subjected to statistical evaluation using the “t”-test. Results: Data were sent for the statistical analysis by the software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version. The mean for Group A (customized abutments) at mesiobuccal point was 13.2199 with a standard error of 0.5281. For premachined abutments, it was 6.4629 and with a standard error of 0.3201. Similarly, the mean for Group A (customized abutments) at the distobuccal point was 12.0861 with a standard error of 0.3428. On comparative assessment, the mean microgap in between the groups showed significant difference (Tukey test). Conclusion: On implant-abutment interface at the platform level, the microgaps of premachined implant abutments were significantly lesser than the casted implant abutments. Furthermore, the microgap of both tested groups was found within the clinically acceptable ranges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预制和浇注基牙在种植体-基牙连接界面边缘配合的立体显微镜评估——体外研究
背景:种植体-基牙界面的精确配合是临床种植体修复成功的重要标准。它涉及各种因素,包括制造技术和使用的材料。种植体-基牙界面处的不配合会导致基牙螺钉松动和断裂。目的:应用体视显微镜评价预制基牙与铸造基牙在种植体-基牙连接界面的边缘配合度。材料与方法:采用15个铸造基牙(A组)和15个预制钛基牙(B组),与钛种植体连接,体视显微镜下观察。在种植体-基牙界面的三个等距点记录样品的图像,以测量平台水平的垂直微间隙。数据采用“t”检验进行统计评价。结果:使用statistical Package for Social Sciences version软件发送数据进行统计分析。A组(定制基牙)在中颊点的平均值为13.2199,标准误差为0.5281。预加工基台的标准误差为6.4629,标准误差为0.3201。同样,A组(定制基台)在分布点的平均值为12.0861,标准误差为0.3428。经比较,两组间平均微差差异有统计学意义(Tukey检验)。结论:在种植体-基台交界面上,预制基台的微间隙明显小于铸造基台。此外,两组的微间隙均在临床可接受的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Scientific Society
Journal of the Scientific Society MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Paradigm Shift in Prosthodontics: Analog to Digital Proportion of Urinary Tract Infection in Children between 6 Months to 5 Years of Age Presenting with Fever Renal Manifestation of Mixed Connective Tissue Disease The Study of COVID-19 Infection in Health-Care Workers Post-COVID Vaccination Physical Fitness in Children with Thalassemia Major Measured With 6-min Walk Test
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1